Literature DB >> 29031947

The long-term survival of robotic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: A multi-institutional study.

Robert J Cerfolio1, Asem F Ghanim2, Mark Dylewski3, Giulia Veronesi4, Lorenzo Spaggiari5, Bernard J Park6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to report the world's largest series with the longest follow-up of robotic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
METHODS: This was a multi-institutional retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients from 4 institutions' prospective robotic databases.
RESULTS: There were 1339 patients (men 55%, median age 68 years). The median operative time was 136 minutes, median number of lymph nodes was 13 (5 N2 stations and 1 N1), median blood loss was 50 cc, and 4 (0.005%) patients received intraoperative transfusions. Conversions occurred in 116 patients (9%) and for bleeding in 24 (2%). Median length of stay was 3 days. Major morbidity occurred in 8%. The 30-day and 90-day operative mortality was 0.2% and 0.5%, respectively. Follow-up was complete in 99% of patients with a median follow-up of 30 months (range 1-154 months). The 5-year stage-specific survival was: 83% for the 672 patients with stage IA NSCLC, 77% for the 281 patients with stage IB, 68% for the 118 patients with stage IIA, 70% for 99 patients with IIB, 62% for 143 patients with stage IIIA (122 had N2 disease, 73%), and 31% for 8 patients with stage IIIB (none had N3 disease). The cumulative incidence of metastatic NSCLC was 15% (128 patients, 95% confidence interval, 13%-18%). The cumulative incidence of local recurrence in the ipsilateral operated chest was 3% only (26 patients, 95% confidence interval, 2%-5%).
CONCLUSIONS: The oncologic results of robotic lobectomy for NSCLC are promising, especially for patients with pathologic N2 disease. However, further follow-up and studies are needed.
Copyright © 2017 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lung cancer; quality outcomes; robotic surgery; survival

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29031947      PMCID: PMC5896345          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  20 in total

Review 1.  Robotic lobectomy and segmentectomy for lung cancer: results and operating technique.

Authors:  Giulia Veronesi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Robotic anatomic lung resections: the initial experience and description of learning in 102 cases.

Authors:  Alper Toker; Mehmet Oğuzhan Özyurtkan; Erkan Kaba; Kemal Ayalp; Özkan Demirhan; Elena Uyumaz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Patterns of recurrence and incidence of second primary tumors after lobectomy by means of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) versus thoracotomy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Raja M Flores; Ugonna N Ihekweazu; Nabil Rizk; Joseph Dycoco; Manjit S Bains; Robert J Downey; Prasad Adusumilli; David J Finley; James Huang; Valerie W Rusch; Inderpal Sarkaria; Bernard Park
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Video robotic lobectomy.

Authors:  Franca M A Melfi; Marcello C Ambrogi; Marco Lucchi; Alfredo Mussi
Journal:  Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2005-01-01

5.  Nationwide Assessment of Robotic Lobectomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Ravi Rajaram; Sanjay Mohanty; David J Bentrem; Emily S Pavey; David D Odell; Ankit Bharat; Karl Y Bilimoria; Malcolm M DeCamp
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  VATS is an adequate oncological operation for stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  P Thomas; C Doddoli; S Yena; X Thirion; F Sebag; P Fuentes; R Giudicelli
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM Classification of malignant tumours.

Authors:  Peter Goldstraw; John Crowley; Kari Chansky; Dorothy J Giroux; Patti A Groome; Ramon Rami-Porta; Pieter E Postmus; Valerie Rusch; Leslie Sobin
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 15.609

8.  Pain, Quality of Life, and Clinical Outcomes after Robotic Lobectomy.

Authors:  Valerie Lacroix; Zahra Mosala Nezhad; David Kahn; Arnaud Steyaert; Alain Poncelet; Thierry Pieters; Philippe Noirhomme
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 1.827

9.  Lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) versus thoracotomy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Raja M Flores; Bernard J Park; Joseph Dycoco; Anna Aronova; Yael Hirth; Nabil P Rizk; Manjit Bains; Robert J Downey; Valerie W Rusch
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Long-term survival after lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer by video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy.

Authors:  Paul C Lee; Abu Nasar; Jeffrey L Port; Subroto Paul; Brendon Stiles; Ya-Lin Chiu; Weston G Andrews; Nasser K Altorki
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  31 in total

1.  Refocusing the quality lens to examine real-life value.

Authors:  Aaron Kime; Anthony W Kim
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Robotic lobectomy leads to excellent survival in lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Min P Kim
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  RATS: a word is enough to the wise.

Authors:  Daniel Valdivia; Khaled Mardanzai; Clemens Aigner
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  How to get the best from robotic thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Sara Ricciardi; Carmelina Cristina Zirafa; Federico Davini; Franca Melfi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Early-Stage NSCLC: Advances in Thoracic Oncology 2018.

Authors:  Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Giulia Veronesi; Wentao Fang; Simon Ekman; Kenichi Suda; Joachim G Aerts; Jessica Donington
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 15.609

6.  Reply to the comments on 'Three-arm robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for locally advanced N2 non-small cell lung cancer', a better technique, new territory, and future hopes.

Authors:  Xinghua Cheng; Jia Huang; Jiantao Li; Peiji Lu; Qingquan Luo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Paradigm shift in local consolidative therapy for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christopher Cao; Adam Chakos; Allen Guo; John J Park; Tajalli Saghaie; Prunella Blinman
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

8.  Non-small cell lung cancer 2 cm or less: robotic segmentectomy sets the gold standard against non-surgical therapy.

Authors:  Dana Ferrari-Light; Robert J Cerfolio
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-07

Review 9.  New Surgical Approaches in the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Giye Choe; Rebecca Carr; Daniela Molena
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 2.878

10.  Feedback on the use of three surgical sealants for preventing prolonged air leak after robot-assisted anatomical lung resection.

Authors:  Henri Gondé; Constance Le Gac; André Gillibert; Benjamin Bottet; Marc Laurent; Matthieu Sarsam; Charles Hervouët; Rémi Varin; Jean-Marc Baste
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.