| Literature DB >> 31443727 |
Ashraf S Gorgey1,2, Refka E Khalil3, John C Davis3, William Carter4, Ranjodh Gill5,6, Jeannie Rivers6, Rehan Khan7, Lance L Goetz3,4, Teodoro Castillo3,4, Timothy Lavis3,4, Adam P Sima8, Edward J Lesnefsky9,10, Christopher C Cardozo11,12, Robert A Adler5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) are at heightened risks of developing unfavorable cardiometabolic consequences due to physical inactivity. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) and surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES)-resistance training (RT) have emerged as effective rehabilitation methods that can exercise muscles below the level of injury and attenuate cardio-metabolic risk factors. Our aims are to determine the impact of 12 weeks of NMES + 12 weeks of FES-lower extremity cycling (LEC) compared to 12 weeks of passive movement + 12 weeks of FES-LEC on: (1) oxygen uptake (VO2), insulin sensitivity, and glucose disposal in adults with SCI; (2) skeletal muscle size, intramuscular fat (IMF), and visceral adipose tissue (VAT); and (3) protein expression of energy metabolism, protein molecules involved in insulin signaling, muscle hypertrophy, and oxygen uptake and electron transport chain (ETC) activities. METHODS/Entities:
Keywords: Functional electrical stimulation; Neuromuscular electrical stimulation; Resistance training; Spinal cord injury
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31443727 PMCID: PMC6708188 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3560-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trials ISSN: 1745-6215 Impact factor: 2.279
Fig. 1Rationale of the study. Briefly summarizes the negative impacts of SCI on body composition and cardiometabolic prolife and how adding NMES-RT to FES-LEC training may help to alleviate these health-related consequences and serve as a rehabilitation approach for persons with SCI
Randomization of individuals with motor complete SCI using block randomization based on level of injury (paraplegia vs tetraplegia) and time since injury (less than or more than 10 years) into either NMES + FES or PM + FES
| Subject ID | Assignment | Baseline 1 | Post-intervention 1 | Post-intervention 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001–10123 | PM + FES | C | C | C |
| 002–10187 | PM + FES | C | C | C |
| 003–10122 | NMES + FES | C | C | C |
| 004–10006 | NMES + FES | C | C | C |
| 005–10128 | NMES + FES | C | C | C |
| 006–10142 | PM + FES | C | C | X |
| 007–10179 | NMES + FES | C | C | C |
| 008 | N/A | X | X | X |
| 009–10135 | NMES + FES | C | Withdraw | X |
| 010–10177 | PM + FES | C | C | C |
| 011–10064 | PM + FES | C | C | C |
| 012–10181 | NMES+FES | C | C | C |
| 013–10026 | PM + FES | Withdraw | X | X |
| 014–10149 | NMES + FES | C | C | C |
| 015–10089 | NMES + FES | C | C | C |
| 016–10140 | PM + FES | C | C | C |
| 017–10178 | PM + FES | C | C | C |
| 018–10154 | PM + FES | C | C | C |
| 019–10034 | NMES + FES | C | C | C |
| 020–10176 | NMES + FES | C | C | C |
| 021–10163 | NMES + FES | Withdraw | X | X |
| 022–10130 | PM + FES | C | C | C |
| 023–10113 | PM + FES | C | C | Withdraw |
| 024–10186 | NMES + FES | C | C | C |
| 025 | N/A | x | x | X |
| 026–10097 | PM + FES | withdraw | x | X |
| 027–10148 | PM + FES | C | C | C |
| 028–10092 | NMES + FES | C | C | Withdraw |
| 029–10180 | NMES + FES | C | C | C |
| 030–10019 | PM + FES | C | C | C |
| 031 | N/A | x | x | X |
| 032–10160 | NMES + FES | C | C | X |
| 033–10052 | PM + FES | C | C | X |
| 034 | N/A | x | x | X |
| 035 | Pending randomization | |||
| 036 | TBR | |||
| 037 | TBR | |||
| 038 | TBR | |||
| 039 | TBR | |||
| 040 | TBR | |||
| 041 | TBR | |||
| 042 | TBR | |||
| 043 | TBR | |||
| 044 | TBR | |||
| 045 | TBR | |||
| 046 | TBR | |||
| 047 | TBR | |||
| 048 | TBR |
C completed, NA not assigned for #008, 025, and 031, TBR to be recruited later
Before baseline 1, randomization was performed into NMES + FES or PM + FES groups. Post-intervention 1 (n = 23) was conducted after 12 weeks of intervention of either NMES or PM. Post-intervention 2 (n = 20) was conducted after 12 weeks of FES
Fig. 2The study timeline and procedure are highlighted. After screening and consent, participants will be randomized into one of two testing groups. Each participant will undergo baseline testing (B) before beginning NMES + FES or Control + FES. Each group will then be tested for metabolic, body, and muscle composition (P1) after a 12-week period. Each group will then complete 12 weeks of FES followed by another bout of testing (P2)
The breakdown of the number of persons who have been contacted for the study, who have completed the study, or are currently actively participating in the study. All others have either failed screening or withdrawn from the study
| Study period | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Enrolment | Enrolment | Baseline | Post-intervention | |||
| Timepoint** | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | ||
| Pre-enrolment: |
| |||||
| Not-interested |
| |||||
| Expressed interest |
| |||||
| Phone screen Failure |
| |||||
| Physical screen failure |
| |||||
| Qualified and Enrolled |
| |||||
| Enrolment [1 = a +b] |
| |||||
| No Show (a) | 29 | |||||
| Consented (b) [2=c +d + e + F] |
| |||||
| Screen Failure (c) | 5 | |||||
| Withdrawn (d) | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | ||
| | 21 | |||||
| | 3 | |||||
| Pending future enrollment (g) | 13 | |||||
| Total sample size [3=b +g] |
| |||||
| Interventions: | ||||||
| [NMES+FES] | 15 | 14 | 13 | 12 | ||
| [Control + FES] | 15 | 13 | 13 | 12 | ||
| Assessments: | ||||||
| [Body Composition Variables] | X | X | X | |||
| [Metabolic variables] | X | X | X | |||
| [Muscle Biopsy variables] | X | X | X | |||
| [Torque and fatigue variables] | X | X | X | |||
Progression of resistance in 0.5-Nm increments per 10-min stage
| Visit 1 | Visit 2 | Comment | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage 1 (10 min) | Stage 2 (10 min) | Stage 3 (10 min) | Stage 1 (10 min) | Stage 2 (10 min) | Stage 3 (10 min) | ||
| Week 1 | 1 Nm | 1.5 Nm | 2.0 | 1 Nm | 1.5 | 2.0 | If completing the 2 visits without the motor turned on, paradigm will change in week 2 |
| Week 2 | 1.5 Nm | 2.0 | 2.5 | 1.5 Nm | 2.0 | 2.5 | If the motor tuned on, the same paradigm will be maintained in week 3 |
| Week 3 | 1.5 Nm | 2.0 | 2.5 | 1.5 Nm | 2.0 | 2.5 | If completing the 2 visits without the motor turned on, paradigm will change in week 4 |
| Week 4 | 2 Nm | 2.5 | 3.0 | 2 Nm | 2.5 | 3.0 | And so on till week 12 |