Literature DB >> 19574832

Analysis of complications in patients treated with the X-Stop Interspinous Process Decompression System: proposal for a novel anatomic scoring system for patient selection and review of the literature.

Giuseppe M V Barbagallo1, Giuseppe Olindo, Leonardo Corbino, Vincenzo Albanese.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The X-Stop Interspinous Process Decompression System (St. Francis Medical Technologies, Concord, CA) is an interspinous device used with increasing frequency in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine conditions. To date, limited data are available on complications observed in association with X-Stop procedures, and even less information exists on their underlying causes. The aim of this study was to analyze a series of complications occurring at a single institution and their potential causes and propose an anatomic scoring system that may help to classify patients and prevent complications.
METHODS: Sixty-nine patients were treated with the X-Stop. Forty-six single-level and 23 double-level operations (92 devices) were performed according to recommended indications. The mean follow-up duration was 23 months.
RESULTS: Eight complications were recorded: 4 device dislocations and 4 spinous process (SP) fractures, including 2 spontaneous fractures of the L4 SP in patients treated at L3-L4 and L4-L5. The following anatomic variants were demonstrated: markedly decreased interspinous distance (kissing spine-like), with concomitant facet joint hypertrophy, a posterior V-shaped interspinous area, limited accessibility of the space between the base and the tip of the SP because of facet joint hypertrophy and variations in the shape of the inferior surface of the cranial SP.
CONCLUSION: This is the first study focusing on interspinous distractor complications and the anatomic features of the SP and interspinous areas of the patients, which could potentially be the underlying causes for those complications. The X-Stop can be an effective treatment option, but it is not a panacea for all patients with degenerative lumbar spine conditions. Not only do the clinical indications deserve attention, but also, and most importantly, the patient's anatomic characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19574832     DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000346254.07116.31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  30 in total

Review 1.  Role of lumbar interspinous distraction on the neural elements.

Authors:  Alex Alfieri; Roberto Gazzeri; Julian Prell; Christian Scheller; Jens Rachinger; Christian Strauss; Andreas Schwarz
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  [Longterm results of the interspinous spacer X-STOP].

Authors:  A Reinhardt; S Hufnagel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  [Treatment of dynamic spinal canal stenosis with an interspinous spacer].

Authors:  Christoph J Siepe; Franziska Heider; Rudolf Beisse; H Michael Mayer; Andreas Korge
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.154

4.  Elastic resistance of the spine: Why does motion preservation surgery almost fail?

Authors:  Alessandro Landi
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 1.337

5.  Critical analysis of lumbar interspinous devices failures: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Francesco Ciro Tamburrelli; Luca Proietti; Carlo Ambrogio Logroscino
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Minimally invasive procedures on the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Branko Skovrlj; Jeffrey Gilligan; Holt S Cutler; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 1.337

7.  Morphometry of lumbar spinous process via three dimensional CT reconstruction in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Bo Ran; Qiang Li; Baoqing Yu; Xiangyang Chen; Kaijin Guo
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-01-15

8.  ISASS Recommendations/Coverage Criteria for Decompression with Interlaminar Stabilization - Coverage Indications, Limitations, and/or Medical Necessity.

Authors:  Richard Guyer; Michael Musacchio; Frank P Cammisa; Morgan P Lorio
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-12-05

9.  Let'X-STOP with any "distraction" from the true problem: scenarios in which minimally invasive surgery is not welcome!

Authors:  Tobias A Mattei
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.042

10.  Interspinous spacers compared with decompression or fusion for lumbar stenosis: complications and repeat operations in the Medicare population.

Authors:  Richard A Deyo; Brook I Martin; Alex Ching; Anna N A Tosteson; Jeffrey G Jarvik; William Kreuter; Sohail K Mirza
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.