Literature DB >> 21055770

Patterns of recurrence and incidence of second primary tumors after lobectomy by means of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) versus thoracotomy for lung cancer.

Raja M Flores1, Ugonna N Ihekweazu, Nabil Rizk, Joseph Dycoco, Manjit S Bains, Robert J Downey, Prasad Adusumilli, David J Finley, James Huang, Valerie W Rusch, Inderpal Sarkaria, Bernard Park.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Reports have questioned the oncologic efficacy of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery when compared with thoracotomy despite similar survival results. In response, we investigated the pattern of recurrent disease and the incidence of second primary tumors after lobectomy by means of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and thoracotomy.
METHODS: All patients who underwent lobectomy for clinical stage IA lung cancer determined by means of computed tomographic and positron emission tomographic analysis were identified from a prospective database at a single institution. All patients were selected for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or thoracotomy by an individual surgeon. Patients' characteristics, perioperative results, recurrences, and second primary tumors were recorded. Variables were compared by using Student's t test, the Pearson χ(2) test, and Fisher's exact test. A logistic regression model was constructed to identify variables influencing the development of recurrent disease or metachronous tumors.
RESULTS: From 2002 to 2009, 520 patients underwent lobectomy by means of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, and 652 underwent lobectomy by means of thoracotomy. Final pathological stage was similar in the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and thoracotomy groups. Logistic regression demonstrated a lower risk (odds ratio, 0.65; P = .01) of recurrent disease in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery after adjusting for age, stage, sex, histology, tumor location, and synchronous primary tumors.
CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence rates for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery appear to be at least equivalent to those for thoracotomy. This study supports lobectomy by means of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery as an oncologically sound technique.
Copyright © 2011 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21055770     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.08.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  17 in total

Review 1.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer.

Authors:  Sanghoon Jheon; Hee Chul Yang; Sukki Cho
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-03-28

2.  Severe intraoperative complications during VATS Lobectomy compared with thoracotomy lobectomy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Chaoyang Liang; Huanshun Wen; Yongqing Guo; Bin Shi; Yanchu Tian; Zhiyi Song; Deruo Liu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  A meta-analysis of unmatched and matched patients comparing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and conventional open lobectomy.

Authors:  Christopher Cao; Con Manganas; Su C Ang; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-05

4.  Locoregional recurrence after VATS surgery for NSCLC.

Authors:  Pierre-Emmanuel Falcoz; Gilbert Massard
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Analysis of first recurrence and survival in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer treated with surgical resection or stereotactic radiation therapy.

Authors:  Traves D Crabtree; Varun Puri; Clifford Robinson; Jeffrey Bradley; Stephen Broderick; G Alexander Patterson; Jingxia Liu; Joanne F Musick; Jennifer M Bell; Michael Yang; Bryan F Meyers
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Minimally invasive lobectomy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer-it can be done without sacrificing oncologic outcomes.

Authors:  Mark F Berry
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer: republication of a systematic review and a proposal by the guidelines committee of the Japanese Association for Chest Surgery 2014.

Authors:  Shin-Ichi Yamashita; Taichiro Goto; Takeshi Mori; Hirotoshi Horio; Yoshihisa Kadota; Takeshi Nagayasu; Akinori Iwasaki
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-09-03

8.  Patient Preferences in Treatment Choices for Early-Stage Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Betty C Tong; Scott Wallace; Matthew G Hartwig; Thomas A D'Amico; Joel C Huber
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Patterns of survival and recurrence after surgical treatment of early stage non-small cell lung carcinoma in the ACOSOG Z0030 (ALLIANCE) trial.

Authors:  Stacey Su; Walter J Scott; Mark S Allen; Gail E Darling; Paul A Decker; Robert J McKenna; Bryan F Meyers
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: an unavoidable trend? A retrospective single-institution series of 410 cases.

Authors:  Charles-Henri Marty-Ané; Ludovic Canaud; Laurence Solovei; Pierre Alric; Jean-Philippe Berthet
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-04-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.