Literature DB >> 29443103

Paradigms of Lower Extremity Electrical Stimulation Training After Spinal Cord Injury.

Ashraf S Gorgey1, Refka E Khalil2, Robert M Lester2, Gary A Dudley3, David R Gater4.   

Abstract

Skeletal muscle atrophy, increased adiposity and reduced physical activity are key changes observed after spinal cord injury (SCI) and are associated with numerous cardiometabolic health consequences. These changes are likely to increase the risk of developing chronic secondary conditions and impact the quality of life in persons with SCI. Surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation evoked resistance training (NMES-RT) was developed as a strategy to attenuate the process of skeletal muscle atrophy, decrease ectopic adiposity, improve insulin sensitivity and enhance mitochondrial capacity. However, NMES-RT is limited to only a single muscle group. Involving multiple muscle groups of the lower extremities may maximize the health benefits of training. Functional electrical stimulation-lower extremity cycling (FES-LEC) allows for the activation of 6 muscle groups, which is likely to evoke greater metabolic and cardiovascular adaptation. Appropriate knowledge of the stimulation parameters is key to maximizing the outcomes of electrical stimulation training in persons with SCI. Adopting strategies for long-term use of NMES-RT and FES-LEC during rehabilitation may maintain the integrity of the musculoskeletal system, a pre-requisite for clinical trials aiming to restore walking after injury. The current manuscript presents a combined protocol using NMES-RT prior to FES-LEC. We hypothesize that muscles conditioned for 12 weeks prior to cycling will be capable of generating greater power, cycle against higher resistance and result in greater adaptation in persons with SCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29443103      PMCID: PMC5912427          DOI: 10.3791/57000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  47 in total

1.  Influence of complete spinal cord injury on skeletal muscle cross-sectional area within the first 6 months of injury.

Authors:  M J Castro; D F Apple; E A Hillegass; G A Dudley
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1999-09

2.  Electrically stimulated resistance training in SCI individuals increases muscle fatigue resistance but not femoral artery size or blood flow.

Authors:  M J Sabatier; L Stoner; E T Mahoney; C Black; C Elder; G A Dudley; K McCully
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 3.  Functional electrical stimulation therapies after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  David R Gater; David Dolbow; Britney Tsui; Ashraf S Gorgey
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.138

4.  Body composition of sedentary and physically active spinal cord injured individuals estimated from total body electrical conductivity.

Authors:  M M Olle; J M Pivarnik; W J Klish; J R Morrow
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Effects of resistance training on adiposity and metabolism after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Ashraf S Gorgey; Kieren J Mather; Heather R Cupp; David R Gater
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Body composition changes after 12 months of FES cycling: case report of a 60-year-old female with paraplegia.

Authors:  D R Dolbow; A S Gorgey; D R Gater; J R Moore
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.772

7.  Effects of a fifty-six month electrical stimulation cycling program after tetraplegia: case report.

Authors:  David R Dolbow; Ashraf S Gorgey; Refka K Khalil; David R Gater
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 1.985

8.  Electrically induced resistance training in individuals with motor complete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Terence E Ryan; Jared T Brizendine; Deborah Backus; Kevin K McCully
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Effects of electrical stimulation parameters on fatigue in skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Ashraf S Gorgey; Christopher D Black; Christopher P Elder; Gary A Dudley
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.751

10.  Skeletal muscle conditioning may be an effective rehabilitation intervention preceding functional electrical stimulation cycling.

Authors:  Rodney C Wade; Ashraf S Gorgey
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.135

View more
  3 in total

1.  Prediction of thigh skeletal muscle mass using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry compared to magnetic resonance imaging after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Robert M Lester; Mina P Ghatas; Rehan M Khan; Ashraf S Gorgey
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Skeletal muscle hypertrophy and attenuation of cardio-metabolic risk factors (SHARC) using functional electrical stimulation-lower extremity cycling in persons with spinal cord injury: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ashraf S Gorgey; Refka E Khalil; John C Davis; William Carter; Ranjodh Gill; Jeannie Rivers; Rehan Khan; Lance L Goetz; Teodoro Castillo; Timothy Lavis; Adam P Sima; Edward J Lesnefsky; Christopher C Cardozo; Robert A Adler
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 3.  The role of electrical stimulation for rehabilitation and regeneration after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Brian A Karamian; Nicholas Siegel; Blake Nourie; Mijail D Serruya; Robert F Heary; James S Harrop; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2022-01-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.