Literature DB >> 29794049

Magnetocarcinogenesis: is there a mechanism for carcinogenic effects of weak magnetic fields?

Jukka Juutilainen1, Mikko Herrala2, Jukka Luukkonen2, Jonne Naarala2, P J Hore3.   

Abstract

Extremely low-frequency (ELF) magnetic fields have been classified as possibly carcinogenic, mainly based on rather consistent epidemiological findings suggesting a link between childhood leukaemia and 50-60 Hz magnetic fields from power lines. However, causality is not the only possible explanation for the epidemiological associations, as animal and in vitro experiments have provided only limited support for carcinogenic effects of ELF magnetic fields. Importantly, there is no generally accepted biophysical mechanism that could explain such effects. In this review, we discuss the possibility that carcinogenic effects are based on the radical pair mechanism (RPM), which seems to be involved in magnetoreception in birds and certain other animals, allowing navigation in the geomagnetic field. We review the current understanding of the RPM in magnetoreception, and discuss cryptochromes as the putative magnetosensitive molecules and their possible links to cancer-relevant biological processes. We then propose a hypothesis for explaining the link between ELF fields and childhood leukaemia, discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the current evidence, and make proposals for further research.
© 2018 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  ELF magnetic fields; cancer; cryptochrome; genomic instability; radical pair mechanism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29794049      PMCID: PMC5998098          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  85 in total

1.  Decreased DNA repair rates and protection from heat induced apoptosis mediated by electromagnetic field exposure.

Authors:  Jacob G Robison; Amanda R Pendleton; Kirk O Monson; Byron K Murray; Kim L O'Neill
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.010

2.  Alterations in the cell cycle and in the protein level of cyclin D1, p21CIP1, and p16INK4a after exposure to 50 Hz MF in human cells.

Authors:  Sandra Lange; Doreen Richard; Torsten Viergutz; Ralf Kriehuber; Dieter G Weiss; Myrtill Simkó
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Magnetically sensitive light-induced reactions in cryptochrome are consistent with its proposed role as a magnetoreceptor.

Authors:  Kiminori Maeda; Alexander J Robinson; Kevin B Henbest; Hannah J Hogben; Till Biskup; Margaret Ahmad; Erik Schleicher; Stefan Weber; Christiane R Timmel; P J Hore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Circadian clocks: neural and peripheral pacemakers that impact upon the cell division cycle.

Authors:  Akhilesh B Reddy; Gabriel K Y Wong; John O'Neill; Elizabeth S Maywood; Michael H Hastings
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Do extremely low frequency magnetic fields enhance the effects of environmental carcinogens? A meta-analysis of experimental studies.

Authors:  Jukka Juutilainen; Timo Kumlin; Jonne Naarala
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.694

6.  Circadian gene expression and extremely low-frequency magnetic fields: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Nicola Manzella; Massimo Bracci; Veronica Ciarapica; Sara Staffolani; Elisabetta Strafella; Venerando Rapisarda; Matteo Valentino; Monica Amati; Alfredo Copertaro; Lory Santarelli
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2015-03-22       Impact factor: 2.010

7.  A physical mechanism of magnetoreception: Extension and analysis.

Authors:  Vladimir N Binhi; Frank S Prato
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.010

8.  Redox rhythmicity: clocks at the core of temporal coherence.

Authors:  David Lloyd; Douglas B Murray
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.345

9.  The rate of X-ray-induced DNA double-strand break repair in the embryonic mouse brain is unaffected by exposure to 50 Hz magnetic fields.

Authors:  Lisa Woodbine; Jackie Haines; Margaret Coster; Lara Barazzuol; Elizabeth Ainsbury; Zenon Sienkiewicz; Penny Jeggo
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 2.694

10.  Millitesla magnetic field effects on the photocycle of an animal cryptochrome.

Authors:  Dean M W Sheppard; Jing Li; Kevin B Henbest; Simon R T Neil; Kiminori Maeda; Jonathan Storey; Erik Schleicher; Till Biskup; Ryan Rodriguez; Stefan Weber; P J Hore; Christiane R Timmel; Stuart R Mackenzie
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  13 in total

1.  Proposal to use superparamagnetic nanoparticles to test the role of cryptochrome in magnetoreception.

Authors:  Susannah Bourne Worster; P J Hore
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Weak radiofrequency fields affect the insect circadian clock.

Authors:  Premysl Bartos; Radek Netusil; Pavel Slaby; David Dolezel; Thorsten Ritz; Martin Vacha
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  How the Geomagnetic Field Influences Life on Earth - An Integrated Approach to Geomagnetobiology.

Authors:  Weronika Erdmann; Hanna Kmita; Jakub Z Kosicki; Łukasz Kaczmarek
Journal:  Orig Life Evol Biosph       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 1.950

4.  Magnetic fields, cancer and circadian rhythms: hypotheses on the relevance of intermittence and cycling.

Authors:  María Florencia Guerra; María Gabriela Lacoste; Ana Cecilia Anzulovich; Leonardo Makinistian
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Ultrafast flavin/tryptophan radical pair kinetics in a magnetically sensitive artificial protein.

Authors:  Chris Bialas; David T Barnard; Dirk B Auman; Rylee A McBride; Lauren E Jarocha; P J Hore; P Leslie Dutton; Robert J Stanley; Christopher C Moser
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 3.676

6.  Cellular autofluorescence is magnetic field sensitive.

Authors:  Noboru Ikeya; Jonathan R Woodward
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 12.779

7.  Investigating the effects of exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on job burnout syndrome and the severity of depression; the role of oxidative stress.

Authors:  Majid Bagheri Hosseinabadi; Narges Khanjani; Mohammad Hossein Ebrahimi; Seyed Habib Mousavi; Fereshteh Nazarkhani
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.708

8.  Upper bound on the biological effects of 50/60 Hz magnetic fields mediated by radical pairs.

Authors:  P J Hore
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Cryptochrome: The magnetosensor with a sinister side?

Authors:  Lukas Landler; David A Keays
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Rotations of macromolecules affect nonspecific biological responses to magnetic fields.

Authors:  Vladimir N Binhi; Frank S Prato
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.