Literature DB >> 24236642

A systematic review of the factors associated with interest in predictive genetic testing for obesity, type II diabetes and heart disease.

J Collins1, L Ryan, H Truby.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the future, it may be possible for individuals to take a genetic test to determine their genetic predisposition towards developing lifestyle-related chronic diseases. A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to identify the factors associated with an interest in having predictive genetic testing for obesity, type II diabetes and heart disease amongst unaffected adults.
METHODS: Ovid Medline, PsycINFO and EMBASE online databases were searched using predefined search terms. Publications meeting the inclusion criteria (English language, free-living adult population not selected as a result of their disease diagnosis, reporting interest as an outcome, not related to a single gene inherited disease) were assessed for quality and content. Narrative synthesis of the results was undertaken.
RESULTS: From the 2329 publications retrieved, eight studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Overall, the evidence base was small but of positive quality. Interest was associated with personal attitudes towards disease risk and the provision of information about genetic testing, shaped by perceived risk of disease and expected outcomes of testing. The role of demographic factors was investigated with largely inconclusive findings.
CONCLUSIONS: Interest in predictive genetic testing for obesity, type II diabetes or heart disease was greatest amongst those who perceived the risk of disease to be high and/or the outcomes of testing to be beneficial.
© 2013 The British Dietetic Association Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attitudes; chronic disease; diet-gene interactions; public health; systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24236642     DOI: 10.1111/jhn.12179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet        ISSN: 0952-3871            Impact factor:   3.089


  12 in total

1.  Factors affecting breast cancer patients' need for genetic risk information: From information insufficiency to information need.

Authors:  Soo Jung Hong; Barbara Biesecker; Jennifer Ivanovich; Melody Goodman; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Public Views on Genetics and Genetic Testing: A Survey of the General Public in Belgium.

Authors:  Davit Chokoshvili; Carmen Belmans; Roxanne Poncelet; Sofie Sanders; Deborah Vaes; Danya Vears; Sandra Janssens; Isabelle Huys; Pascal Borry
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2017-03

Review 3.  From the prodromal stage of multiple sclerosis to disease prevention.

Authors:  Ruth Ann Marrie; Mark Allegretta; Lisa F Barcellos; Bruce Bebo; Peter A Calabresi; Jorge Correale; Benjamin Davis; Philip L De Jager; Christiane Gasperi; Carla Greenbaum; Anne Helme; Bernhard Hemmer; Pamela Kanellis; Walter Kostich; Douglas Landsman; Christine Lebrun-Frenay; Naila Makhani; Kassandra L Munger; Darin T Okuda; Daniel Ontaneda; Ronald B Postuma; Jacqueline A Quandt; Sharon Roman; Shiv Saidha; Maria Pia Sormani; Jon Strum; Pamela Valentine; Clare Walton; Kathleen M Zackowski; Yinshan Zhao; Helen Tremlett
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 44.711

4.  The price of whole-genome sequencing may be decreasing, but who will be sequenced?

Authors:  Deborah A Marshall; Karen V MacDonald; Jill Oliver Robinson; Lisa F Barcellos; Milena Gianfrancesco; Monica Helm; Amy McGuire; Robert C Green; Michael P Douglas; Michael A Goldman; Kathryn A Phillips
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Racial and ethnic differences in knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing in the US: Systematic review.

Authors:  Juan R Canedo; Stephania T Miller; Hector F Myers; Maureen Sanderson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Associations of perceived norms with intentions to learn genomic sequencing results: Roles for attitudes and ambivalence.

Authors:  Allecia E Reid; Jennifer M Taber; Rebecca A Ferrer; Barbara B Biesecker; Katie L Lewis; Leslie G Biesecker; William M P Klein
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 4.267

7.  Preferences for the provision of whole genome sequencing services among young adults.

Authors:  Christopher H Wade; Kailyn R Elliott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Health orientation and individual tendencies of a sample of Italian genetic testing consumers.

Authors:  Serena Oliveri; Ilaria Durosini; Ilaria Cutica; Clizia Cincidda; Francesca Spinella; Marina Baldi; Alessandra Gorini; Gabriella Pravettoni
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.183

9.  "I think that a brief conversation from their provider can go a very long way": Patient and provider perspectives on barriers and facilitators of genetic testing after ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Adrianne R Mallen; Claire C Conley; Lindsay Fuzzell; Dana Ketcher; Bianca M Augusto; McKenzie McIntyre; Laura V Barton; Mary K Townsend; Brooke L Fridley; Shelley S Tworoger; Robert M Wenham; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Personalised nutrition technologies: a new paradigm for dietetic practice and training in a digital transformation era.

Authors:  M Abrahams; N V Matusheski
Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 3.089

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.