Literature DB >> 28986691

Spinal motion preservation surgery: indications and applications.

Ioannis D Gelalis1, Dimitrios V Papadopoulos2,3, Dionysios K Giannoulis1, Andreas G Tsantes1, Anastasios V Korompilias1.   

Abstract

Fusion is one of the most commonly performed spinal procedures, indicated for a wide range of spinal problems. Elimination of motion though results in accelerated degeneration of the adjacent level, known as adjacent level disease. Motion preservation surgical methods were developed in order to overcome this complication. These methods include total disc replacement, laminoplasty, interspinous implants and dynamic posterior stabilization systems. The initial enthusiasm about these methods was followed by certain concerns about their clinical usefulness and their results. The main indications for total disc replacement are degenerative disc disease, but the numerous contraindications for this method make it difficult to find the right candidate. Application of interspinous implants has shown good results in patients with spinal stenosis, but a more precise definition is needed regarding the severity of spinal stenosis up to which these implants can be used. Laminoplasty has several advantages and less complications compared to fusion and laminectomy in patients with cervical myelopathy/radiculopathy. Dynamic posterior stabilization could replace conventional fusion in certain cases, but also in this case the results are successful only in mild to moderate cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dynamic posterior stabilization; Interspinous implants; Laminoplasty; Total disc replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28986691     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-017-2052-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  58 in total

1.  Radiographic and clinical results of posterior dynamic stabilization for the treatment of multisegment degenerative disc disease with a minimum follow-up of 3 years.

Authors:  Shang-Won Yu; Cheng-Yo Yen; Chin-Hsien Wu; Feng-Chen Kao; Yu-Hsien Kao; Yuan-Kun Tu
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Superiority of multilevel cervical arthroplasty outcomes versus single-level outcomes: 229 consecutive PCM prostheses.

Authors:  Luiz Pimenta; Paul C McAfee; Andy Cappuccino; Bryan W Cunningham; Roberto Diaz; Etevaldo Coutinho
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Interlaminar spacer: a review of its mechanism, application, and efficacy.

Authors:  Thomas P Lo; Simon S Salerno; Austin R T Colohan
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.104

4.  Retrieval analysis of PEEK rods for posterior fusion and motion preservation.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Todd H Lanman; Genymphas Higgs; Daniel W Macdonald; Sigurd H Berven; Jorge E Isaza; Eual Phillips; Marla J Steinbeck
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Interspinous spacers in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal disease: our experience with DIAM and Aperius devices.

Authors:  Antonio P Fabrizi; Raffaella Maina; Luigi Schiabello
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Analysis of complications in patients treated with the X-Stop Interspinous Process Decompression System: proposal for a novel anatomic scoring system for patient selection and review of the literature.

Authors:  Giuseppe M V Barbagallo; Giuseppe Olindo; Leonardo Corbino; Vincenzo Albanese
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Laminoplasty after anterior spinal fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Chun-Hong Pang; Hon-Bong Leung; Chi-Hung Yen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.118

8.  Intraoperative spinal cord monitoring of C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty.

Authors:  Makoto Yanase; Yukihiro Matsuyama; Kikuko Mori; Yuka Nakamichi; Takako Yano; Takahiro Naruse; Yoshihito Sakai; Shiro Imagama; Zenya Ito; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Mitsuhiro Kamiya; Keigo Ito; Tokumi Kanemura; Koji Sato; Hisashi Iwata
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2010-05

Review 9.  Interspinous distractor devices for the management of lumbar spinal stenosis: a miracle cure for a common problem?

Authors:  Anouk Borg; Besnik Nurboja; Jake Timothy; David Choi
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 1.596

10.  Complications of Lumbar Artificial Disc Replacement Compared to Fusion: Results From the Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter US Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study of the Charité Artificial Disc.

Authors:  Richard T Holt; Mohammed E Majd; Jorge E Isaza; Scott L Blumenthal; Paul C McAfee; Richard D Guyer; Stephen H Hochschuler; Fred H Geisler; Rolando Garcia; John J Regan
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2007-02-01
View more
  1 in total

1.  Clinical comparison between simple laminectomy and laminectomy plus posterior instrumentation in surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  G Gargiulo; M Girardo; A Rava; A Coniglio; P Cinnella; A Massè; F Fusini
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-02-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.