Literature DB >> 34107305

RADX prevents genome instability by confining replication fork reversal to stalled forks.

Archana Krishnamoorthy1, Jessica Jackson2, Taha Mohamed1, Madison Adolph1, Alessandro Vindigni2, David Cortez3.   

Abstract

RAD51 facilitates replication fork reversal and protects reversed forks from nuclease degradation. Although potentially a useful replication stress response mechanism, unregulated fork reversal can cause genome instability. Here we show that RADX, a single-strand DNA binding protein that binds to and destabilizes RAD51 nucleofilaments, can either inhibit or promote fork reversal depending on replication stress levels. RADX inhibits fork reversal at elongating forks, thereby preventing fork slowing and collapse. Paradoxically, in the presence of persistent replication stress, RADX localizes to stalled forks to generate reversed fork structures. Consequently, inactivating RADX prevents fork-reversal-dependent telomere dysfunction in the absence of RTEL1 and blocks nascent strand degradation when fork protection factors are inactivated. Addition of RADX increases SMARCAL1-dependent fork reversal in conditions in which pre-binding RAD51 to a model fork substrate is inhibitory. Thus, RADX directly interacts with RAD51 and single-strand DNA to confine fork reversal to persistently stalled forks.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA2; DNA damage; DNA repair; DNA replication; electron microscopy; genome instability; telomere

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34107305      PMCID: PMC8286330          DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell        ISSN: 1097-2765            Impact factor:   19.328


  38 in total

1.  The intra-S phase checkpoint targets Dna2 to prevent stalled replication forks from reversing.

Authors:  Jiazhi Hu; Lei Sun; Fenfen Shen; Yufei Chen; Yu Hua; Yang Liu; Mian Zhang; Yiren Hu; Qingsong Wang; Wei Xu; Fei Sun; Jianguo Ji; Johanne M Murray; Antony M Carr; Daochun Kong
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  DNA processing is not required for ATM-mediated telomere damage response after TRF2 deletion.

Authors:  Giulia B Celli; Titia de Lange
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2005-06-19       Impact factor: 28.824

3.  Visualization and interpretation of eukaryotic DNA replication intermediates in vivo by electron microscopy.

Authors:  Kai J Neelsen; Arnab Ray Chaudhuri; Cindy Follonier; Raquel Herrador; Massimo Lopes
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2014

Review 4.  The plasticity of DNA replication forks in response to clinically relevant genotoxic stress.

Authors:  Matteo Berti; David Cortez; Massimo Lopes
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 94.444

5.  Substrate-selective repair and restart of replication forks by DNA translocases.

Authors:  Rémy Bétous; Frank B Couch; Aaron C Mason; Brandt F Eichman; Maria Manosas; David Cortez
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 9.423

6.  A Dominant Mutation in Human RAD51 Reveals Its Function in DNA Interstrand Crosslink Repair Independent of Homologous Recombination.

Authors:  Anderson T Wang; Taeho Kim; John E Wagner; Brooke A Conti; Francis P Lach; Athena L Huang; Henrik Molina; Erica M Sanborn; Heather Zierhut; Belinda K Cornes; Avinash Abhyankar; Carrie Sougnez; Stacey B Gabriel; Arleen D Auerbach; Stephen C Kowalczykowski; Agata Smogorzewska
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  RADX interacts with single-stranded DNA to promote replication fork stability.

Authors:  Lisa Schubert; Teresa Ho; Saskia Hoffmann; Peter Haahr; Claire Guérillon; Niels Mailand
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 8.807

8.  Stabilization of Reversed Replication Forks by Telomerase Drives Telomere Catastrophe.

Authors:  Pol Margalef; Panagiotis Kotsantis; Valerie Borel; Roberto Bellelli; Stephanie Panier; Simon J Boulton
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Replication fork reversal triggers fork degradation in BRCA2-defective cells.

Authors:  Sofija Mijic; Ralph Zellweger; Nagaraja Chappidi; Matteo Berti; Kurt Jacobs; Karun Mutreja; Sebastian Ursich; Arnab Ray Chaudhuri; Andre Nussenzweig; Pavel Janscak; Massimo Lopes
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Two replication fork remodeling pathways generate nuclease substrates for distinct fork protection factors.

Authors:  W Liu; A Krishnamoorthy; R Zhao; D Cortez
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 14.136

View more
  3 in total

1.  Single Molecular Resolution to Monitor DNA Replication Fork Dynamics upon Stress by DNA Fiber Assay.

Authors:  Wenpeng Liu
Journal:  Bio Protoc       Date:  2021-12-20

Review 2.  Non-Recombinogenic Functions of Rad51, BRCA2, and Rad52 in DNA Damage Tolerance.

Authors:  Félix Prado
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 3.  The Emerging Roles of Rad51 in Cancer and Its Potential as a Therapeutic Target.

Authors:  Ziyi Wang; Renxiang Jia; Linlin Wang; Qiwei Yang; Xiaohai Hu; Qiang Fu; Xinyu Zhang; Wenya Li; Yi Ren
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 5.738

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.