Alper Toker1, Mehmet Oğuzhan Özyurtkan2, Erkan Kaba1, Kemal Ayalp1, Özkan Demirhan1, Elena Uyumaz1. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Istanbul Bilim University and Group Florence Nightingale Hospital, Abide-i Hürriyet Cad. No: 166, Şişli, Istanbul, Turkey. 2. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Istanbul Bilim University and Group Florence Nightingale Hospital, Abide-i Hürriyet Cad. No: 166, Şişli, Istanbul, Turkey. moozyurtkan@hotmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze our initial pulmonary resection experience with robotic surgery (Da Vinci, Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Mountain View, California, USA) and define the learning curve based on the duration of operations. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on patients undergoing robotic pulmonary resections from October 2011 to December 2014. The operating time, including the docking and console times, postoperative hospitalization, and peri- and postoperative complications were studied. RESULTS: Hundred patients underwent 102 robotic anatomic pulmonary resections due to various pathologies. Fifty-three percent of the patients underwent lobectomy procedure, whereas 45% underwent segmentectomy. The mean operating time was 104 ± 34 min. The learning curve was calculated to be 14 patients (R(2) = 0.57). The complication rate in our series was 24% (n = 24) and higher in elderly patients (p = 0.03) and in patients with longer operating times (p = 0.03). Prolonged air leaks were observed in 10, and arrhythmia developed in nine patients. Two patients died, due to a concurrent lymphoblastic leukemia diagnosed at the postoperative period and exacerbation of interstitial fibrosis, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic pulmonary resections prove to be safe and effective even at the initial learning experience. The duration of operations is considered to be acceptable. The learning curve could be established after 14 cases.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze our initial pulmonary resection experience with robotic surgery (Da Vinci, Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Mountain View, California, USA) and define the learning curve based on the duration of operations. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on patients undergoing robotic pulmonary resections from October 2011 to December 2014. The operating time, including the docking and console times, postoperative hospitalization, and peri- and postoperative complications were studied. RESULTS: Hundred patients underwent 102 robotic anatomic pulmonary resections due to various pathologies. Fifty-three percent of the patients underwent lobectomy procedure, whereas 45% underwent segmentectomy. The mean operating time was 104 ± 34 min. The learning curve was calculated to be 14 patients (R(2) = 0.57). The complication rate in our series was 24% (n = 24) and higher in elderly patients (p = 0.03) and in patients with longer operating times (p = 0.03). Prolonged air leaks were observed in 10, and arrhythmia developed in nine patients. Two patients died, due to a concurrent lymphoblastic leukemia diagnosed at the postoperative period and exacerbation of interstitial fibrosis, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic pulmonary resections prove to be safe and effective even at the initial learning experience. The duration of operations is considered to be acceptable. The learning curve could be established after 14 cases.
Authors: Franca M A Melfi; Gian Franco Menconi; A Massimo Mariani; Carlo Alberto Angeletti Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Alexandra D Power; Desmond M D'Souza; Susan D Moffatt-Bruce; Robert E Merritt; Peter J Kneuertz Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2019-08-02 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Robert J Cerfolio; Asem F Ghanim; Mark Dylewski; Giulia Veronesi; Lorenzo Spaggiari; Bernard J Park Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2017-09-18 Impact factor: 5.209