| Literature DB >> 29023425 |
Bilal Zulfiqar1, Amy J Jones2, Melissa L Sykes3, Todd B Shelper4, Rohan A Davis5, Vicky M Avery6.
Abstract
Kinetoplastid parasites cause vector-borne parasitic diseases including leishmaniasis, human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) and Chagas disease. These Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) impact on some of the world's lowest socioeconomic communities. Current treatments for these diseases cause severe toxicity and have limited efficacy, highlighting the need to identify new treatments. In this study, the Davis open access natural product-based library was screened against kinetoplastids (Leishmania donovani DD8, Trypanosoma brucei brucei and Trypanosoma cruzi) using phenotypic assays. The aim of this study was to identify hit compounds, with a focus on improved efficacy, selectivity and potential to target several kinetoplastid parasites. The IC50 values of the natural products were obtained for L. donovani DD8, T. b. brucei and T. cruzi in addition to cytotoxicity against the mammalian cell lines, HEK-293, 3T3 and THP-1 cell lines were determined to ascertain parasite selectivity. Thirty-one compounds were identified with IC50 values of ≤ 10 µM against the kinetoplastid parasites tested. Lissoclinotoxin E (1) was the only compound identified with activity across all three investigated parasites, exhibiting IC50 values < 5 µM. In this study, natural products with the potential to be new chemical starting points for drug discovery efforts for kinetoplastid diseases were identified.Entities:
Keywords: Chagas disease; drug discovery; human African trypanosomiasis; kinetoplastids; leishmaniasis; natural products; neglected tropical disease
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29023425 PMCID: PMC6151456 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22101715
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Structures of compounds 1–15.
Dose response and mechanism of action of reference compounds against L. donovani DD8, T. b. brucei and T. cruzi.
| Compound | Mechanism of Action | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IC50 (mean ± SD) (μM) | IC50 (mean ± SD) (μM) | IC50 (mean ± SD) (μM) | IC50 (mean ± SD) (μM) | ||
| Amphotericin B | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 0.20 ± 0.02 | - | - | Binds to ergosterol, the principal sterol in fungal cell membranes and |
| Miltefosine | 3.48 ± 0.26 | 2.54 ± 0.57 | - | - | Interacts with lipids (phospholipids and sterols), including membrane lipids, inhibition of cytochrome C oxidase (mitochondrial function), and apoptosis [ |
| Pentamidine | - | - | 0.002 ± 0.001 | - | Accumulates in trypanosomes; disrupts mitochondrial processes [ |
| Diminazene | - | - | 0.04 ± 0.01 | - | Interferes with RNA editing and trans-splicing [ |
| Puromycin | - | - | 0.03 ± 0.00 | 1.65 ± 0.35 | Protein synthesis inhibitor via premature chain termination during translation in the ribosome [ |
| Benznidazole | - | - | - | 3.36 ± 1.52 | Causes oxidation in the nucleotide pool which in turn causes the formation of breaks in double stranded DNA [ |
| Nifurtimox | - | - | - | 0.62 ± 0.10 | Unknown. Possibly appears to be due to oxidative stress—potentially from the formation of hydrogen peroxide [ |
All results from two independent experiments (n = 2). a Selectivity index (SI) compared to HEK-293 cells. b Selectivity index (SI) compared to THP-1 cells.
In vitro anti-kinetoplastid activities of compounds.
| Compounds | Anti-Leishmanial Activity | Anti-Trypanosomal Activity | Comments | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IC50 (mean ± SD) (μM) | IC50 (mean ± SD) (μM) | IC50 (mean ± SD) (μM) | IC50 (mean ± SD) (μM) | ||
| Lissoclinotoxin E ( | 0.72 ± 0.16 | 4.41 ± 0.24 | 0.57 ± 0.20 | 3.92 ± 0.38 | Active on all three parasites with IC50 < 5 uM. Exhibits high selectivity for |
| Spermatinamine ( | 11.87 ± 0.56 | 6.15 ± 0.05 | 1.00 ± 0.26 | - | Active on |
| Thiaplakortone A ( | - | - | 3.94 ± 0.78 | 4.26 ± 0.65 | Active on |
| Gambogic acid ( | 100% inhibition at | - | 0.27 ± 0.04 | 1.87 ± 0.07 | Active on |
| Mycophenolic acid ( | - | - | 0.51 ± 0.10 | 1.59 ± 0.03 | Active on |
| Narciclasine ( | 100% inhibition at | - | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | Active on |
| Thiaplakortone analogue ( | - | - | 0.68 ± 0.01 | 3.55 ± 0.38 | Active on |
| Mefloquine HCl ( | 100% inhibition at | - | 0.62 ± 0.06 | 3.96 ± 0.58 | Moderate selectivity for |
| 3,4-Dihydro-2 | 100% inhibition at | - | - | 3.81 ± 0.60 | Active on |
| Emetine dihydrochloride ( | 100% inhibition at | - | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.09 ± 0.00 | Active on |
| Lissoclinotoxin F ( | 5.51 ± 0.30 | 8.31 ± 0.67 | - | - | Active on both forms of |
| Ethyl 4-((diethyl-amino)methyl)-5-hydroxy-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-methyl-1 | 100% inhibition at | 11.09 ± 0.31 | - | - | Low selectivity for |
| Chalcone analogue ( | 100% inhibition at | 5.65 ± 0.26 | - | - | Active on |
| Psammaplysin F ( | - | - | - | 5.63 ± 0.76 | Moderate Selectivity for |
| Chelerythrine chloride ( | - | - | 0.23 ± 0.04 | - | Only selective on |
All results from two independent experiments (n = 2). a Selectivity index (SI) compared to HEK-293 cells. b Selectivity index (SI) compared to THP-1 cells. c Selectivity index (SI) compared to 3T3 cells.
Figure 2(A) Spider plot displaying the IC50 values of compounds for L. donovani DD8 promastigotes, L. donovani DD8 intracellular amastigotes, T. b. brucei and T. cruzi; (B) Venn diagram for overlapping active hits identified against L. donovani DD8 promastigotes, L. donovani DD8 intracellular amastigotes, T. b. brucei and T. cruzi.
Figure 3Scatter plot of active hits against L. donovani DD8 promastigotes and L. donovani DD8 intracellular amastigotes. Right top quadrant exhibiting compounds found to be active on both L. donovani DD8 promastigotes and L. donovani DD8 intracellular amastigotes.