Literature DB >> 20068473

Intraoperative spinal cord monitoring of C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty.

Makoto Yanase1, Yukihiro Matsuyama, Kikuko Mori, Yuka Nakamichi, Takako Yano, Takahiro Naruse, Yoshihito Sakai, Shiro Imagama, Zenya Ito, Yasutsugu Yukawa, Mitsuhiro Kamiya, Keigo Ito, Tokumi Kanemura, Koji Sato, Hisashi Iwata.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective study of C5 palsy after laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy.
OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to investigate the morphologic characteristic of C5 palsy patients undergoing cervical laminoplasty with the intraoperative motor-evoked potential (MEP). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A study reported prophylactic foraminotomy for C5 paralysis after laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy. However, no indications have been established. There have been few reports on the intraoperative monitoring of the C5 palsy. This palsy is reported to happen a few days after the surgery in many cases, and the possibility of its detection by intraoperative spinal cord monitoring is unclear.
METHODS: Of 153 patients with cervical myelopathy, 9 showed a decrease in upper muscle strength by 1 grade or more by postoperative manual muscle test. Of the 9 patients, 4 patients underwent segmental monitoring of upper limbs by MEP and were included in the paralysis group. Of the 153 patients, 74 (444 muscles) in whom both preoperative and postoperative manual muscle test of the upper limbs showed grade 5, and in whom the MEP monitoring of all these muscles was performed, were included in the nonparalysis group. We investigated the presence of intraoperative changes in 4 MEP parameters: amplitude, latency, duration, and waveform pattern, and the presence of foraminal stenosis in the cross-sectional view of preoperative myelographic computed tomography.
RESULTS: In the paralysis group (9 muscles) and nonparalysis group (444 muscles), delay in latency was not observed in any muscle (0% and 0%), and 50% or more reduction of amplitude in 1 muscle (11%) and 22 (5%), prolongation of duration in 1 (11%) and 6 (1%), changes of waveform pattern in 3 (33%) and 40 (9%), and foraminal stenosis in 5 (56%) and 80 (18%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In the paralysis group, the incidences of waveform pattern change on intraoperative MEP and stenosis of the intervertebral foramen were higher than those in the nonparalysis group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20068473     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31819e91b4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  10 in total

1.  Factors associated with postoperative C5 palsy after expansive open-door laminoplasty: retrospective cohort study using multivariable analysis.

Authors:  Takashi Tsuji; Morio Matsumoto; Masaya Nakamura; Ken Ishii; Nobuyuki Fujita; Kazuhiro Chiba; Kota Watanabe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Analysis of correlative risk factors for C5 palsy after anterior cervical decompression and fusion.

Authors:  Haiying Wang; Xu Zhang; Bing Lv; Wenyuan Ding; Yong Shen; Dalong Yang; Zhilong Bai
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-03-15

Review 3.  Spinal motion preservation surgery: indications and applications.

Authors:  Ioannis D Gelalis; Dimitrios V Papadopoulos; Dionysios K Giannoulis; Andreas G Tsantes; Anastasios V Korompilias
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-10-06

4.  C5 palsy after insertion of a winged expandable cervical cage: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Lorenzo Nigro; Roberto Tarantino; Pasquale Donnarumma; Antonio Santoro; Roberto Delfini
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06

5.  Can intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring during cervical spine decompression predict post-operative segmental C5 palsy?

Authors:  Siavash S Haghighi; Donald J Blaskiewicz; Bertha Ramirez; Richard Zhang
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-09

6.  Prevalence of C5 nerve root palsy after cervical decompressive surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fenyong Shou; Zhe Li; Huan Wang; Chongnan Yan; Qi Liu; Chi Xiao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Incidence and risk factors of C5 palsy following posterior cervical decompression: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yifei Gu; Peng Cao; Rui Gao; Ye Tian; Lei Liang; Ce Wang; Lili Yang; Wen Yuan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Efficacy of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Using Transcranial Electrically Stimulated Muscle-evoked Potentials (TcE-MsEPs) for Predicting Postoperative Segmental Upper Extremity Motor Paresis After Cervical Laminoplasty.

Authors:  Yasushi Fujiwara; Hideki Manabe; Bunichiro Izumi; Hiroyuki Tanaka; Kazumi Kawai; Nobuhiro Tanaka
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.876

9.  C5 Palsy After Cervical Spine Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Review of 59 Cases.

Authors:  Sara E Thompson; Zachary A Smith; Wellington K Hsu; Ahmad Nassr; Thomas E Mroz; David E Fish; Jeffrey C Wang; Michael G Fehlings; Chadi A Tannoury; Tony Tannoury; P Justin Tortolani; Vincent C Traynelis; Ziya Gokaslan; Alan S Hilibrand; Robert E Isaacs; Praveen V Mummaneni; Dean Chou; Sheeraz A Qureshi; Samuel K Cho; Evan O Baird; Rick C Sasso; Paul M Arnold; Zorica Buser; Mohamad Bydon; Michelle J Clarke; Anthony F De Giacomo; Adeeb Derakhshan; Bruce Jobse; Elizabeth L Lord; Daniel Lubelski; Eric M Massicotte; Michael P Steinmetz; Gabriel A Smith; Jonathan Pace; Mark Corriveau; Sungho Lee; Peter I Cha; Dhananjay Chatterjee; Erica L Gee; Erik N Mayer; Owen J McBride; Allison K Roe; Marisa Y Yanez; D Alex Stroh; Khoi D Than; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-04-01

10.  Corticobulbar motor evoked potentials from tongue muscles used as a control in cervical spinal surgery.

Authors:  Dong-Gun Kim; Seong-Rae Jo; Minjung Youn; Seung-Jae Hyun; Ki-Jeong Kim; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Hyun-Jib Kim; Kyung Seok Park
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2017-06-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.