Literature DB >> 32948917

The potential of locking plate with intramedullary fibular allograft to manage proximal humeral fracture with an unstable medial column.

Young-Kyu Kim1, Suk-Woong Kang2, Kyu-Hak Jung1, Young-Kwang Oh3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the potential of locking compression plate with intramedullary fibular allograft in managing proximal humeral fractures with an unstable medial column.
METHODS: Between March 2007 and March 2015, we retrospectively analyzed 63 patients who underwent locking plate fixation for proximal humeral fracture with an unstable medial column. All patients were assigned into group 1 (patients treated with locking plate) and group 2 (patients treated with locking plate with intramedullary fibular allograft). Groups 1 and 2 were composed of 29 and 34 patients, respectively. We analyzed bone union, the neck-shaft angle, the Constant score, the range of motion, and complications.
RESULTS: The mean average bone union time of the patients was 13.9 weeks in group 1 and 11.3 weeks in group 2. The average Constant score was 67.4 in group 1 and 73.6 in group 2 (p < 0.05). The mean preoperative NSA, postoperative NSA, and NSA at the last follow-up were 104.4°, 125.8°, and 115.8°, respectively, in group 1, and 109.0°, 130.3°, and 127.1°, respectively, in group 2. The mean forward flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation were 109.0°, 48.2°, 34.0°, and L5, respectively, in group 1, and 127.5°, 118.2°, 38.7°, and L1, respectively, in group 2. In group 1, avascular necrosis occurred in one patient and screw cutout in two patients. In group 2, screw cutout occurred in one patient.
CONCLUSION: In patients aged over 65 years with proximal humeral fractures, an unstable medial column was associated with poor clinical results owing to varus collapse. To prevent this, an intramedullary fibular allograft was used, and radiologic and clinical results were better with this approach than with a locking plate alone. Therefore, locking plate fixation using a fibular allograft is one of the possible treatments for patients with an unstable medial column.
© 2020. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elderly patients; Fibular allograft; Locking plate fixation; Proximal humeral fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32948917     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03604-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  28 in total

1.  Update in the epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Mika Palvanen; Pekka Kannus; Seppo Niemi; Jari Parkkari
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Rate of avascular necrosis following proximal humerus fractures treated with a lateral locking plate and endosteal implant.

Authors:  Andrew S Neviaser; Carolyn M Hettrich; Joshua S Dines; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 3.  Proximal humeral fracture treatment in adults.

Authors:  Dirk Maier; Martin Jaeger; Kaywan Izadpanah; Peter C Strohm; Norbert P Suedkamp
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Difficulty in decision making in the treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures: the effect of uncertainty on surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Joey LaMartina; Kaitlyn N Christmas; Peter Simon; Jonathan J Streit; Jesse W Allert; Jonathan Clark; Randall J Otto; Adham Abdelfattah; Mark A Mighell; Mark A Frankle
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Functional outcome after minimally displaced fractures of the proximal part of the humerus.

Authors:  K J Koval; M A Gallagher; J G Marsicano; F Cuomo; A McShinawy; J D Zuckerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Operative versus non-operative treatment for two-part surgical neck fractures of the proximal humerus.

Authors:  O Hauschild; G Konrad; L Audige; P de Boer; S M Lambert; R Hertel; N P Südkamp
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Prognostic factors for unstable proximal humeral fractures treated with locking-plate fixation.

Authors:  Churl-Woo Lee; Sang-Jin Shin
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Indirect medial reduction and strut support of proximal humerus fractures using an endosteal implant.

Authors:  Michael J Gardner; Sreevathsa Boraiah; David L Helfet; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  Results of plate fixation for humerus fractures in a large single-center cohort.

Authors:  B J M van de Wall; C Ganzert; C Theus; R J H van Leeuwen; B C Link; R Babst; Frank J P Beeres
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Fracture displacement and screw cutout after open reduction and locked plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures [corrected].

Authors:  Kevin C Owsley; John T Gorczyca
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effects of fibular strut augmentation for the open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei Nie; Zhaojun Wang; Fei Gu; Shizhuang Xu; Yang Yue; Anze Shao; Kefu Sun
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 2.677

2.  Application of a lateral intertubercular sulcus plate in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Dong Li; WenXue Lv; WenMing Chen; Jing Meng; Song Liu; ZongKang Duan; Bo Yu
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Evaluation of mushroom-shaped allograft for unstable proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Lukas Dankl; Werner Schmoelz; Romed Hoermann; Simon Euler
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 3.067

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.