Literature DB >> 28985858

Increase in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy conversation online unrelated to decision-making.

Rebecca A Marmor1, Wenrui Dai2, Xiaoqian Jiang2, Shuang Wang2, Sarah L Blair3, Jina Huh2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The increased uptake of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) among breast cancer patients remains poorly understood. We hypothesized that the increased rate of CPM is represented in conversations on an online breast cancer community and may contribute to patients choosing this operation.
METHODS: We downloaded 328,763 posts and their dates of creation from an online breast cancer community from August 1, 2000, to May 22, 2016. We then performed a keyword search to identify posts which mentioned breast cancer surgeries: contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (n = 7095), mastectomy (n = 10,889), and lumpectomy (n = 9694). We graphed the percentage of CPM-related, lumpectomy-related, and mastectomy-related conversations over time. We also graphed the frequency of posts which mentioned multiple operations over time. Finally, we performed a qualitative study to identify factors influencing the observed trends.
RESULTS: Surgically related posts (e.g., mentioning at least one operation) made up a small percentage (n = 27,678; 8.4%) of all posts on this community. The percentage of surgically related posts mentioning CPM was found to increase over time, whereas the percentage of surgically related posts mentioning mastectomy decreased over time. Among posts that mentioned more than one operation, mastectomy and lumpectomy were the procedures most commonly mentioned together, followed by mastectomy and CPM. There was no change over time in the frequency of posts that mentioned more than one operation. Our qualitative review found that most posts mentioning a single operation were unrelated to surgical decision-making; rather the operation was mentioned only in the context of the patient's cancer history. Conversely, the most posts mentioning multiple operations centered around the patients' surgical decision-making process.
CONCLUSIONS: CPM-related conversation is increasing on this online breast cancer community, whereas mastectomy-related conversation is decreasing. These results appear to be primarily informed by patients reporting the types of operations they have undergone, and thus appear to correspond to the known increased uptake of CPM.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy; Online health community; Patient decision-making; Qualitative research

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28985858      PMCID: PMC5658786          DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  20 in total

1.  A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: Part 2. The influence of changing mastectomy patterns on reconstructive rate and method.

Authors:  Yeliz Cemal; Claudia R Albornoz; Joseph J Disa; Colleen M McCarthy; Babak J Mehrara; Andrea L Pusic; Peter G Cordeiro; Evan Matros
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Social and Clinical Determinants of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Reshma Jagsi; Monica Morrow; Nancy K Janz; Ann Hamilton; John J Graff; Steven J Katz
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  Trends in contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral cancer: a report from the National Cancer Data Base, 1998-2007.

Authors:  Katharine Yao; Andrew K Stewart; David J Winchester; David P Winchester
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Perceptions, knowledge, and satisfaction with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among young women with breast cancer: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Shoshana M Rosenberg; Michaela S Tracy; Meghan E Meyer; Karen Sepucha; Shari Gelber; Judi Hirshfield-Bartek; Susan Troyan; Monica Morrow; Lidia Schapira; Steven E Come; Eric P Winer; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Factors influencing prognosis in node-negative breast carcinoma: analysis of 767 T1N0M0/T2N0M0 patients with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  P P Rosen; S Groshen; D W Kinne; L Norton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Perceived benefits of online support groups for women with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Ruvanee P Vilhauer
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug

7.  Diagnostic breast magnetic resonance imaging and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.

Authors:  Melony E S Sorbero; Andrew W Dick; Ellen Burke Beckjord; Gretchen Ahrendt
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Decision-Making in Breast Cancer Surgery: Where Do Patients Go for Information?

Authors:  Hank Schmidt; Almog Cohen; John Mandeli; Christina Weltz; Elisa R Port
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  Benefits of peer support in online Japanese breast cancer communities: differences between lurkers and posters.

Authors:  Yoko Setoyama; Yoshihiko Yamazaki; Kazuhiro Namayama
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Use of the Internet by women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Joshua Fogel; Steven M Albert; Freya Schnabel; Beth Ann Ditkoff; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2002 Apr-Nov       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  1 in total

1.  Understanding Stakeholder Preference for Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: A Conjoint Analysis.

Authors:  Meghana G Shamsunder; Hina Panchal; Melissa Pilewskie; Clara Lee; Shantanu N Razdan; Evan Matros
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 6.532

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.