Hilla Sarig Bahat1, Kate Croft2, Courtney Carter2, Anna Hoddinott2, Elliot Sprecher3, Julia Treleaven2. 1. The Department of Physical Therapy, University of Haifa, 199 Aba Khoushy Ave., Mount Carmel, 3498838, Haifa, Israel. hbahat@research.haifa.ac.il. 2. CCRE Spine SHRS, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 3. The Department of Physical Therapy, University of Haifa, 199 Aba Khoushy Ave., Mount Carmel, 3498838, Haifa, Israel.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate short- and intermediate-term effects of kinematic training (KT) using virtual reality (VR) or laser in patients with chronic neck pain. METHODS: A randomised controlled trial with three arms (laser, VR, control) to post-intervention (N = 90), and two arms (laser or VR) continuing to 3 months follow-up. Home training intervention was provided during 4 weeks to VR and laser groups while control group waited. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures included neck disability index (NDI), global perceived effect (GPE), and cervical motion velocity (mean and peak). Secondary outcome measures included pain intensity (VAS), health status (EQ5D), kinesiophobia (TSK), range, smoothness, and accuracy of neck motion as measured by the neck VR system. Measures were taken at baseline, immediately post-training, and 3 months later. RESULTS:Ninety patients with neck pain were randomised to the trial, of which 76 completed 1 month follow-up, and 56 the 3 months follow-up. Significant improvements were demonstrated in NDI and velocity with good effect sizes in intervention groups compared to control. No within-group changes were presented in the control group, compared to global improvements in intervention groups. Velocity significantly improved at both time points in both groups. NDI, VAS, EQ5D, TSK and accuracy significantly improved at both time points in VR and in laser at 3 months evaluation in all but TSK. GPE scores showed 74-84% of participants perceived improvement and/or were satisfied. Significant advantages to the VR group compared to laser were found in velocity, pain intensity, health status and accuracy at both time points. CONCLUSION: The results support home kinematic training using VR or laser for improving disability, neck pain and kinematics in the short and intermediate term with an advantage to the VR group. The results provide directions for future research, use and development. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12615000231549.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To evaluate short- and intermediate-term effects of kinematic training (KT) using virtual reality (VR) or laser in patients with chronic neck pain. METHODS: A randomised controlled trial with three arms (laser, VR, control) to post-intervention (N = 90), and two arms (laser or VR) continuing to 3 months follow-up. Home training intervention was provided during 4 weeks to VR and laser groups while control group waited. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures included neck disability index (NDI), global perceived effect (GPE), and cervical motion velocity (mean and peak). Secondary outcome measures included pain intensity (VAS), health status (EQ5D), kinesiophobia (TSK), range, smoothness, and accuracy of neck motion as measured by the neck VR system. Measures were taken at baseline, immediately post-training, and 3 months later. RESULTS: Ninety patients with neck pain were randomised to the trial, of which 76 completed 1 month follow-up, and 56 the 3 months follow-up. Significant improvements were demonstrated in NDI and velocity with good effect sizes in intervention groups compared to control. No within-group changes were presented in the control group, compared to global improvements in intervention groups. Velocity significantly improved at both time points in both groups. NDI, VAS, EQ5D, TSK and accuracy significantly improved at both time points in VR and in laser at 3 months evaluation in all but TSK. GPE scores showed 74-84% of participants perceived improvement and/or were satisfied. Significant advantages to the VR group compared to laser were found in velocity, pain intensity, health status and accuracy at both time points. CONCLUSION: The results support home kinematic training using VR or laser for improving disability, neck pain and kinematics in the short and intermediate term with an advantage to the VR group. The results provide directions for future research, use and development. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12615000231549.
Authors: Jan J M Pool; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Jan L Hoving; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2007-12-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: H Sveistrup; M Thornton; C Bryanton; J McComas; S Marshall; H Finestone; A McCormick; J McLean; M Brien; Y Lajoie; E Bisson Journal: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Date: 2004
Authors: Eric L Hurwitz; Eugene J Carragee; Gabrielle van der Velde; Linda J Carroll; Margareta Nordin; Jaime Guzman; Paul M Peloso; Lena W Holm; Pierre Côté; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; J David Cassidy; Scott Haldeman Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2008-02-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Nadine S Matthie; Nicholas A Giordano; Coretta M Jenerette; Gayenell S Magwood; Sharon L Leslie; Emily E Northey; Caitlin I Webster; Soumitri Sil Journal: Pain Manag Date: 2022-09-13
Authors: Ulrik Röijezon; Gwendolen Jull; Christian Blandford; Anna Daniels; Peter Michaelson; Petros Karvelis; Julia Treleaven Journal: Front Pain Res (Lausanne) Date: 2022-07-06
Authors: Lisa Goudman; Julie Jansen; Maxime Billot; Nieke Vets; Ann De Smedt; Manuel Roulaud; Philippe Rigoard; Maarten Moens Journal: JMIR Serious Games Date: 2022-05-10 Impact factor: 3.364
Authors: Beatriz Brea-Gómez; Irene Torres-Sánchez; Araceli Ortiz-Rubio; Andrés Calvache-Mateo; Irene Cabrera-Martos; Laura López-López; Marie Carmen Valenza Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-11 Impact factor: 3.390