Literature DB >> 28993792

The price of whole-genome sequencing may be decreasing, but who will be sequenced?

Deborah A Marshall1, Karen V MacDonald1, Jill Oliver Robinson2, Lisa F Barcellos3, Milena Gianfrancesco3, Monica Helm4, Amy McGuire2, Robert C Green5, Michael P Douglas6, Michael A Goldman7, Kathryn A Phillips6,8.   

Abstract

AIM: Since whole-genome sequencing (WGS) information can have positive and negative personal utility for individuals, we examined predictors of willingness to pay (WTP) for WGS. PATIENTS &
METHODS: We surveyed two independent populations: adult patients (n = 203) and college seniors (n = 980). Ordinal logistic regression models were used to characterize the relationship between predictors and WTP.
RESULTS: Sex, age, education, income, genomic knowledge and knowing someone who had genetic testing or having had genetic testing done personally were associated with significantly higher WTP for WGS. After controlling for income and education, males were willing to pay more for WGS than females.
CONCLUSION: Differences in WTP may impact equity, coverage, affordability and access, and should be anticipated by public dialog about related health policy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  access to healthcare; attitude to health; healthcare costs; human genome; personalized medicine; whole genome sequencing; willingness-to-pay

Year:  2017        PMID: 28993792      PMCID: PMC5629976          DOI: 10.2217/pme-2016-0075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Per Med        ISSN: 1741-0541            Impact factor:   2.512


  30 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the factors associated with interest in predictive genetic testing for obesity, type II diabetes and heart disease.

Authors:  J Collins; L Ryan; H Truby
Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.089

2.  Willingness to pay for genetic testing: a study of attitudes in a Canadian population.

Authors:  N M Ries; R Hyde-Lay; T Caulfield
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  Insurance companies are slow to cover next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Shraddha Chakradhar
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 4.  Direct-to-consumer genomic testing: systematic review of the literature on user perspectives.

Authors:  Lesley Goldsmith; Leigh Jackson; Anita O'Connor; Heather Skirton
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 5.  Diagnostic clinical genome and exome sequencing.

Authors:  Leslie G Biesecker; Robert C Green
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Genomic and personalized medicine: foundations and applications.

Authors:  Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Huntington F Willard
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 7.012

7.  Parental perspective of the benefits of genetic testing in children with congenital deafness.

Authors:  E A Geelhoed; K Harrison; A Davey; I R Walpole
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Cancer patients acceptance, understanding, and willingness-to-pay for pharmacogenomic testing.

Authors:  Sinead Cuffe; Henrique Hon; Xin Qiu; Kimberly Tobros; Chung-Kwun Amy Wong; Bradley De Souza; Graham McFarlane; Sohaib Masroor; Abul K Azad; Ekta Hasani; Natalie Rozanec; Natasha Leighl; Shabbir Alibhai; Wei Xu; Amalia M Issa; Geoffrey Liu
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Genomic testing to determine drug response: measuring preferences of the public and patients using Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE).

Authors:  Mehdi Najafzadeh; Karissa M Johnston; Stuart J Peacock; Joseph M Connors; Marco A Marra; Larry D Lynd; Carlo A Marra
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  What are people willing to pay for whole-genome sequencing information, and who decides what they receive?

Authors:  Deborah A Marshall; Juan Marcos Gonzalez; F Reed Johnson; Karen V MacDonald; Amy Pugh; Michael P Douglas; Kathryn A Phillips
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Bridging the Gaps in Personalized Medicine Value Assessment: A Review of the Need for Outcome Metrics across Stakeholders and Scientific Disciplines.

Authors:  William S Bush; Jessica N Cooke Bailey; Mark F Beno; Dana C Crawford
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 2.000

2.  ShareDNA: a smartphone app to facilitate family communication of genetic results.

Authors:  Chethan Jujjavarapu; Jeevan Anandasakaran; Laura M Amendola; Cameron Haas; Elizabeth Zampino; Nora B Henrikson; Gail P Jarvik; Sean D Mooney
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.063

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.