UNLABELLED: Chinese translation BACKGROUND: Rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) have increased dramatically, particularly among younger women with breast cancer, but little is known about how women approach the decision to have CPM. OBJECTIVE: To examine preferences, knowledge, decision making, and experiences of young women with breast cancer who choose CPM. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: 8 academic and community medical centers that enrolled 550 women diagnosed with breast cancer at age 40 years or younger between November 2006 and November 2010. PATIENTS: 123 women without known bilateral breast cancer who reported having bilateral mastectomy. MEASUREMENTS: A 1-time, 23-item survey that included items related to decision making, knowledge, risk perception, and breast cancer worry. RESULTS: Most women indicated that desires to decrease their risk for contralateral breast cancer (98%) and improve survival (94%) were extremely or very important factors in their decision to have CPM. However, only 18% indicated that women with breast cancer who undergo CPM live longer than those who do not. BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers more accurately perceived their risk for contralateral breast cancer, whereas women without a known mutation substantially overestimated this risk. LIMITATIONS: The survey, which was administered a median of 2 years after surgery, was not validated, and some questions might have been misinterpreted by respondents or subject to recall bias. Generalizability of the findings might be limited. CONCLUSION: Despite knowing that CPM does not clearly improve survival, women who have the procedure do so, in part, to extend their lives. Many women overestimate their actual risk for cancer in the unaffected breast. Interventions aimed at improving risk communication in an effort to promote evidence-based decision making are warranted. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Susan G. Komen for the Cure.
UNLABELLED: Chinese translation BACKGROUND: Rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) have increased dramatically, particularly among youngerwomen with breast cancer, but little is known about how women approach the decision to have CPM. OBJECTIVE: To examine preferences, knowledge, decision making, and experiences of young women with breast cancer who choose CPM. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: 8 academic and community medical centers that enrolled 550 women diagnosed with breast cancer at age 40 years or younger between November 2006 and November 2010. PATIENTS: 123 women without known bilateral breast cancer who reported having bilateral mastectomy. MEASUREMENTS: A 1-time, 23-item survey that included items related to decision making, knowledge, risk perception, and breast cancer worry. RESULTS: Most women indicated that desires to decrease their risk for contralateral breast cancer (98%) and improve survival (94%) were extremely or very important factors in their decision to have CPM. However, only 18% indicated that women with breast cancer who undergo CPM live longer than those who do not. BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers more accurately perceived their risk for contralateral breast cancer, whereas women without a known mutation substantially overestimated this risk. LIMITATIONS: The survey, which was administered a median of 2 years after surgery, was not validated, and some questions might have been misinterpreted by respondents or subject to recall bias. Generalizability of the findings might be limited. CONCLUSION: Despite knowing that CPM does not clearly improve survival, women who have the procedure do so, in part, to extend their lives. Many women overestimate their actual risk for cancer in the unaffected breast. Interventions aimed at improving risk communication in an effort to promote evidence-based decision making are warranted. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Susan G. Komen for the Cure.
Authors: Nancy K Janz; Mahasin Mujahid; Paula M Lantz; Angela Fagerlin; Barbara Salem; Monica Morrow; Dennis Deapen; Steven J Katz Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Ann M Geiger; Carmen N West; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Lisa J Herrinton; In-Liu A Liu; Andrea Altschuler; Sharon J Rolnick; Emily L Harris; Sarah M Greene; Joann G Elmore; Karen M Emmons; Suzanne W Fletcher Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-03-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Marlene H Frost; Jeffrey M Slezak; Nho V Tran; Constance I Williams; Joanne L Johnson; John E Woods; Paul M Petty; John H Donohue; Clive S Grant; Jeff A Sloan; Thomas A Sellers; Lynn C Hartmann Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-10-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kristi D Graves; Beth N Peshkin; Chanita H Halbert; Tiffani A DeMarco; Claudine Isaacs; Marc D Schwartz Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2006-10-26 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Larissa Nekhlyudov; Megan Bower; Lisa J Herrinton; Andrea Altschuler; Sarah M Greene; Sharon Rolnick; Joann G Elmore; Emily L Harris; Amy Liu; Karen M Emmons; Suzanne W Fletcher; Ann M Geiger Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr Date: 2005
Authors: Kenneth P Tercyak; Beth N Peshkin; Barbara M Brogan; Tiffani DeMarco; Marie F Pennanen; Shawna C Willey; Colette M Magnant; Sarah Rogers; Claudine Isaacs; Marc D Schwartz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-12-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ann Partridge; Kristie Adloff; Emily Blood; E Claire Dees; Carolyn Kaelin; Mehra Golshan; Jennifer Ligibel; Janet S de Moor; Jane Weeks; Karen Emmons; Eric Winer Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2008-02-12 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Shoshana M Rosenberg; Kathryn J Ruddy; Rulla M Tamimi; Shari Gelber; Lidia Schapira; Steven Come; Virginia F Borges; Bryce Larsen; Judy E Garber; Ann H Partridge Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Shoshana M Rosenberg; Karen Sepucha; Kathryn J Ruddy; Rulla M Tamimi; Shari Gelber; Meghan E Meyer; Lidia Schapira; Steven E Come; Virginia F Borges; Mehra Golshan; Eric P Winer; Ann H Partridge Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2015-05-01 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Jada G Hamilton; Margaux C Genoff; Melissa Salerno; Kimberly Amoroso; Sherry R Boyar; Margaret Sheehan; Megan Harlan Fleischut; Beth Siegel; Angela G Arnold; Erin E Salo-Mullen; Jennifer L Hay; Kenneth Offit; Mark E Robson Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Thomas A D'Agostino; Abenaa M Brewster; Susan K Peterson; Isabelle Bedrosian; Patricia A Parker Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2020-05-20 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Shoshana M Rosenberg; Mary L Greaney; Andrea F Patenaude; Ann H Partridge Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2019-04-03 Impact factor: 2.223
Authors: Sharon L Manne; Barbara L Smith; Sara Frederick; Anna Mitarotondo; Deborah A Kashy; Laurie J Kirstein Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2020-05-20 Impact factor: 3.046