Literature DB >> 29021917

A feasibility pilot using telehealth videoconference monitoring of home-based NMES resistance training in persons with spinal cord injury.

Ashraf S Gorgey1,2, Robert M Lester1, Rodney C Wade1, Refka E Khalil1, Rehan K Khan3, Melodie L Anderson1, Teodoro Castillo1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The objective of the study was to investigate the feasibility and initial efficacy of telehealth communication in conjunction with surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) resistance training (RT) to induce muscle hypertrophy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a home-based setting of within-subject control design of trained vs controlled limbs. Five men with chronic (>1 year postinjury) motor-complete spinal cord injury (SCI) participated in a twice-weekly telehealth videoconference program using home-based NMES-RT for 8 weeks. Stimulation was applied to the knee extensor muscle group of the trained leg, while the untrained leg served as a control. Participants received real-time feedback to ensure a proper setup of electrodes and stimulator to monitor subject safety throughout the entire training session. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure cross-sectional areas (CSAs) and intramuscular fat (IMF) of the whole thigh and individual muscle groups. Average two-way travel time, distance traveled in miles and total cost of gas per mile were calculated.
RESULTS: Participants had 100% compliance. Trained whole and absolute knee extensor muscle CSA increased by 13% (P=0.002) and 18% (P=0.0002), with no changes in the controlled limb. Absolute knee flexor and adductor CSAs increased by 3% (P=0.02) and 13% (P=0.0001), respectively. Absolute whole thigh and knee extensor IMF CSAs decreased significantly in the trained limb by 14% (P=0.01) and 36% (P=0.0005), respectively, with no changes in controlled limb. DISCUSSION: The pilot work documented that using telehealth communication is a safe, feasible and potentially cost-reducing approach for monitoring home-based NMES-RT in persons with chronic SCI. All trained muscles showed detectable muscle hypertrophy with concomitant decrease in ectopic adipose tissue.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medical research

Year:  2017        PMID: 29021917      PMCID: PMC5633749          DOI: 10.1038/scsandc.2017.39

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases        ISSN: 2058-6124


  30 in total

1.  Electrically stimulated resistance training in SCI individuals increases muscle fatigue resistance but not femoral artery size or blood flow.

Authors:  M J Sabatier; L Stoner; E T Mahoney; C Black; C Elder; G A Dudley; K McCully
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Differences in current amplitude evoking leg extension in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Ashraf S Gorgey; Gilbert M Cho; David R Dolbow; David R Gater
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.138

3.  Effects of resistance training on adiposity and metabolism after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Ashraf S Gorgey; Kieren J Mather; Heather R Cupp; David R Gater
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 4.  Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation-Induced Resistance Training After SCI: A Review of the Dudley Protocol.

Authors:  C Scott Bickel; Ceren Yarar-Fisher; Edward T Mahoney; Kevin K McCully
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2015-11-16

5.  A report of anticipated benefits of functional electrical stimulation after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Ashraf S Gorgey; Christopher R Harnish; Jonathan A Daniels; David R Dolbow; Allison Keeley; Jewel Moore; David R Gater
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Differences in quadriceps femoris muscle torque when using a clinical electrical stimulator versus a portable electrical stimulator.

Authors:  Christian L Lyons; Joel B Robb; James J Irrgang; G Kelley Fitzgerald
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2005-01

7.  Long-term exercise training in persons with spinal cord injury: effects on strength, arm ergometry performance and psychological well-being.

Authors:  A L Hicks; K A Martin; D S Ditor; A E Latimer; C Craven; J Bugaresti; N McCartney
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.772

8.  Electrically induced resistance training in individuals with motor complete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Terence E Ryan; Jared T Brizendine; Deborah Backus; Kevin K McCully
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  A pilot study of a telehealth intervention for persons with spinal cord dysfunction.

Authors:  B V Houlihan; A Jette; R H Friedman; M Paasche-Orlow; P Ni; J Wierbicky; K Williams; S Ducharme; J Zazula; P Cuevas; D Rosenblum; S Williams
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 2.772

10.  Functional and clinical outcomes of telemedicine in patients with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Laura Dallolio; Mauro Menarini; Sandra China; Manfredi Ventura; Andy Stainthorpe; Anba Soopramanien; Paola Rucci; Maria Pia Fantini
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  6 in total

1.  Paradigms of Lower Extremity Electrical Stimulation Training After Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Ashraf S Gorgey; Refka E Khalil; Robert M Lester; Gary A Dudley; David R Gater
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Quantification of trunk and android lean mass using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry compared to magnetic resonance imaging after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Kathleen C Rankin; Laura C O'Brien; Ashraf S Gorgey
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Arm crank ergometry improves cardiovascular disease risk factors and community mobility independent of body composition in high motor complete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  James J Bresnahan; Gary J Farkas; Jody L Clasey; James W Yates; David R Gater
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  Skeletal muscle hypertrophy and attenuation of cardio-metabolic risk factors (SHARC) using functional electrical stimulation-lower extremity cycling in persons with spinal cord injury: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ashraf S Gorgey; Refka E Khalil; John C Davis; William Carter; Ranjodh Gill; Jeannie Rivers; Rehan Khan; Lance L Goetz; Teodoro Castillo; Timothy Lavis; Adam P Sima; Edward J Lesnefsky; Christopher C Cardozo; Robert A Adler
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Testosterone and long pulse width stimulation (TLPS) for denervated muscles after spinal cord injury: a study protocol of randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Ashraf S Gorgey; Refka E Khalil; Malak Alrubaye; Ranjodh Gill; Jeannie Rivers; Lance L Goetz; David X Cifu; Teodoro Castillo; Deborah Caruso; Timothy D Lavis; Edward J Lesnefsky; Christopher C Cardozo; Robert A Adler
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 3.006

6.  Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate-Intensity Training on Cardiometabolic Health Markers in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Kyle Graham; Ceren Yarar-Fisher; Jia Li; Kevin M McCully; James H Rimmer; Danille Powell; C Scott Bickel; Gordon Fisher
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2019-05-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.