Literature DB >> 29021206

RADX interacts with single-stranded DNA to promote replication fork stability.

Lisa Schubert1, Teresa Ho1,2, Saskia Hoffmann1, Peter Haahr1, Claire Guérillon1, Niels Mailand3,2.   

Abstract

Single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) regions form as an intermediate in many DNA-associated transactions. Multiple cellular proteins interact with ssDNA via the oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding (OB) fold domain. The heterotrimeric, multi-OB fold domain-containing Replication Protein A (RPA) complex has an essential genome maintenance role, protecting ssDNA regions from nucleolytic degradation and providing a recruitment platform for proteins involved in responses to replication stress and DNA damage. Here, we identify the uncharacterized protein RADX (CXorf57) as an ssDNA-binding factor in human cells. RADX binds ssDNA via an N-terminal OB fold cluster, which mediates its recruitment to sites of replication stress. Deregulation of RADX expression and ssDNA binding leads to enhanced replication fork stalling and degradation, and we provide evidence that a balanced interplay between RADX and RPA ssDNA-binding activities is critical for avoiding these defects. Our findings establish RADX as an important component of cellular pathways that promote DNA replication integrity under basal and stressful conditions by means of multiple ssDNA-binding proteins.
© 2017 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA replication; genome integrity; replication protein A; replication stress; single‐stranded DNA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29021206      PMCID: PMC5666600          DOI: 10.15252/embr.201744877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO Rep        ISSN: 1469-221X            Impact factor:   8.807


  37 in total

Review 1.  Mitotic homologous recombination maintains genomic stability and suppresses tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Moynahan; Maria Jasin
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  Functional uncoupling of MCM helicase and DNA polymerase activities activates the ATR-dependent checkpoint.

Authors:  Tony S Byun; Marcin Pacek; Muh-ching Yee; Johannes C Walter; Karlene A Cimprich
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 3.  Replication Catastrophe: When a Checkpoint Fails because of Exhaustion.

Authors:  Luis Toledo; Kai John Neelsen; Jiri Lukas
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 4.  ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK: The Trinity at the Heart of the DNA Damage Response.

Authors:  Andrew N Blackford; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  The PSO4 protein complex associates with replication protein A (RPA) and modulates the activation of ataxia telangiectasia-mutated and Rad3-related (ATR).

Authors:  Li Wan; Jun Huang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes.

Authors:  Lee Zou; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-06-06       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding fold proteins: a growing family of genome guardians.

Authors:  Rachel Litman Flynn; Lee Zou
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 8.250

8.  ETAA1 acts at stalled replication forks to maintain genome integrity.

Authors:  Thomas E Bass; Jessica W Luzwick; Gina Kavanaugh; Clinton Carroll; Huzefa Dungrawala; Gloria G Glick; Michael D Feldkamp; Reid Putney; Walter J Chazin; David Cortez
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 28.824

9.  Activation of the ATR kinase by the RPA-binding protein ETAA1.

Authors:  Peter Haahr; Saskia Hoffmann; Maxim A X Tollenaere; Teresa Ho; Luis Ignacio Toledo; Matthias Mann; Simon Bekker-Jensen; Markus Räschle; Niels Mailand
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 28.824

10.  Common Viral Integration Sites Identified in Avian Leukosis Virus-Induced B-Cell Lymphomas.

Authors:  James F Justice; Robin W Morgan; Karen L Beemon
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 7.867

View more
  13 in total

1.  RADX controls RAD51 filament dynamics to regulate replication fork stability.

Authors:  Madison B Adolph; Taha M Mohamed; Swati Balakrishnan; Chaoyou Xue; Florian Morati; Mauro Modesti; Eric C Greene; Walter J Chazin; David Cortez
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  RADX Modulates RAD51 Activity to Control Replication Fork Protection.

Authors:  Kamakoti P Bhat; Archana Krishnamoorthy; Huzefa Dungrawala; Edwige B Garcin; Mauro Modesti; David Cortez
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 9.423

3.  RADX interacts with single-stranded DNA to promote replication fork stability.

Authors:  Lisa Schubert; Teresa Ho; Saskia Hoffmann; Peter Haahr; Claire Guérillon; Niels Mailand
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  RADX prevents genome instability by confining replication fork reversal to stalled forks.

Authors:  Archana Krishnamoorthy; Jessica Jackson; Taha Mohamed; Madison Adolph; Alessandro Vindigni; David Cortez
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 19.328

Review 5.  Advances in understanding DNA processing and protection at stalled replication forks.

Authors:  Kimberly Rickman; Agata Smogorzewska
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 10.539

6.  Rad52 prevents excessive replication fork reversal and protects from nascent strand degradation.

Authors:  Eva Malacaria; Giusj Monia Pugliese; Masayoshi Honda; Veronica Marabitti; Francesca Antonella Aiello; Maria Spies; Annapaola Franchitto; Pietro Pichierri
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 7.  Homologous recombination defects and how they affect replication fork maintenance.

Authors:  Mi Young Son; Paul Hasty
Journal:  AIMS Genet       Date:  2019-04-03

8.  Identification and validation of a novel signature for prediction the prognosis and immunotherapy benefit in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Yichi Zhang; Yifeng Lin; Daojun Lv; Xiangkun Wu; Wenjie Li; Xueqing Wang; Dongmei Jiang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 9.  Replication Fork Reversal and Protection.

Authors:  Shan Qiu; Guixing Jiang; Liping Cao; Jun Huang
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-05-10

Review 10.  A fork in the road: Where homologous recombination and stalled replication fork protection part ways.

Authors:  Stephanie Tye; George E Ronson; Joanna R Morris
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 7.727

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.