Literature DB >> 28988257

Clinical and Prognostic Significance of Pathological and Inflammatory Markers in Mucinous Rectal Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Curative Surgery.

Jian Zhao1, Jian Xu1, Rui Zhang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and prognostic significance of pathological and inflammatory marker in mucinous rectal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and curative surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively evaluated the patient records of mucinous rectal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and curative surgery at Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute from January 2006 to December 2013. The relationship between overall survival (OS) and clinicopathologic variables, pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), pretreatment platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), pretreatment lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and other biomarkers were analyzed by using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank testing. Subsequently a Cox proportional hazard model was used to calculate hazard ratios for the risk of death. RESULTS A total of 100 mucinous rectal cancer patients were included for analysis during the study period. The median age at presentation was 60.5 years (range, 26-81 years). The median overall survival (OS) for the whole group was 94 months. On univariate analysis, time interval from CCRT to operation (HR 0.37, p=0.03), lymphovascular invasion (HR 3.23, p=0.009), pretreatment NLR (HR 3.87, p=0.012), and LMR (HR 0.31, p=0.002) were significant prognostic factors for OS. In a multivariate analysis, pretreatment LMR was found to be an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (HR, 0.43; 95%CI, 0.18 to 1.00, p=0.045). CONCLUSIONS Pretreatment lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio is a useful prognostic marker of OS in patients with mucinous rectal carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and curative surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28988257      PMCID: PMC5644457          DOI: 10.12659/msm.904116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Monit        ISSN: 1234-1010


Background

Colorectal cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in males and the second in females, with over 1.2 million new cancer cases and 608 700 deaths estimated to have occurred in 2008 [1]. Mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) is an uncommon and rare histopathological type of colorectal cancer, accounting for 4% to 15% of cases of primary colorectal cancer [2-4]. According to the World Health Organization definition, MAC is diagnosed when the extracellular mucin cover 50% of the lesion or more [5]. Although rectal cancer is a type of colorectal cancer, the management of rectal cancer is different from that of colon cancer due to its higher postoperative recurrence [6-8]. Currently, the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (T3/4 or lymph node-positive) is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by curative surgery [9,10]. Although the prognosis of locally advanced rectal cancer has been significantly improved, about 5–10% of these patients develop recurrence [11,12], and there is marked heterogeneity in the duration of survival among these patients. Therefore, it is necessary to identify patients at greatest risk of worse outcomes by using clinical, inflammatory, and molecular biomarkers. For the past decade, there has been a growing consensus that inflammation is involved in the development and progression of malignant tumors, including colorectal carcinoma [13]. An inflammatory microenvironment promotes the development of tumors by promoting angiogenesis and metastasis, subverting adaptive immune responses, and altering responses to hormones and chemotherapeutic agents [14,15]. Recently, the markers of systematic inflammatory response, such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), have been reported to be associated with pathological complete response [16-19] and prognosis of colorectal cancer [20-24]. However, all of these reports included all histopathological types of colorectal cancer, and there have been no reports on the predictive role of systematic inflammatory response in mucinous rectal cancer. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of pathological and inflammatory markers in mucinous rectal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and curative surgery.

Ethics statement

The Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute Ethics Institution Office approved this study. This retrospective study posed no potential risk to the subjects, and the subjects’ personal privacy was protected. This study strictly conformed to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Material and Methods

Patients

The medical records of patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgical resection at Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute from 2006 to 2013 with a diagnosis of mucinous rectal cancer were retrieved from our department. Inclusion criteria were: patients aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed clinical stage T3/4 or node-positive disease, located within 10 cm of the anal verge, rectal cancer as a single primary tumor, completed neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and received radical surgery.

Clinical variables and definitions

Data on sex, age at diagnosis, date of diagnosis, pathological diagnosis, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, dose of radiation, time interval from concurrent chemoradiotherapy to operation, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, preoperative α-fetoprotein (AFP) levels, and pathologic features (lymphovascular and perineural invasion) were obtained by reviewing the medical records. All tumors were staged according to the TNM staging system of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (7th version, 2009). Routine laboratory measurements were performed before neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Data on hemoglobin (HB), neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, and platelet count were used to calculate NLR, PLR, and LMR. The cut-off CEA and AFP concentrations were 5.0 and 10 ng/d, respectively, which in our laboratory was the CEA concentration considered abnormal. NLR was defined as a simple ratio of the absolute neutrophil count over lymphocyte count. PLR was defined as the ratio of the platelet count over the absolute lymphocyte count. LMR was defined as the ratio of the absolute lymphocyte count over the monocyte count. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients and the study procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee of Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute.

Follow-up

Patients were followed at 3-month intervals for 2 years, at 6-month intervals for the next 3 years, and annually thereafter. The date of last follow-up was March 2016, which was mainly made with telephone calls. Recurrence was determined by clinical and radiologic examination or histologic confirmation. The main pattern of recurrence was recorded as the first site of detectable failure during the follow-up period. Disease-free survival (DFS) was the time from the surgery to the local or distant failure. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy to death induced by all causes, or end of follow-up.

Statistical analysis

Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. The comparison of the survival curves was performed by log-rank test. A multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors of overall survival. Every variable was analyzed by univariate analysis to cover all potentially important predictors, then variables with P≤0.10 in univariate analysis were included in multivariable analysis. This level was chosen to incorporate all potentially important predictor variables in the final modeling process. All sets of variables were analyzed: sex, clinical T stage, clinical N stage, AJCC stage, tumor size, interval from CCRT to operation, total dose of radiation, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, preoperative HB, CEA and AFP levels, and preoperative NLR, PLR, and LMR levels. The optimal cut-off values of NLR, PLR, and LMR were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, using OS as the end-point. Statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS16.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Patient characteristics

The clinical and pathological characteristics of 100 patients (male-to-female ratio: 2.33: 1) are summarized in Table 1. The median age was 60.5 (26–81 years). The mean preoperative CEA and AFP level was 10.0 U/ml (range 0.48–184 U/ml) and 3.75 U/ml (1.05–22.2), including 18 patients with stage II disease and 82 patients with stage III disease. All patients received intensity-modulated radiation therapy to the pelvis of 45–50 Gy and a concomitant boost of 5 Gy to the primary tumor in 25 fractions. A total of 30 (30%) patients received oral capecitabine alone concurrent with radiotherapy, 65 (65%) patients received both capecitabine and oxaliplatin, and 5 (5%) patients received both oxaliplatin and irinotecan. The median interval between the completion of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery was 7 weeks (range 2–12 weeks) (Table 1).
Table 1

Clinicopathologic characteristics of 100 mucinous rectal cancer patients.

VariableValue
Median age (range), y60.5 (26–81)
Gender, n
 Male70
 Female30
Tumor size, cm
 ≥59
 <591
T stage, n
 T358
 T442
Lymph node involvement, n
 N(−)19
 N(+)81
Stage, n
 II18
 III82
Interval from CCRT to operation (wk)
 <764
 ≥736
Total dose of radiotherapy (Gy)
 <5023
 ≥5077
Chemotherapy regimens
 Capecitabine30
 L-OHP+ capecitabine65
 CPT-11+capecitabine5
Initial HB
 <108
 ≥1092
Preoperative CEA levels
 Mean (range), U/ml10 (0.48–184)
Preoperative AFP levels
 Mean (range), U/ml3.75 (1.05–22.2)
Lymphovascular invasion, n
 Positive12
 Negative88
Perineural invasion, n
 Positive14
 Negative86

The optimal cut-off value for inflammation-based scores

ROCs were performed, and the optimal threshold of inflammation-based score was obtained when the Youden index was maximal. The optimal cut-off points of NLR, PLR, and LMR were 2.25 (Youden index, 0.289), 155 (Youden index, 0.257) and 3 (Youden index, 0.371), respectively. Patients were divided into low and high groups based on these cut-off values. In terms of the LMR, 32 (32%) patients had a low LMR and 68 (68%) had a high LMR. For the NLR, 34 patients (34%) were in the low group, whereas 66 (66%) were in the high group. For the PLR, 50 (52%) patients were in the low group, whereas 48 (48%) were in the high group.

Pattern of failure

After a median follow-up of 45.5 months, a total of 34 mucinous rectal cancer developed recurrence. The specific sites of recurrence were listed in Table 2. Estimated 5-year DFS rate was 63.3±4.9%. The most common site was lung metastasis (35.3%) and local recurrence (26.5%).
Table 2

Pattern of recurrence.

Recurrence sitesMAC, n (%)
Total34*
Local recurrence9
Liver7
Lung12
Bone2
Lymph node6

One MAC patient relapsed with lymph node and liver metastasis; another MAC patient relapsed with liver and lung metastasis.

Treatment outcome

The median overall survival (OS) for the whole series was 94 months. The estimated 5-year OS rate was 76.8±4.6%. The cumulative 5-year survival was 81.4% for the lymphovascular invasion-positive group and 42.9% for lymphovascular invasion-negative group (p=0.005). Additionally, estimated 5-year OS for interval from CCRT to operation more than 7 weeks was also significantly higher than for interval from CCRT to operation less than 7 weeks (82.9% versus 42.9%, p=0.023).

Analysis of prognostic factors for overall survival

On univariate analysis, interval from CCRT to operation (Figure 1B), lymphovascular invasion (Figure 1A), NLR (Figure 1C), and LMR (Figure 1D) were significantly predictive for longer survival (Table 3), whereas sex, tumor size, and T stage were insignificant variables.
Figure 1

Univariate analyses for prognostic variable of overall survival: (A) Interval from CCRT to operation (<7 weeks versus ≥7 weeks); (B) Lymphovascular invasion (negative versus positive); (C) Pretreatment NLR (<2.25 versus ≥2.25); (D) LMR (<3 versus ≥3).

Table 3

Predictive factors for overall survival by univariate and multivariate analyses of the cohort (n=100).

FactorsUnivariate analysisMultivariate analysis
HR95% CIpHR95% CIp
Gender
 Female1
 Male1.130.55–2.330.74
T stage
 T31
 T41.130.55–2.330.74
N stage
 N(−)1
 N(+)0.850.36–1.990.70
Stage
 II1
 III0.960.39–2.350.92
Preoperative HB level
 <101
 ≥101.470.35–6.210.60
Tumor size, cm
 <51
 ≥51.750.61–5.030.30
Interval from CCRT to operation, wk
 <711
 ≥70.370.15–0.910.030.490.20–1.230.13
Total dose of RT, Gy
 <501
 ≥500.900.41–1.950.79
Preoperative AFP levels, U/ml
 <101
 ≥100.910.12–6.720.93
Preoperative CEA levels, U/ml
 <51
 ≥51.690.81–3.550.17
Lymphovascular invasion
 Negative11
 Positive3.231.35–7.750.0092.290.92–5.740.076
Perineural invasion
 Negative1
 Positive1.680.68–4.120.26
NLR
 Low (<2.25)11
 High (≥2.25)3.871.35–11.110.0122.870.87–9.430.082
PLR
 Low (<150)11
 High (≥150)2.000.93–4.300.0740.700.27–1.800.46
LMR
 Low (<3)11
 High (≥3)0.310.14–0.640.0020.430.18–1.000.045
In Cox proportional hazard model, pretreatment LMR was found to be an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95%CI, 0.18 to 1.00, p=0.045) (Table 3).

Discussion

It has been recognized that MAC of the rectum is a rare and distinctive type of cancer. Previous studies demonstrated that mucinous carcinoma is associated with a larger diameter, higher T classification, and extrahepatic localization of metastases [25-27], and the prognosis of patients with MAC was worse than that of non-MAC colorectal cancer. Consistent with previous studies, the estimated 5-year DFS and OS rates were 63.3% and 76.8%, respectively. We then analyzed clinical factors or treatment variables that are associated with overall survival in mucinous rectal cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and curative surgery. Our univariate results show that the interval from CCRT to operation (HR 0.37, p=0.03), lymphovascular invasion (HR 3.23, p=0.009), pretreatment NLR (HR 3.87, p=0.012), and LMR (HR 0.31, p=0.002) are significant prognostic factors for OS. Multivariate analysis results show pretreatment LMR is an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.43, p=0.045). The benefit of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer is well established in several phase III trials due to its reduced local recurrence [28,29], but the best interval between neoadjuvant therapy and surgical treatment is still undetermined. It seems that the radiotherapy-induced necrosis might be time-dependent; thus, a controlled postponement of surgery would allow a potentiation of the effect, maximizing the benefits of neoadjuvant therapy. Francois et al. [30] demonstrated that a longer interval between neoadjuvant radiation and surgery was associated with improved tumor clinical response and pathologic downstaging. Recently, Wang et al. performed a meta-analysis and also found that there was a significantly increased rate of pathological complete response in rectal cancer patients treated with surgery followed 7 or 8 weeks later by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (RR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.18–1.78; and p<0.01 and RR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.15–1.92; and p=0.002, respectively) [31]. In the present, we found that estimated 5-year OS for the interval from CCRT to operation more than 7 weeks is significantly higher than for the interval from CCRT to operation less than 7 weeks (82.9% versus 42.9%, p=0.023). On univariate analysis, the interval from CCRT to operation is a significant predictor for OS, but it became non-significant in multivariate analysis. Several previous studies have demonstrated that positive lymphovascular invasion is a predictor of poorer OS in colorectal cancer patients [26,27,32]. Consistent with the published data, we also found that lymphovascular invasion is a significant predictor for OS in mucinous rectal cancer in univariate analysis, but it is not an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in multivariate analysis. More and more evidence indicates that cancer-related inflammation is involved in cancer development and progression [33,34]. Neutrophilia, thrombocytosis, monocytosis, and lymphopenia tend to represent a nonspecific response to cancer-related inflammation and are associated with poor survival in cancers [34,35]. Neutrophils interact with tumor cells by producing cytokines and chemokines, which affects tumor cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and metastases [36]. Tumor-associated macrophages, which arise from blood monocytes, promote tumor progression and metastases [37]. Chan et al. found that the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio was an independent predictor of OS in patients with CRC undergoing curative resection [23]. Shibutani et al. [21] demonstrated that postoperative NLR was an independent prognostic factor in patients with CRC who underwent potentially curative surgery. However, the prognostic role of inflammatory indexes in mucinous rectal cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and curative surgery remains undetermined. As inflammation-based indexes are simple and comprise components of blood assay with low cost, the establishment of a predictive model based on inflammation is useful, especially for patients in developing countries. In our study, we show that pretreatment NLR and LMR are significant prognostic factors for OS in these patients. Multivariate analysis results show that pretreatment LMR is an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.43, p=0.045). The main advantage of the present study is that it is one of the largest series evaluating the treatment outcomes of mucinous rectal cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and curative surgery. However, there are several limitations in this study. The major limitation is that it is a retrospective study, which could result in various sources of bias. However, it appears difficult to conduct a randomized trial for this rare disease. Secondly, this is a single-institution study; thus, the findings of this study might not be applicable to other cohorts of patients. Additionally, we evaluated patients who were treated over the course of 7 years. The radiotherapy and chemotherapy regimens may have changed over time.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this large retrospective study demonstrates that pretreatment LMR is an independent clinical predictor for overall survival in patients with mucinous rectal carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and curative surgery. These findings may help clinicians predict the prognosis of mucinous rectal carcinoma and develop individualized treatment strategies.
  36 in total

1.  Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jean-François Bosset; Laurence Collette; Gilles Calais; Laurent Mineur; Philippe Maingon; Ljiljana Radosevic-Jelic; Alain Daban; Etienne Bardet; Alexander Beny; Jean-Claude Ollier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Platelets, cyclooxygenases, and colon cancer.

Authors:  Paloma Guillem-Llobat; Melania Dovizio; Sara Alberti; Annalisa Bruno; Paola Patrignani
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 3.  Neoadjuvant Combined-Modality Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer and Its Future Direction.

Authors:  Mohamed E Salem; Marion Hartley; Keith Unger; John L Marshall
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.990

4.  Preoperative radiotherapy with or without concurrent fluorouracil and leucovorin in T3-4 rectal cancers: results of FFCD 9203.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Gérard; Thierry Conroy; Franck Bonnetain; Olivier Bouché; Olivier Chapet; Marie-Thérèse Closon-Dejardin; Michel Untereiner; Bernard Leduc; Eric Francois; Jean Maurel; Jean-François Seitz; Bruno Buecher; Rémy Mackiewicz; Michel Ducreux; Laurent Bedenne
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 randomized phase III trial after a median follow-up of 11 years.

Authors:  Rolf Sauer; Torsten Liersch; Susanne Merkel; Rainer Fietkau; Werner Hohenberger; Clemens Hess; Heinz Becker; Hans-Rudolf Raab; Marie-Therese Villanueva; Helmut Witzigmann; Christian Wittekind; Tim Beissbarth; Claus Rödel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Cancer-related inflammation and treatment effectiveness.

Authors:  Connie I Diakos; Kellie A Charles; Donald C McMillan; Stephen J Clarke
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Elevated neutrophil and monocyte counts in peripheral blood are associated with poor survival in patients with metastatic melanoma: a prognostic model.

Authors:  H Schmidt; L Bastholt; P Geertsen; I J Christensen; S Larsen; J Gehl; H von der Maase
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  The prognostic value of pretreatment of systemic inflammatory responses in patients with urothelial carcinoma undergoing radical cystectomy.

Authors:  J H Ku; M Kang; H S Kim; C W Jeong; C Kwak; H H Kim
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Prognostic comparison between mucinous and nonmucinous adenocarcinoma in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jong Seob Park; Jung Wook Huh; Yoon Ah Park; Yong Beom Cho; Seong Hyeon Yun; Hee Cheol Kim; Woo Yong Lee; Ho-Kyung Chun
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  The Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio is a Superior Predictor of Overall Survival in Comparison to Established Biomarkers of Resectable Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Joseph C Y Chan; David L Chan; Connie I Diakos; Alexander Engel; Nick Pavlakis; Anthony Gill; Stephen J Clarke
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  6 in total

1.  Combined fibrinogen-to-pre-albumin ratio and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 score is a promising metric to predict progression of metastatic colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yu-Cui Liao; Ming Fu; Xue-Feng Wang; Xue-Xin Cheng
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Prognostic value of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for solid tumors: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuming Long; Yingtian Zhang; Liwei Ni; Xuya Yuan; Yuanliang Liu; Jialong Tao; Yusong Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  [Prognostic Value of Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio in Patients 
with Lung Adenocarcinoma Treated with Radical Dissection].

Authors:  Gaoxiang Wang; Ran Xiong; Hanran Wu; Guangwen Xu; Caiwei Li; Xiaohui Sun; Mingran Xie
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2018-08-20

4.  Meta-Analysis on the Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in Rectal Cancer Treated With Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: Prognostic Value of Pre- and Post-Chemoradiotherapy Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio.

Authors:  Soo Jin Lee; Kyubo Kim; Hae Jin Park
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Histopathological Analysis of 173 Consecutive Patients with Colorectal Carcinoma: A Pathologist's View.

Authors:  Ceren Canbey Göret; Nuri Emrah Göret
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-09-26

6.  The prognostic utility of pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte-ratio (NLR) in colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mate Naszai; Alina Kurjan; Timothy S Maughan
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 4.452

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.