Literature DB >> 24766563

Impact of ICD artifact burden on late gadolinium enhancement cardiac MR imaging in patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia ablation.

Olurotimi Mesubi1, Ghada Ahmad, Jean Jeudy, Alejandro Jimenez, Richard Kuk, Anastasios Saliaris, Vincent See, Stephen Shorofsky, Timm Dickfeld.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) is the gold standard for myocardial scar evaluation. Although ideal for substrate assessment in ventricular tachycardia (VT), most patients have an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) at presentation for ablation. This study evaluates the ICD artifact burden during standard late gadolinium enhancement CMRI (LGE-CMRI) evaluation of myocardial scar in VT patients with ICDs.
METHODS: Thirty-one patients with ICD and cardiomyopathy underwent LGE-CMRI using 1.5-T magnetic resonance scanner before VT ablation. Using the American Heart Association (AHA) 17-segment model, short-axis LGE series were analyzed for artifact burden localization and assessment.
RESULTS: Preablation CMRI was performed in 31 patients with single chamber (n = 13), dual chamber (n = 11), and biventricular (n = 7) ICDs. Pre- and post-MRI ICD parameters were unchanged. All patients had susceptibility artifact and 51.6% (256 of 496) of segments were affected by artifact. The artifact area (178 ± 136 cm(2) ) resulted in an artifact burden of 54 ± 21% of the LV myocardial area (327 ± 15 cm(2) ). The anterior wall was most affected by artifact (89%) compared with 52%, 49%, and 23% in the lateral, septal, and inferior walls, respectively (P < 0.0001). The apical segments had more artifact burden (66%) than the mid (49%) and basal (44%) segments (P = 0.0005). Artifact area correlated with ICD-heart distance on anteroposterior chest radiograph (r = 0.42, P = 0.021) and body mass index (r = -0.48, P = 0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: Current clinical LGE-CMRI scar imaging protocols produce ICD artifacts that affect >50% of the LV myocardium and correlate with the ICD-heart distance. This significantly limits the application of CMRI for image-guided VT ablation. ©2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ICD; cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; late gadolinium enhancement; metal artifact; ventricular tachycardia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24766563     DOI: 10.1111/pace.12405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  14 in total

1.  Feasibility of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Wideband Protocol in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators and Its Utility for Defining Scar.

Authors:  Amita Singh; Keigo Kawaji; Neha Goyal; Noreen T Nazir; Andrew Beaser; Virginia O'Keefe-Baker; Karima Addetia; Roderick Tung; Peng Hu; Victor Mor-Avi; Amit R Patel
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 2.  Nuclear Imaging Guidance for Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias.

Authors:  John Duell; Vasken Dilsizian; Mark Smith; Wengen Chen; Timm Dickfeld
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Reducing cardiac implantable electronic device-induced artefacts in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Aino-Maija Vuorinen; Lauri Lehmonen; Jarkko Karvonen; Miia Holmström; Sari Kivistö; Touko Kaasalainen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 7.034

4.  Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Screening for Cardiac Sarcoidosis in Patients With Atrioventricular Block Requiring Temporary Pacing.

Authors:  Aino-Maija Vuorinen; Jukka Lehtonen; Sami Pakarinen; Miia Holmström; Sari Kivistö; Touko Kaasalainen
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 6.106

5.  Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with an Implantable Loop Recorder.

Authors:  Florian Blaschke; Philipp Lacour; Thula Walter; Alexander Wutzler; Martin Huemer; Abdul Parwani; Philipp Attanasio; Leif-Hendrik Boldt; Marcus Markowski; Timm Denecke; Wilhelm Haverkamp
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 6.  Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for Ventricular Arrhythmia Therapies in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Kivanc Yalin; Ebru Golcuk; Tolga Aksu
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-06-30

7.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using wideband sequences in patients with nonconditional cardiac implanted electronic devices.

Authors:  Duc H Do; Vaughn Eyvazian; Aileen J Bayoneta; Peng Hu; J Paul Finn; Jason S Bradfield; Kalyanam Shivkumar; Noel G Boyle
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 6.343

8.  Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation - The Right Approach for the Right Patient.

Authors:  Mouhannad M Sadek; Robert D Schaller; Gregory E Supple; David S Frankel; Michael P Riley; Mathew D Hutchinson; Fermin C Garcia; David Lin; Sanjay Dixit; Erica S Zado; David J Callans; Francis E Marchlinski
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2014-11-29

9.  Metabolic Scar Assessment with18F-FDG PET: Correlation to Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia Substrate and Successful Ablation Sites.

Authors:  Yousra Ghzally; Hasan Imanli; Mark Smith; Jagat Mahat; Wengen Chen; Alejandro Jimenez; Mariem A Sawan; Mohamed Aboel-Kassem F Abdelmegid; Hatem Abd El Rahman Helmy; Salwa Demitry; Vincent See; Stephen Shorofsky; Vasken Dilsizian; Timm Dickfeld
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 11.082

10.  Evaluation of image quality of wideband single-shot late gadolinium-enhancement MRI in patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device.

Authors:  Sarah M Schwartz; Ashitha Pathrose; Ali M Serhal; Ann B Ragin; Jessica Charron; Bradley P Knight; Rod S Passman; Ryan J Avery; Daniel Kim
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-11-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.