Literature DB >> 29018632

Patient-Specific Oscillometric Blood Pressure Measurement: Validation for Accuracy and Repeatability.

Jiankun Liu1, Hao-Min Cheng2, Chen-Huan Chen2, Shih-Hsien Sung2, Jin-Oh Hahn3, Ramakrishna Mukkamala1.   

Abstract

Oscillometric devices are widely used for automatic cuff blood pressure (BP) measurement. These devices estimate BP from the oscillometric cuff pressure waveform using population average methods. Hence, the devices may only be accurate over a limited BP range. The objective was to evaluate a new patient-specific method, which estimates BP by fitting a physiologic model to the same waveform. One-hundred and forty-five cardiac catheterization patients and normal adults were included for study. The oscillometric cuff pressure waveform was obtained with an office device, while reference BP was measured via brachial artery catheterization or auscultation, during baseline and/or nitroglycerin administration. Fifty-seven of the subject records were utilized for refining the patient-specific method, while the remaining 88 subject records were employed for evaluation. The precision errors for all BP levels of the patient-specific method ranged from 6.3 to 7.6 mmHg. These errors were significantly lower than those of the office device (by 29% on average) in subjects with high pulse pressure (>50 mmHg) while being comparable to those of the device in subjects with normal pulse pressure (<50 mmHg). The bias and precision of the differences in repeated estimates for all BP levels of the patient-specific method ranged from 0.1 to 1.1 and 2.1 to 5.9 mmHg, respectively. These precision differences were significantly lower than those of the office device (by 64% on average). The patient-specific method may afford more accurate automatic cuff BP measurement in patients with large artery stiffening while limiting the number of required cuff inflations/deflations per measurement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arterial stiffness; blood pressure measurement; cuff; oscillometry; parameter estimation; physiologic model

Year:  2016        PMID: 29018632      PMCID: PMC5477767          DOI: 10.1109/JTEHM.2016.2639481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med        ISSN: 2168-2372            Impact factor:   3.316


  16 in total

1.  Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: Part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research.

Authors:  Thomas G Pickering; John E Hall; Lawrence J Appel; Bonita E Falkner; John Graves; Martha N Hill; Daniel W Jones; Theodore Kurtz; Sheldon G Sheps; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2004-12-20       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Quantification of the calibration error in the transfer function-derived central aortic blood pressures.

Authors:  Yuan-Ta Shih; Hao-Min Cheng; Shih-Hsien Sung; Wei-Chih Hu; Chen-Huan Chen
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 2.689

3.  Effect of overcuffing on the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurements.

Authors:  Jennifer Ringrose; Jack Millay; Stephanie Ann Babwick; Molly Neil; Lee Ann Langkaas; Raj Padwal
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2015-05-07

4.  Patient-Specific Oscillometric Blood Pressure Measurement.

Authors:  Jiankun Liu; Hao-Min Cheng; Chen-Huan Chen; Shih-Hsien Sung; Mohsen Moslehpour; Jin-Oh Hahn; Ramakrishna Mukkamala
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  The auscultatory gap in sphygmomanometry.

Authors:  J M Askey
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Theory of the oscillometric maximum and the systolic and diastolic detection ratios.

Authors:  G Drzewiecki; R Hood; H Apple
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Characterization of the oscillometric method for measuring indirect blood pressure.

Authors:  L A Geddes; M Voelz; C Combs; D Reiner; C F Babbs
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Measurement of central aortic pulse pressure: noninvasive brachial cuff-based estimation by a transfer function vs. a novel pulse wave analysis method.

Authors:  Hao-Min Cheng; Shih-Hsien Sung; Yuan-Ta Shih; Shao-Yuan Chuang; Wen-Chung Yu; Chen-Huan Chen
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 2.689

9.  Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies.

Authors:  Sarah Lewington; Robert Clarke; Nawab Qizilbash; Richard Peto; Rory Collins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-12-14       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 10.  Oscillometric blood pressure measurement: progress and problems.

Authors:  G A van Montfrans
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.444

View more
  6 in total

1.  Toward Ubiquitous Blood Pressure Monitoring via Pulse Transit Time: Predictions on Maximum Calibration Period and Acceptable Error Limits.

Authors:  Ramakrishna Mukkamala; Jin-Oh Hahn
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Smartphone-based blood pressure monitoring via the oscillometric finger-pressing method.

Authors:  Anand Chandrasekhar; Chang-Sei Kim; Mohammed Naji; Keerthana Natarajan; Jin-Oh Hahn; Ramakrishna Mukkamala
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 17.956

3.  Central blood pressure for the management of hypertension: Is it a practical clinical tool in current practice?

Authors:  Hao-Min Cheng; Shao-Yuan Chuang; Tzung-Dau Wang; Kazuomi Kario; Peera Buranakitjaroen; Yook-Chin Chia; Romeo Divinagracia; Satoshi Hoshide; Huynh Van Minh; Jennifer Nailes; Sungha Park; Jinho Shin; Saulat Siddique; Jorge Sison; Arieska Ann Soenarta; Guru Prasad Sogunuru; Apichard Sukonthasarn; Jam Chin Tay; Boon Wee Teo; Yuda Turana; Narsingh Verma; Yuqing Zhang; Ji-Guang Wang; Chen-Huan Chen
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  The importance of pulse pressure on cardiovascular risk and total mortality in the general population: Is sex relevant?

Authors:  Marijana Tadic; Fosca Quarti-Trevano; Michele Bombelli; Rita Facchetti; Cesare Cuspidi; Giuseppe Mancia; Guido Grassi
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Central Blood Pressure Monitoring via a Standard Automatic Arm Cuff.

Authors:  Keerthana Natarajan; Hao-Min Cheng; Jiankun Liu; Mingwu Gao; Shih-Hsien Sung; Chen-Huan Chen; Jin-Oh Hahn; Ramakrishna Mukkamala
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Noninvasive estimation of aortic hemodynamics and cardiac contractility using machine learning.

Authors:  Vasiliki Bikia; Theodore G Papaioannou; Stamatia Pagoulatou; Georgios Rovas; Evangelos Oikonomou; Gerasimos Siasos; Dimitris Tousoulis; Nikolaos Stergiopulos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.