Literature DB >> 27431733

Yield stress determines bioprintability of hydrogels based on gelatin-methacryloyl and gellan gum for cartilage bioprinting.

Vivian H M Mouser1, Ferry P W Melchels, Jetze Visser, Wouter J A Dhert, Debby Gawlitta, Jos Malda.   

Abstract

Bioprinting of chondrocyte-laden hydrogels facilitates the fabrication of constructs with controlled organization and shape e.g. for articular cartilage implants. Gelatin-methacryloyl (gelMA) supplemented with gellan gum is a promising bio-ink. However, the rheological properties governing the printing process, and the influence of gellan gum on the mechanical properties and chondrogenesis of the blend, are still unknown. Here, we investigated the suitability of gelMA/gellan for cartilage bioprinting. Multiple concentrations, ranging from 3% to 20% gelMA with 0%-1.5% gellan gum, were evaluated for their printability, defined as the ability to form filaments and to incorporate cells at 15 °C-37 °C. To support the printability assessment, yield stress and viscosity of the hydrogels were measured. Stiffness of UV-cured constructs, as well as cartilage-like tissue formation by embedded chondrocytes, were determined in vitro. A large range of gelMA/gellan concentrations were printable with inclusion of cells and formed the bioprinting window. The addition of gellan gum improved filament deposition by inducing yielding behavior, increased construct stiffness and supported chondrogenesis. High gellan gum concentrations, however, did compromise cartilage matrix production and distribution, and even higher concentrations resulted in too high yield stresses to allow cell encapsulation. This study demonstrates the high potential of gelMA/gellan blends for cartilage bioprinting and identifies yield stress as a dominant factor for bioprintability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27431733      PMCID: PMC4954607          DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofabrication        ISSN: 1758-5082            Impact factor:   9.954


  54 in total

Review 1.  Strategies and Molecular Design Criteria for 3D Printable Hydrogels.

Authors:  Tomasz Jungst; Willi Smolan; Kristin Schacht; Thomas Scheibel; Jürgen Groll
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Three-dimensional bioassembly tool for generating viable tissue-engineered constructs.

Authors:  Cynthia M Smith; Alice L Stone; Robert L Parkhill; Robert L Stewart; Mark W Simpkins; Anatoly M Kachurin; William L Warren; Stuart K Williams
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct

Review 3.  Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate.

Authors:  Dennis E Discher; Paul Janmey; Yu-Li Wang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Reinforcement of hydrogels using three-dimensionally printed microfibres.

Authors:  Jetze Visser; Ferry P W Melchels; June E Jeon; Erik M van Bussel; Laura S Kimpton; Helen M Byrne; Wouter J A Dhert; Paul D Dalton; Dietmar W Hutmacher; Jos Malda
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  3D bioprinting of tissues and organs.

Authors:  Sean V Murphy; Anthony Atala
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Photocrosslinkable hyaluronan-gelatin hydrogels for two-step bioprinting.

Authors:  Aleksander Skardal; Jianxing Zhang; Lindsi McCoard; Xiaoyu Xu; Siam Oottamasathien; Glenn D Prestwich
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  Chemical basis for the histological use of safranin O in the study of articular cartilage.

Authors:  L Rosenberg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Hydrogel properties influence ECM production by chondrocytes photoencapsulated in poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels.

Authors:  Stephanie J Bryant; Kristi S Anseth
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2002-01

9.  Comparative study of the intrinsic mechanical properties of the human acetabular and femoral head cartilage.

Authors:  K A Athanasiou; A Agarwal; F J Dzida
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Gellan gum: a new biomaterial for cartilage tissue engineering applications.

Authors:  J T Oliveira; L Martins; R Picciochi; P B Malafaya; R A Sousa; N M Neves; J F Mano; R L Reis
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 4.396

View more
  47 in total

Review 1.  Cell-laden hydrogels for osteochondral and cartilage tissue engineering.

Authors:  Jingzhou Yang; Yu Shrike Zhang; Kan Yue; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 8.947

2.  Dual crosslinking strategy to generate mechanically viable cell-laden printable constructs using methacrylated collagen bioinks.

Authors:  Nilabh S Kajave; Trevor Schmitt; Thuy-Uyen Nguyen; Vipuil Kishore
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 7.328

3.  Photochemically crosslinked cell-laden methacrylated collagen hydrogels with high cell viability and functionality.

Authors:  Thuy-Uyen Nguyen; Kori E Watkins; Vipuil Kishore
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2019-04-07       Impact factor: 4.396

4.  The bio in the ink: cartilage regeneration with bioprintable hydrogels and articular cartilage-derived progenitor cells.

Authors:  Riccardo Levato; William R Webb; Iris A Otto; Anneloes Mensinga; Yadan Zhang; Mattie van Rijen; René van Weeren; Ilyas M Khan; Jos Malda
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 8.947

5.  Flow Behavior Prior to Crosslinking: The Need for Precursor Rheology for Placement of Hydrogels in Medical Applications and for 3D Bioprinting.

Authors:  Jakob M Townsend; Emily C Beck; Stevin H Gehrke; Cory J Berkland; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  Prog Polym Sci       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 29.190

Review 6.  3D Bioprinting: from Benches to Translational Applications.

Authors:  Marcel Alexander Heinrich; Wanjun Liu; Andrea Jimenez; Jingzhou Yang; Ali Akpek; Xiao Liu; Qingmeng Pi; Xuan Mu; Ning Hu; Raymond Michel Schiffelers; Jai Prakash; Jingwei Xie; Yu Shrike Zhang
Journal:  Small       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 13.281

7.  The Influence of Printing Parameters and Cell Density on Bioink Printing Outcomes.

Authors:  Gregory J Gillispie; Albert Han; Meryem Uzun-Per; John Fisher; Antonios G Mikos; Muhammad Khalid Khan Niazi; James J Yoo; Sang Jin Lee; Anthony Atala
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 3.845

8.  Bioprintable Alginate/Gelatin Hydrogel 3D In Vitro Model Systems Induce Cell Spheroid Formation.

Authors:  Tao Jiang; Jose Munguia-Lopez; Salvador Flores-Torres; Joel Grant; Sanahan Vijayakumar; Antonio De Leon-Rodriguez; Joseph M Kinsella
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Assessing bioink shape fidelity to aid material development in 3D bioprinting.

Authors:  A Ribeiro; M M Blokzijl; R Levato; C W Visser; M Castilho; W E Hennink; T Vermonden; J Malda
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 9.954

Review 10.  Physical and Chemical Factors Influencing the Printability of Hydrogel-based Extrusion Bioinks.

Authors:  Sang Cheon Lee; Gregory Gillispie; Peter Prim; Sang Jin Lee
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 60.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.