Literature DB >> 28988333

Primary screw perforation or subsequent screw cut-out following proximal humerus fracture fixation using locking plates: a review of causative factors and proposed solutions.

Tristan E McMillan1, Alan J Johnstone2.   

Abstract

The surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures remains controversial primarily due to the high complication rate associated with the available fixation methods. In an attempt to reduce the incidence of serious complications and subsequent poor clinical outcomes, proximal humerus locking plates have become popular but even these implants cannot overcome the risk of complications, especially those associated with loss of fracture reduction and screw cut-out/migration through the humeral head. In an attempt to address these issues, we have reviewed the literature, investigating the most likely causes for these predominantly mechanical complications and propose technical solutions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fixation failure; Locking plate fixation; Osteoporosis; Proximal humerus fracture; Screw perforation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28988333     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-017-3652-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  48 in total

1.  Effect of screw placement on fixation in the humeral head.

Authors:  A S Liew; J A Johnson; S D Patterson; G J King; D G Chess
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Epidemiology of humerus fractures in the United States: nationwide emergency department sample, 2008.

Authors:  Sunny H Kim; Robert M Szabo; Richard A Marder
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.794

3.  Biomechanical analysis of proximal humeral fixation using locking plate fixation with an intramedullary fibular allograft.

Authors:  Craig Mathison; Rey Chaudhary; Lauren Beaupre; Mathew Reynolds; Samer Adeeb; Martin Bouliane
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  The cortical thickness of the proximal humeral diaphysis predicts bone mineral density of the proximal humerus.

Authors:  Markus J Tingart; Maria Apreleva; Dietrich von Stechow; David Zurakowski; Jon J Warner
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-05

5.  PEEK versus titanium locking plates for proximal humerus fracture fixation: a comparative biomechanical study in two- and three-part fractures.

Authors:  Benedikt Schliemann; Robert Seifert; Christina Theisen; Dominic Gehweiler; Dirk Wähnert; Martin Schulze; Michael J Raschke; Andre Weimann
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  The importance of medial support in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Michael J Gardner; Yoram Weil; Joseph U Barker; Bryan T Kelly; David L Helfet; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Surgical treatment of three and four-part proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Brian D Solberg; Charles N Moon; Dennis P Franco; Guy D Paiement
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 8.  Innovations in locking plate technology.

Authors:  George J Haidukewych
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 9.  Treatment of proximal humerus fractures with locking plates: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christos Thanasas; George Kontakis; Antonios Angoules; David Limb; Peter Giannoudis
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Bone properties of the humeral head and resistance to screw cutout.

Authors:  Lars Henrik Frich; Niels Christian Jensen
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2014-01
View more
  6 in total

1.  Shoulder function after helical long PHILOS plate.

Authors:  Tomas Da Silva; Franziska Rummel; Christian Knop; Tobias Merkle
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-02-24

2.  Open reduction and fixation with a locking plate without bone grafting is a reasonable and safe option for treating proximal humerus nonunion.

Authors:  Stefan Quadlbauer; Georg J Hofmann; Martin Leixnering; Rudolf Rosenauer; Thomas Hausner; Jürgen Reichetseder
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The potential of locking plate with intramedullary fibular allograft to manage proximal humeral fracture with an unstable medial column.

Authors:  Young-Kyu Kim; Suk-Woong Kang; Kyu-Hak Jung; Young-Kwang Oh
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  In-hospital Complications Are More Likely to Occur After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Than After Locked Plating for Proximal Humeral Fractures.

Authors:  Jeanette Köppe; Josef Stolberg-Stolberg; Robert Rischen; Andreas Faldum; Michael J Raschke; J Christoph Katthagen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Strut Support with Tricortical Iliac Allografts in Unstable Proximal Humerus Fractures: Surgical Indication and New Definition of Poor Medial Column Support.

Authors:  Seung-Jin Lee; Yoon-Suk Hyun; Seung-Ha Baek
Journal:  Clin Shoulder Elb       Date:  2019-03-01

6.  Factors associated with maintaining reduction following locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Martin Bouliane; Anelise Silveira; AlJarrah AlEidan; Luke Heinrichs; Sung Hyun Kang; David M Sheps; Lauren Beaupre
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-09-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.