Literature DB >> 29744221

How to get the best from robotic thoracic surgery.

Sara Ricciardi1, Carmelina Cristina Zirafa2, Federico Davini2, Franca Melfi2.   

Abstract

The application of Robotic technology in thoracic surgery has become widespread in the last decades. Thanks to its advanced features, the robotic system allows to perform a broad range of complex operations safely and in a comfortable way, with valuable advantages related to low invasiveness. Regarding lung tumours, several studies have shown the benefits of robotic surgery including lower blood loss and improved lymph node removal when compared with other minimally invasive techniques. Moreover, the robotic instruments allow to reach deep and narrow spaces permitting safe and precise removal of tumours located in remote areas, such as retrosternal and posterior mediastinal spaces with outstanding postoperative and oncological results. One controversial finding about the application of robotic system is its high capital and running costs. For this reason, a limited number of centres worldwide are able to employ this groundbreaking technology and there are limited possibilities for the trainees to acquire the necessary skills in robotic surgery. Therefore, a training programme based on three steps of learning, associated with a solid surgical background and a consistent operating activity, are required to obtain effective results. Putting this highest technological innovation in the hand of expert surgeons we can assure safe and effective procedures getting the best from robotic thoracic surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Robotic thoracic surgery; lung; mediastinum; minimally invasive; non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Year:  2018        PMID: 29744221      PMCID: PMC5934117          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.03.157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  24 in total

1.  Early experience with robotic technology for thoracoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Franca M A Melfi; Gian Franco Menconi; A Massimo Mariani; Carlo Alberto Angeletti
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 2.  A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome.

Authors:  M M Chowdhury; H Dagash; A Pierro
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Multi-institutional European experience of robotic thymectomy for thymoma.

Authors:  Giuseppe Marulli; Jos Maessen; Franca Melfi; Thomas A Schmid; Marlies Keijzers; Olivia Fanucchi; Florian Augustin; Giovanni M Comacchio; Alfredo Mussi; Monique Hochstenbag; Federico Rea
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-01

4.  Robot-assisted surgery for posterior mediastinal mass.

Authors:  Carmelina Cristina Zirafa; Franca Melfi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  The influence of hospital volume on survival after resection for lung cancer.

Authors:  P B Bach; L D Cramer; D Schrag; R J Downey; S E Gelfand; C B Begg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-07-19       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Robotic-assisted thymectomy: surgical procedure and results.

Authors:  Jens Rueckert; Marc Swierzy; Harun Badakhshi; Andreas Meisel; Mahmoud Ismail
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 1.827

7.  Determinants of Complete Resection of Thymoma by Minimally Invasive and Open Thymectomy: Analysis of an International Registry.

Authors:  Bryan M Burt; Xiaopan Yao; Joseph Shrager; Alberto Antonicelli; Sukhmani Padda; Jonathan Reiss; Heather Wakelee; Stacey Su; James Huang; Walter Scott
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 15.609

8.  Impact of teaching facility status and high-volume centers on outcomes for lung cancer resection: an examination of 13,469 surgical patients.

Authors:  Michael C Cheung; Kara Hamilton; Recinda Sherman; Margaret M Byrne; Dao M Nguyen; Dido Franceschi; Leonidas G Koniaris
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 9.  Minimally Invasive versus Open Thymectomy for Thymic Malignancies: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Adam J Friedant; Elizabeth A Handorf; Stacey Su; Walter J Scott
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 15.609

10.  Report on First International Workshop on Robotic Surgery in Thoracic Oncology.

Authors:  Giulia Veronesi; Robert Cerfolio; Roberto Cingolani; Jens C Rueckert; Luc Soler; Alper Toker; Umberto Cariboni; Edoardo Bottoni; Uberto Fumagalli; Franca Melfi; Carlo Milli; Pierluigi Novellis; Emanuele Voulaz; Marco Alloisio
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 6.244

View more
  5 in total

1.  Objective analysis of postoperative air leaks can aid in decision-making, but does the use of digital drains really impact patient outcomes?

Authors:  Vijay Joshi; Ioannis Dimarakis
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Quality assessment of robot assisted thoracic surgical resection of non-small cell lung cancer: nodal upstaging and mediastinal recurrence.

Authors:  Ghada M Shahin; Besir Topal; Sjaak Pouwels; Thanasie L Markou; Rody Boon; Jos A Stigt
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Robotic transthoracic diaphragmatic hernia repair.

Authors:  Antonios C Sideris; Daniela Molena
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-08-21

4.  A balancing act-the role of opioid-sparing anesthesia in enhancing recovery after thoracic surgery.

Authors:  John Kit Chung Tam
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 3.005

5.  Thoracic redo-robotic surgery (TRRS): a case series of a single centre.

Authors:  Sara Ricciardi; Federico Davini; Gaetano Romano; Carmelina Cristina Zirafa; Franca Melfi
Journal:  Mediastinum       Date:  2020-12-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.