Literature DB >> 33407467

ShareDNA: a smartphone app to facilitate family communication of genetic results.

Chethan Jujjavarapu1, Jeevan Anandasakaran2, Laura M Amendola3, Cameron Haas4, Elizabeth Zampino2, Nora B Henrikson4, Gail P Jarvik3,5, Sean D Mooney6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Genetic testing allows patients and clinicians to understand the risk of hereditary diseases. By testing early, individuals can make informed medical decisions about management which may minimize the risk of developing certain diseases. Importantly, genetic test results may also be applicable to patients' biological relatives; thus, these results could also lead to minimizing their risk of disease. However, sharing genetic test results between patients and their relatives is scarce. The most frequently reported problems are that patients cannot clearly explain this information and relatives misinterpret the results. Smartphone apps in the healthcare field are a possible solution as they allow patients to accurately share sensitive information to others, while providing educational material to support understanding the information. However, these apps may not provide security to protect patients' identifiable information. We developed ShareDNA, a smartphone app that (1) allows patients to securely share their genetic test results with others, (2) provides information on how to interpret these results, and (3) minimizes the amount of patient information needed to use the service.
RESULTS: We recruited thirteen participants to test the usability of our app and provide feedback. We found overall that participants were comfortable with using this app and could easily learn each app function when filling out our questionnaire. Additionally, based on vocalized impressions of the usefulness of the app, participants indicated that the user-interface could be more intuitive and that we needed to add more text within the app to explain why ShareDNA is a secure service.
CONCLUSIONS: ShareDNA is a free smartphone app that allows patients to share their genetic test results with others, including their biological relatives. Sharing these results along with educational material will enable relatives to share accurate information and discuss their possible risk for disease with their clinical providers. As a result, appropriate testing in relatives could be improved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  App; Application; Cascade testing; Family communication; Genetic testing; Genetics; Smartphone

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33407467      PMCID: PMC7788871          DOI: 10.1186/s12920-020-00864-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Genomics        ISSN: 1755-8794            Impact factor:   3.063


  20 in total

1.  Family communication about positive BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic test results.

Authors:  Bobbi McGivern; Jessica Everett; Geoffrey G Yager; Robert C Baumiller; Amanda Hafertepen; Howard M Saal
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.822

2.  Genetic testing costs and compliance with clinical best practices.

Authors:  Kathleen Montanez; Taylor Berninger; Mary Willis; Aaron Harding; Monica A Lutgendorf
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Prophylactic surgery to reduce the risk of gynecologic cancers in the Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Kathleen M Schmeler; Henry T Lynch; Lee-may Chen; Mark F Munsell; Pamela T Soliman; Mary Beth Clark; Molly S Daniels; Kristin G White; Stephanie G Boyd-Rogers; Peggy G Conrad; Kathleen Y Yang; Mary M Rubin; Charlotte C Sun; Brian M Slomovitz; David M Gershenson; Karen H Lu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Recommendations for the care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to Lynch syndrome: a systematic review.

Authors:  Noralane M Lindor; Gloria M Petersen; Donald W Hadley; Anita Y Kinney; Susan Miesfeldt; Karen H Lu; Patrick Lynch; Wylie Burke; Nancy Press
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Characteristics of health information gatherers, disseminators, and blockers within families at risk of hereditary cancer: implications for family health communication interventions.

Authors:  Laura M Koehly; June A Peters; Regina Kenen; Lindsey M Hoskins; Anne L Ersig; Natalia R Kuhn; Jennifer T Loud; Mark H Greene
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 6.  The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care.

Authors:  Richard J Holden; Ben-Tzion Karsh
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 7.  The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behaviour change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: a systematic review.

Authors:  Caroline Free; Gemma Phillips; Leandro Galli; Louise Watson; Lambert Felix; Phil Edwards; Vikram Patel; Andy Haines
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 8.  Germline BRCA1/2 mutation testing is indicated in every patient with epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Marieke Arts-de Jong; Geertruida H de Bock; Christi J van Asperen; Marian J E Mourits; Joanne A de Hullu; C Marleen Kets
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  The price of whole-genome sequencing may be decreasing, but who will be sequenced?

Authors:  Deborah A Marshall; Karen V MacDonald; Jill Oliver Robinson; Lisa F Barcellos; Milena Gianfrancesco; Monica Helm; Amy McGuire; Robert C Green; Michael P Douglas; Michael A Goldman; Kathryn A Phillips
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 10.  The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Omri Gottesman; Helena Kuivaniemi; Gerard Tromp; W Andrew Faucett; Rongling Li; Teri A Manolio; Saskia C Sanderson; Joseph Kannry; Randi Zinberg; Melissa A Basford; Murray Brilliant; David J Carey; Rex L Chisholm; Christopher G Chute; John J Connolly; David Crosslin; Joshua C Denny; Carlos J Gallego; Jonathan L Haines; Hakon Hakonarson; John Harley; Gail P Jarvik; Isaac Kohane; Iftikhar J Kullo; Eric B Larson; Catherine McCarty; Marylyn D Ritchie; Dan M Roden; Maureen E Smith; Erwin P Böttinger; Marc S Williams
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Impact of Proband Indication for Genetic Testing on the Uptake of Cascade Testing Among Relatives.

Authors:  Tara J Schmidlen; Sara L Bristow; Kathryn E Hatchell; Edward D Esplin; Robert L Nussbaum; Eden V Haverfield
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Usefulness of mobile apps for communication of genetic test results to at-risk family members in a U.S. integrated health system: a qualitative approach from user-testing.

Authors:  Cameron B Haas; Aaron Scrol; Chethan Jujjavarapu; Gail P Jarvik; Nora B Henrikson
Journal:  Health Policy Technol       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 5.211

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.