| Literature DB >> 36198461 |
Ashraf S Gorgey1, Refka E Khalil2, Malak Alrubaye2, Ranjodh Gill3, Jeannie Rivers2, Lance L Goetz2, David X Cifu4, Teodoro Castillo2, Deborah Caruso2, Timothy D Lavis2, Edward J Lesnefsky5, Christopher C Cardozo6, Robert A Adler3.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Long pulse width stimulation (LPWS; 120-150 ms) has the potential to stimulate denervated muscles and to restore muscle size in denervated people with spinal cord injury (SCI). We will determine if testosterone treatment (TT)+LPWS would increase skeletal muscle size, leg lean mass and improve overall metabolic health in persons with SCI with denervation. We hypothesise that the 1-year TT+LPWS will upregulate protein synthesis pathways, downregulate protein degradation pathways and increase overall mitochondrial health. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Twenty-four male participants (aged 18-70 years with chronic SCI) with denervation of both knee extensor muscles and tolerance to the LPWS paradigm will be randomised into either TT+neuromuscular electrical stimulation via telehealth or TT+LPWS. The training sessions will be twice weekly for 1 year. Measurements will be conducted 1 week prior training (baseline; week 0), 6 months following training (postintervention 1) and 1 week after the end of 1 year of training (postintervention 2). Measurements will include body composition assessment using anthropometry, dual X-ray absorptiometry and MRI to measure size of different muscle groups. Metabolic profile will include measuring of basal metabolic rate, followed by blood drawn to measure fasting biomarkers similar to hemoglobin A1c, lipid panels, C reactive protein, interleukin-6 and free fatty acids and then intravenous glucose tolerance test to test for insulin sensitivity and glucose effectiveness. Finally, muscle biopsy will be captured to measure protein expression and intracellular signalling; and mitochondrial electron transport chain function. The participants will fill out 3 days dietary record to monitor their energy intake on a weekly basis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by Institutional Review Board of the McGuire Research Institute (ID # 02189). Dissemination plans will include the Veteran Health Administration and its practitioners, the national SCI/D services office, the general healthcare community and the veteran population, as well as the entire SCI community via submitting quarterly letters or peer-review articles. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03345576. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.Entities:
Keywords: neurobiology; neuromuscular disease; neurophysiology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36198461 PMCID: PMC9535184 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064748
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 3.006
Figure 1The study timeline (table 4) and procedure are highlighted. After screening and consent, participants will be randomised into one of two testing groups. Each participant will undergo baseline testing before beginning TT+LPWS or control TT+NMES. Each group will be tested for metabolic, body and muscle composition (P1) after a 6-month period. Each group will then complete another 6 months of electrical stimulation exercise training followed by another testing (P2). BMR, basal metabolic rate; DXA, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; IVGTT, intravenous glucose tolerance test; LPWS, long pulse width stimulation; NMES, neuromuscular electrical stimulation; TT, testosterone treatment.
Timeline of research activities across the 4-year study duration
| Research activities | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | ||||
| Months | 1–6 | 6–12 | 1–6 | 6–12 | 1–6 | 6–12 | 1–6 | 6–12 |
| Equipment and supply purchase |
| |||||||
| Recruitment (n=4 per quarter) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Screen and enrol subjects |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Data collection |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Progress report |
|
|
|
| ||||
| Data entry/coding/cleaning |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Data analysis and interpretation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Presentation/Publications |
|
|
| |||||
Progression of the current amplitude (mA) of the stimulation parameters, and ankle weights of the right leg from week 1 to week 45 following LPWS protocol in the trial
| Repetitions | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ||
| Week 1 | ||||||||||||
| Pulse width: 200 ms | Set 1 | Amp (mA)-set 1 | 160 | 160 | 160 | 160 | 160 | 165 | 165 | 165 | 165 | 165 |
| Pulse interval: 400 ms | Set 2 | Amp (mA)-set 2 | 170 | 170 | 170 | 170 | 170 | 175 | 175 | 175 | 175 | 175 |
| Frequency: 1.66 Hz | Set 3 | Amp (mA)-set 3 | 180 | 180 | 180 | 180 | 180 | 185 | 185 | 185 | 185 | 185 |
| Ankle weights: 0 lbs | Set 4 | Amp (mA)-set 4 | 190 | 190 | 190 | 190 | 190 | 195 | 195 | 195 | 195 | 195 |
| Week 45 | ||||||||||||
| Pulse width: 35 ms | Set 1 | Amp (mA)-set 1 | 200 | 172 | 148 | 163 | 165 | 166 | 169 | 182 | 200 | 173 |
| Pulse interval: 400 ms | Set 2 | Amp (mA)-set 2 | 191 | 183 | 173 | 180 | 179 | 200 | 170 | 185 | 187 | 187 |
| Frequency: 25 Hz | Set 3 | Amp (mA)-set 3 | 200 | 177 | 163 | 194 | 200 | 199 | 200 | 200 | 170 | 191 |
| Ankle weights: 2 lbs | Set 4 | Amp (mA)-set 4 | 200 | 173 | 177 | 173 | 196 | 200 | 195 | 178 | 200 | 200 |
The highlighted region represents the amplitude in week 45.
Note the amplitude of the current increased approximately by 19% in week 1 from set 1 to set 4, this reflects the increase in muscle fatigue of the denervated knee extensor muscle group during one training session. This fatigue pattern decreased to only 9% in week 45 (ie, last training bout) following 12 months of training in one of the participants.
LPWS, long pulse width stimulation.
The use of random number generators to plan randomisation of 24 participants with SCI with LMN injury into either TT+LPWS (n=12) or TT+NMES (n=12; control group) for the entire study
| Subject ID | Randomisation | Assignment | Order in the group |
| 1 | 1 | TT+LPWS | 1 |
| 2 | 1 | TT+LPWS | 2 |
| 3 | 0 | TT+NMES | 1C |
| 4 | 0 | TT+LPWS | 2C |
| 5 | 0 | TT+NMES | 3C |
| 6 | 0 | TT+NMES | 4C |
| 7 | 1 | TT+LPWS | 3 |
| 8 | 1 | TT+NMES | 4 |
| 9 | 1 | TT+LPWS | 5 |
| 10 | 0 | TT+NMES | 5C |
| 11 | 0 | TT+NMES | 6C |
| 12 | 1 | TT+LPWS | 6 |
| 13 | 1 | TT+LPWS | 7 |
| 14 | 0 | TT+NMES | 7C |
| 15 | 0 | TT+NMES | 8C |
| 16 | 1 | TT+LPWS | 8 |
| 17 | 0 | TT+NMES | 9C |
| 18 | 1 | TT+LPWS | 9 |
| 19 | 0 | TT+NMES | 10C |
| 20 | 1 | TT+LPWS | 10 |
| 21 | 1 | TT+LPWS | 11 |
| 22 | 0 | TT+NMES | 11C |
| 23 | 0 | TT+NMES | 12C |
| 24 | 1 | TT+LPWS | 12 |
In the randomisation column, 1 refers to TT+LPWS and 0 refers to TT+NMES. C refers to control group.
LMN, lower motor neurons; LPWS, long pulse width stimulation; NMES, neuromuscular electrical stimulation; SCI, spinal cord injury; TT, testosterone treatment.
The number of persons who were recruited, completed or withdrew from the study
| Subject ID | TT+LPWS/NMES | Baseline 1 | Postintervention | Postintervention 2 | Sex | LOI | TSI (years) | AIS | Classification |
| 001 | TT+LPWS | C | C | C | M | T9 | 2 | A | Paraplegia |
| 002 | TT+LPWS | C | C | X | M | T7 | 5 | C | Paraplegia |
| 003 | TT+NMES | C | C | C | M | T11 | 2 | A | Paraplegia |
| 004 | TT+LPWS | C | C | X | M | T11 | 19 | A | Paraplegia |
| 005 | Withdrew | X | X | X | M | T11 | 12 | A | Paraplegia |
| 006 | TT+NMES | C | C | C | M | T11 | 20 | A | Paraplegia |
| 007 | Withdrew | X | X | X | M | T10 | 2.5 | B | Paraplegia |
| 008 | TT+NMES | C | C | C | M | T10 | 12 | A | Paraplegia |
| 009 | TT+LPWS | C | C | C | M | T12 | 14 | A | Paraplegia |
| 010 | TT+LPWS | C | C | O | M | T12 | 6 | A | Paraplegia |
| 011 | TT+NMES | C | C | O | M | T6 | 8 | A | Paraplegia |
| 012 | TT+NMES | C | O | O | M | T11 | 28 | A | Paraplegia |
AIS, American Spinal Injury Impairment Scale; C, completed the study; LOI, level of injury; LPWS, long pulse width stimulation; M, male; NMES, neuromuscular electrical stimulation; O, still ongoing; TSI, Time since injury; TT, testosterone treatment; X, withdrew from the study.
Example of progression of the stimulation parameters over 1-year period for TT+LPWS group
| Months of training | Pulse width (ms) | Interpulse interval (ms) | Frequency (Hz) | Amplitude of current (mA) | Weight (lbs) |
| 1–3 | 120–150 | 400 | 2 | Up to 200 | 0 |
| 4–6 | 90–120 | 400 | 15–25 | Up to 200 | 0 |
| 6–9 | 60–90 | 100–400 | 25–30 | Up to 200 | 2 lbs/40 reps/session |
| 9–12 | 30–60 | 10–12 | 25–30 | Up to 200 | 2 lbs/40 reps/session |
LPWS, long pulse width stimulation; reps, repetitions; TT, testosterone treatment.