Literature DB >> 22333900

Direct-to-consumer genomic testing: systematic review of the literature on user perspectives.

Lesley Goldsmith1, Leigh Jackson, Anita O'Connor, Heather Skirton.   

Abstract

Genetic tests have traditionally been offered by health professionals. However, genomic tests have been available direct to the consumer for the last decade, increasingly via the Internet. The aim of this systematic review was to ascertain the evidence concerning use of direct-to-consumer genomic testing from the consumer perspective. Primary research was identified using the search terms 'direct-to-consumer' and 'genomic or genetic' in six bibliographic databases and citation searching of findings. In all, 17 papers were reviewed: 3 qualitative and 14 quantitative. Findings indicate a low level of awareness of direct-to-consumer genomic testing and, because of the hypothetical nature of many studies, little evidence from users of such tests. Although potential users appear to be interested in information about their risks of developing common diseases, concerns were expressed about privacy of genetic risk information and the reliability of genomic tests. Consumers were anxious about the nature of the results. There appeared to be a preference to access genomic tests via a health professional, or to discuss the results and obtain advice from a health professional. Authors of only two papers recruited participants who had used direct-to-consumer tests and samples from the large quantitative studies were not representative of the population. These factors limit the value of the available evidence. However, we conclude that there is public interest in direct-to-consumer genomic tests, and that this is likely to result in an increased workload for a range of health professionals. We also consider that there are educational implications for both consumers and health professionals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22333900      PMCID: PMC3400732          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  31 in total

1.  Illusions of scientific legitimacy: misrepresented science in the direct-to-consumer genetic-testing marketplace.

Authors:  Amy B Vashlishan Murray; Michael J Carson; Corey A Morris; Jon Beckwith
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  EuroGentest patient information leaflets: a free resource available in over 20 languages.

Authors:  Celine Lewis; Alastair Kent; Heather Skirton; Domenico Coviello
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  An agenda for personalized medicine.

Authors:  Pauline C Ng; Sarah S Murray; Samuel Levy; J Craig Venter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Bradford W Hesse; David E Nelson; Gary L Kreps; Robert T Croyle; Neeraj K Arora; Barbara K Rimer; Kasisomayajula Viswanath
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005 Dec 12-26

5.  Genetic testing and common disorders in a public health framework.

Authors:  Carla G van El; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  The general public's understanding and perception of direct-to-consumer genetic test results.

Authors:  J W Leighton; K Valverde; B A Bernhardt
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Social networkers' attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.

Authors:  Amy L McGuire; Christina M Diaz; Tao Wang; Susan G Hilsenbeck
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.229

8.  Ten years of presymptomatic testing for Huntington's disease: the experience of the UK Huntington's Disease Prediction Consortium.

Authors:  P S Harper; C Lim; D Craufurd
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.318

9.  Characteristics of users of online personalized genomic risk assessments: implications for physician-patient interactions.

Authors:  Colleen M McBride; Sharon Hensley Alford; Robert J Reid; Eric B Larson; Andreas D Baxevanis; Lawrence C Brody
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  The feasibility of online genetic testing for lung cancer susceptibility: uptake of a web-based protocol and decision outcomes.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Della Brown White; Saskia C Sanderson; Isaac M Lipkus; Gerold Bepler; Lori A Bastian; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  38 in total

Review 1.  Incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing: a review.

Authors:  Z Lohn; S Adam; P H Birch; J M Friedman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Awareness, attitudes and perspectives of direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Greece: a survey of potential consumers.

Authors:  Vasiliki Mavroidopoulou; Ellie Xera; Vasiliki Mollaki
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 3.  Physician preparedness for big genomic data: a review of genomic medicine education initiatives in the United States.

Authors:  Caryn Kseniya Rubanovich; Cynthia Cheung; Jess Mandel; Cinnamon S Bloss
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  The effect of disease risk probability and disease type on interest in clinic-based versus direct-to-consumer genetic testing services.

Authors:  Kerry Sherman; Laura-Kate Shaw; Katrina Champion; Fernanda Caldeira; Margaret McCaskill
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-03-27

5.  Consumer familiarity, perspectives and expected value of personalized medicine with a focus on applications in oncology.

Authors:  Susan Garfeld; Michael P Douglas; Karen V MacDonald; Deborah A Marshall; Kathryn A Phillips
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 6.  Communication of cancer-related genetic and genomic information: A landscape analysis of reviews.

Authors:  Emily B Peterson; Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou; Anna Gaysynsky; Melinda Krakow; Ashley Elrick; Muin J Khoury; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 7.  Points to Consider: Ethical, Legal, and Psychosocial Implications of Genetic Testing in Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Botkin; John W Belmont; Jonathan S Berg; Benjamin E Berkman; Yvonne Bombard; Ingrid A Holm; Howard P Levy; Kelly E Ormond; Howard M Saal; Nancy B Spinner; Benjamin S Wilfond; Joseph D McInerney
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Public Attitudes Toward Direct to Consumer Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Grayson L Ruhl; James W Hazel; Ellen Wright Clayton; Bradley A Malin
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2020-03-04

9.  Primary care patients' views and decisions about, experience of and reactions to direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Katherine Wasson; Tonya Nashay Sanders; Nancy S Hogan; Sara Cherny; Kathy J Helzlsouer
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-07-07

10.  Providing Access to Genomic Variant Knowledge in a Healthcare Setting: A Vision for the ClinGen Electronic Health Records Workgroup.

Authors:  C L Overby; B Heale; S Aronson; J M Cherry; S Dwight; A Milosavljevic; T Nelson; A Niehaus; M A Weaver; E M Ramos; M S Williams
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 6.875

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.