Literature DB >> 28974776

Associations between SNPs and immune-related circulating proteins in schizophrenia.

Man K Chan1, Jason D Cooper1, Stefanie Heilmann-Heimbach2,3, Josef Frank4, Stephanie H Witt4, Markus M Nöthen2,3, Johann Steiner5, Marcella Rietschel6, Sabine Bahn7.   

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and proteomic studies have provided convincing evidence implicating alterations in immune/inflammatory processes in schizophrenia. However, despite the convergence of evidence, direct links between the genetic and proteomic findings are still lacking for schizophrenia. We investigated associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from the custom-made PsychArray and the expression levels of 190 multiplex immunoassay profiled serum proteins in 149 schizophrenia patients and 198 matched controls. We identified associations between 81 SNPs and 29 proteins, primarily involved in immune/inflammation responses. Significant SNPxDiagnosis interactions were identified for eight serum proteins including Factor-VII[rs555212], Alpha-1-Antitrypsin[rs11846959], Interferon-Gamma Induced Protein 10[rs4256246] and von-Willebrand-Factor[rs12829220] in the control group; Chromogranin-A[rs9658644], Cystatin-C[rs2424577] and Vitamin K-Dependent Protein S[rs6123] in the schizophrenia group; Interleukin-6 receptor[rs7553796] in both the control and schizophrenia groups. These results suggested that the effect of these SNPs on expression of the respective proteins varies with diagnosis. The combination of patient-specific genetic information with blood biomarker data opens a novel approach to investigate disease mechanisms in schizophrenia and other psychiatric disorders. Our findings not only suggest that blood protein expression is influenced by polymorphisms in the corresponding gene, but also that the effect of certain SNPs on expression of proteins can vary with diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28974776      PMCID: PMC5626704          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-12986-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

Schizophrenia is a heritable and heterogeneous disorder likely to be affected by environmental factors. The combined evidence from genetic, epidemiological, transcriptomic and proteomic studies has now converged at alterations in metabolic, neurotrophic and prominently, immune/inflammatory processes in schizophrenia. The largest genome-wide association study (GWAS) conducted has identified 108 schizophrenia associated genetic loci involved in glutamatergic neurotransmission and synaptic plasticity and, importantly in immune processes[1]. Epidemiological and transcriptomic studies have long hinted at a role for immune dysregulation in schizophrenia[2-5]. Blood-based protein biomarker studies have also demonstrated changes in immune/inflammatory processes in prodromal and drug-naïve patients, from which candidate diagnostic and prognostic biomarker panels have been reported[6]. In addition, clinical trials have shown initial encouraging therapeutic effects associated with add-on anti-inflammatory medication in schizophrenia patients[7]. Despite the convergence of evidence, direct links between the genetic and proteomic findings have as yet not been established for schizophrenia. While genetics may provide insights into the biological mechanisms underpinning disease susceptibility, proteomics can provide functional molecular evidence linked to disease manifestation. Although GWAS studies have ‘implicated’ a number of candidate genes, these studies have shown that most of the associations are to genomic regions (‘loci’). For most of these loci, it is not certain which exact gene is affected[8]. In addition, because almost all the schizophrenia-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been found to be located within non-coding regions of genes, elucidation and interpretation of the biological basis for the genetic associations remains challenging[8]. With this in mind, we attempted for the first time to investigate associations between 190 serum proteins implicated in several psychiatric disorders[9-12] including schizophrenia[6,13-16] and SNPs located within genes encoding for the measured proteins in 149 schizophrenia patients and 198 matched controls. The SNPs will be analysed by the custom-made PsychArray, which was developed by Illumina in collaboration with the Psychiatric Genomic Consortium (PGC). It assesses approximately 270,000 tag SNPs, over 250,000 rare and low-frequency exonic variants and approximately 50,000 custom markers selected based on evidence from prior genetic studies of psychiatric illnesses including schizophrenia, major depressive, bipolar and autism-spectrum disorders[17].

Materials and Methods

Clinical samples

A total of 347 individuals were recruited consecutively from the department of Psychiatry, University of Magdeburg, Germany including 198 controls and 149 schizophrenia patients (109 first-onset antipsychotic drug-naïve and 40 antipsychotic drug treated). Diagnosis of schizophrenia was performed by psychiatrists using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV)[18]. Information on antipsychotic medication use was confirmed by direct contact with the treating family physicians and relatives along with consultations regarding detailed histories of psychotropic medication use prior to hospitalization. Controls were matched with the patient group for age, gender and body mass index (BMI) (Table 1) and were recruited from a database of blood donors at the Institute of Transfusion Medicine at the University of Magdeburg and, some were students and staff at the University. Exclusion criteria included chronic illnesses such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, immune and autoimmune disorders, infections, treatment with immune- suppressive or -modulating drugs or antibiotics, other neuropsychiatric or neurological disorders (multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, mental retardation), chronic (terminal) diseases affecting the brain (cancer, hepatic and renal insufficiency), alcohol or drug addiction, organic psychosis/organic affective syndromes, severe trauma, other psychiatric and non-psychiatric co-morbidity. Medication was administered after completion of diagnostic evaluation as appropriate. Informed written consent was given by all participants and the study protocols, analysis of samples and test methods were approved by the local Institutional Ethics Review Board and were in compliance with the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy[19].
Table 1

Demographic characteristics.

Controls (198) Schizophrenia P-value
All (149) First onset (109) Chronic (40)
Age W 36|35 (11) [18–65]37|36 (11) [16–66]36|34 (11) [16–66]39|41 (9) [22–53]0.5025
BMI (kg/m 2 ) W 26|25 (4) [18–41]26|26 (5) [17–41]25|24 (5) [17–37]29|28 (5) [21–41]0.3940
Gender F
Female94 (47%)64 (43%)40 (37%)22 (55%)0.3286
Male104 (53%)85 (57%)69 (63%)18 (45%)
Previous antipsychotic medication
YesNA40 (27%)0 (0%)40 (100%)NA
NoNA109 (73%)109 (100%)0 (0%)

Numerical values are shown as Mean|Median (Standard Deviation) [Min-Max].

Key: F, Fisher’s exact test; W, Wilcoxon test; P-values are calculated using the control group as the reference (i.e. difference between the patient and control group).

Demographic characteristics. Numerical values are shown as Mean|Median (Standard Deviation) [Min-Max]. Key: F, Fisher’s exact test; W, Wilcoxon test; P-values are calculated using the control group as the reference (i.e. difference between the patient and control group).

Serum sample preparation

Serum sample collection and preparation followed strict standard operating protocols, as described previously[13]. Briefly, blood samples were collected from all subjects between 8:00 and 12:00 hours in the morning into S-Monovette 7.5 mL serum tubes (Sarstedt; Numbrecht, Germany). The samples were left to clot at room temperature for 2 hours and then centrifuged at 4000 × g for 5 minutes. The resulting supernatants were stored at −80 °C in Low Binding Eppendorf tubes (Hamburg, Germany).

Multiplex immunoassay analysis and Quality Control

The Multi-Analyte Profiling immunoassay platform (DiscoveryMAP) was used to measure the concentrations of 190 proteins in patient sera. The proteins measured were mainly involved in immune/inflammatory, endocrine and metabolic processes previously implicated in several neurological/psychiatric disorders[9-12] including schizophrenia[6,13-16], depression[20,21] and bipolar disorder[22]. All assays were conducted in the Clinical Laboratory Improved Amendments (CLIA)–certified laboratory at Myriad-RBM (Austin, TX, USA; described previously[13]). All serum samples were stored at −80 °C until analysis. Data were quality control (QC) assessed and pre-processed using R (http://www.R-project.org/)[23], as described previously[6]. Briefly, proteins with greater than 30% missing values were excluded and values below or above the detection limits were imputed by the minimum and maximum detected values, respectively. Data were log2-transformed to stabilise variance. Sample outliers were examined using principal components analysis (PCA)[24] and through inspection of quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plots.

Genotyping and Quality Control

Blood DNA samples from all participants were genotyped using the Illumina Infinium PsychArray v1.0 (Illuminia Inc, San Diego, California, USA) at the Department of Genomics at the Life and Brain Centre, University of Bonn. Data was quality control (QC) assessed using PLINK v1.07[25] and R (http://www.R-project.org/)[23], as described previously[26]. Per-individual QC involved exclusion of samples with (1) over 3% missing genotypes (no samples); (2) abnormal heterozygosity rate ±3 standard deviations from the mean (7 samples); (3) related or duplicated samples (7 samples) identified through identity by -state and -descend sharing analysis on an linkage disequilibrium-pruned set of SNPs (for each pair related or duplicated individuals, the individual with lower genotyping completeness was excluded); and, (4) individuals of non-European ancestry (2 samples) identified by combining study genotypes with genotypes from HapMap3 data with the following population codes: CEU (Utah residents with Northern and Western European ancestry), YRI (Yoruba in Ibadan, Nigeria), CHB (Han Chinese in Beijing, China), JPT (Japanese in Tokyo, Japan). Per-SNP QC involved exclusion of SNPs (1) with over 5% missing genotype (2348); (2) showing excessive deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P < 10−3) in the control group (800); (3) significantly different missing genotype rates between cases and controls (P < 10−5) (0); and, (4) with a very low minor allele frequency (MAF) of less than 1% (278912).

SNP selection

The genotype data were subjected to gene annotation using the biomaRt package[27] in R to identify the SNPs located within genes encoding for the measured proteins. These SNPs were selected for downstream linear regression analysis.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed in R (http://www.R-project.org/)[23]. Linear regression analyses were carried out to identify association between SNPs and the corresponding proteins. For each regression model, each SNP was individually included as the predictor variable (continuous variable coded 0, 1, 2 counting the number of major alleles) along with covariates, diagnosis (binary case/control status) and a SNP x Diagnosis interaction term to identify case/control specific SNP and protein associations. Protein concentration was modelled as the continuous outcome variable. The covariates were age, gender, BMI and antipsychotic medication. Regression diagnostics were examined to ensure that all the model assumptions were met including check for residual normality, data linearity, independence and homoscedasticity and, exclusion of high leverage points, outliers and influential values. False discovery rate was controlled according to Benjamini and Hochberg[28]. To account for regression model stability and robustness of findings, bootstrap resampling was repeated 1000 times for each test[29]. Given the exploratory nature of the study, SNP-protein associations were accepted as significant if adjusted P-values < 0.05 or if P-values < 0.05 in over 70% of 1000 bootstrap samples. SNPxDiagnosis results were strictly only accepted as significant following multiple correction at adjusted P-value < 0.05.

Results

The demographic characteristics of the study cohort are summarised in Table 1. The patient and control groups were matched for age, gender and BMI. The mean age and BMI of patients was 36 and 26, respectively and for controls 37 and 26, respectively. The percentage of males/females was 57%/43% for patients and 53%/47% for controls.

SNP and protein expression association

In total, 149 of the 190 proteins measured by the multiplex immunoassay platform survived QC. Following genetic data QC, 308,263 of the original 588,454 SNPs were left for analysis and sample size was reduced to 331 (189 controls and 142 schizophrenia patients). Of these, we found that 632 SNPs were located within 128 genes that encode for 132 of the measured proteins (for minor allele frequencies of SNPs, see Supplementary Table 1). This represented 89% SNP coverage for the 149 proteins surviving QC. Linear regression analysis showed that 115 SNPs were associated with 45 proteins (P-value < 0.05) (Table 2 and Fig. 1). Of these, associations between 81 SNPs and 29 proteins survived multiple testing (adjusted P-value < 0.05) and/or bootstrap resampling. These 29 proteins were involved in several biological functions including [Complement Factor H, Interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6r), Epithelial-Derived Neutrophil-Activating Protein 78 (ENA-78), Fetuin-A, Interleukin-16 (IL-16), Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF), CD5L, Receptor for advanced glycosylation end products (RAGE), Interleukin-18 (IL-18), Chemokine CC-4 (HCC-4), Bone Morphogenetic Protein 6 (BMP-6), Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha (TNF-alpha), Interferon gamma Induced Protein 10 (IP-10), Myeloid Progenitor Inhibitory Factor 1 (MPIF-1)], [Factor VII, Serotransferrin, Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1)], [Apolipoprotein E (Apo-E), Apolipoprotein(a) (Lpa)], [Tamm-Horsfall Urinary Glycoprotein (THP), Matrix Metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3), Glutathione S-Transferase alpha (GST-alpha)], [Adiponectin, Thyroxine-Binding Globulin (TBG), Tenascin-C (TN-C)], [Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE), Angiotensinogen] and, [Cystatin-C, Sortilin]. All directions of association between the SNPs and their corresponding proteins were consistent, except for associations with six proteins including CFH, Lpa, IL-6r, IL-16, Apo-E and MMP-3. This finding suggests that these SNPs may have differential regulatory effects on protein expression.
Table 2

Association of 115 SNPs with expression of 45 proteins.

ProteinProtein AbbrevGeneSNPChrβP-valueAdjusted P-valueBootstrap Sig. (%)
AdiponectinAdiponectinADIPOQexm-rs173665683 0.32 1.99E-03 1.98E-02 87
Alpha-1-AntitrypsinAATSERPINA1rs664714 0.10 2.95E-021.79E-0151
Angiotensin-Converting EnzymeACEACEexm-rs434317 0.41 4.44E-19 3.53E-17 100
rs432917 0.40 4.93E-18 2.61E-16 100
rs433117 0.40 2.56E-18 1.48E-16 100
rs436217 0.40 5.90E-19 4.17E-17 100
AngiotensinogenAngiotensinogenAGTrs24785451 −1.76 3.19E-14 1.01E-12 100
rs66873601 −1.37 6.39E-10 1.23E-08 100
rs6991 −1.25 3.76E-09 6.65E-08 100
Apolipoprotein A-IVApo-A-IVAPOA4rs284917611 0.16 2.55E-021.65E-0159
Apolipoprotein C-IApo-C-IAPOC1snv-rs14162290019 −0.19 2.16E-021.44E-0158
Apolipoprotein EApo-EAPOEexm-rs76944919 0.30 1.10E-03 1.18E-02 81
rs76944919 0.30 1.10E-03 1.18E-02 81
rs72654473190.34 1.10E-03 1.18E-02 89
rs7412190.49 5.66E-06 8.18E-05 99
Apolipoprotein HApo-HAPOHrs9892748170.10 2.87E-021.79E-0157
Apolipoprotein(a)LpaLPAexm-rs777062860.76 1.46E-04 1.82E-03 95
rs7359681662.13 4.88E-06 7.22E-05 100
rs1045587263.02 4.43E-13 1.34E-11 100
rs69264586 0.91 3.19E-05 4.32E-04 98
rs77613776 0.55 6.25E-035.30E-02 72
rs93468336 0.40 4.28E-022.31E-0157
rs93651716 0.55 6.97E-035.84E-02 71
B Lymphocyte ChemoattractantBLCCXCL13rs15962314 0.39 4.40E-022.35E-0154
Bone Morphogenetic Protein 6BMP-6BMP6rs11074956−0.333.32E-021.98E-0163
rs2671876−0.263.35E-021.98E-0164
rs2703786 0.28 2.92E-021.79E-0162
rs2703986 0.39 7.53E-035.99E-02 82
rs9117516 0.31 7.24E-035.90E-02 84
Carcinoembryonic AntigenCEACEACAM5rs1040799919 0.32 2.59E-021.67E-0162
rs9304597190.34 2.00E-021.39E-0166
CD40 LigandCD40 LCD4LGrs1126535230.25 3.64E-022.08E-0153
CD5LCD5LCD5Lrs276550110.16 1.53E-04 1.87E-03 94
Chemokine CC-4HCC 4CCL16rs206397917 0.24 2.92E-03 2.81E-02 75
Complement Factor HCFHCFHexm-rs38039010.36 1.60E-12 4.44E-11 100
rs39554410.36 1.50E-12 4.33E-11 100
exm-rs132942410.35 1.91E-11 4.34E-10 100
rs1075419910.35 1.91E-11 4.34E-10 100
rs1080155510.35 1.91E-11 4.34E-10 100
rs57251510.35 1.91E-11 4.34E-10 100
rs106548910.24 4.86E-03 4.23E-02 86
exm-rs13294281 0.49 2.26E-23 2.99E-21 100
rs75400321 0.49 2.26E-23 2.99E-21 100
exm-rs107376801 0.49 3.29E-23 2.99E-21 100
exm-rs14109961 0.49 3.16E-23 2.99E-21 100
rs14109961 0.49 3.16E-23 2.99E-21 100
exm-rs66776041 0.76 4.65E-66 1.48E-63 100
rs66776041 0.76 4.65E-66 1.48E-63 100
Cystatin-CCystatin CCST3exm-rs91111920 0.08 7.94E-036.23E-02 73
rs382714320 0.09 4.46E-03 3.94E-02 80
Epidermal Growth FactorEGFEGFrs223705140.18 8.40E-04 9.54E-03 95
rs444490340.21 6.00E-05 7.94E-04 99
rs469875640.22 1.20E-04 1.53E-03 99
rs999275540.20 4.03E-04 4.84E-03 97
Epidermal Growth Factor ReceptorEGFREGFRrs1324492570.06 2.18E-021.44E-0167
Epithelial-Derived Neutrophil-Activating Protein 78ENA 78CXCL5rs37754884 0.17 1.76E-021.24E-0161
rs247264940.64 3.57E-12 9.46E-11 100
Factor VIIFactor VIIF7rs56124113 0.37 1.18E-05 1.66E-04 97
rs604113 0.37 2.12E-05 2.94E-04 99
FerritinFRTNFTH1rs760306110.34 2.80E-021.76E-0156
Fetuin-AFetuin AAHSGrs130731063 0.21 2.84E-10 5.65E-09 100
rs20706333 0.21 1.45E-10 3.17E-09 100
rs67886353 0.22 2.03E-10 4.29E-09 100
Glutathione S-Transferase alphaGST alphaGSTA1rs47153326 0.47 3.49E-03 3.17E-02 84
Insulin-like Growth Factor-Binding Protein 2IGFBP 2IGFBP2rs934110520.16 3.74E-022.11E-0152
Interferon gamma Induced Protein 10IP-10CXCL1rs125043394 0.19 1.32E-029.45E-02 76
Interleukin-12 Subunit p40IL-12p40IL12Bexm-rs321309450.20 4.22E-022.29E-0148
rs321222050.20 4.22E-022.29E-0148
Interleukin-16IL-16IL16rs11719628915 0.30 4.88E-022.54E-0148
rs1107300115 0.16 5.76E-03 4.95E-02 73
rs1185771315 0.51 2.32E-10 4.76E-09 100
rs1995830150.17 3.38E-03 3.16E-02 81
Interleukin-18IL-18IL18exm-rs183448111 0.17 1.30E-03 1.36E-02 91
rs544354110.15 4.62E-022.45E-0153
rs574425611 0.17 1.30E-03 1.36E-02 91
Interleukin-6 receptorIL-6rIL6Rexm-rs412926710.44 1.36E-18 8.68E-17 100
exm-rs453754510.42 1.41E-17 6.41E-16 100
rs453754510.42 1.06E-17 5.21E-16 100
rs42408721 0.30 1.46E-07 2.27E-06 100
exm-rs48456251 0.31 1.07E-09 1.99E-08 100
rs22292381 0.32 9.63E-08 1.53E-06 100
rs75144521 0.32 6.69E-08 1.09E-06 100
Kidney Injury Molecule-1KIM 1HAVCR1rs22798045 0.17 4.22E-022.29E-0152
Macrophage Migration Inhibitory FactorMIFMIFrs875643220.22 1.92E-021.34E-0158
Matrix Metalloproteinase-1MMP-1MMP1rs2071230110.44 2.54E-03 2.49E-02 88
rs240849011 0.27 3.66E-022.08E-0152
Matrix Metalloproteinase-3MMP-3MMP3rs522616110.21 3.03E-03 2.88E-02 88
rs566125110.31 5.39E-04 6.35E-03 90
rs67962011 0.33 2.70E-08 4.51E-07 100
Myeloid Progenitor Inhibitory Factor 1MPIF 1CCL23rs171920017 0.23 1.11E-028.14E-0265
rs86055917 0.15 1.05E-027.93E-02 71
Prostatic Acid PhosphatasePAPACPPrs385314830.12 2.68E-021.70E-0161
rs987388130.14 2.53E-021.65E-0158
Pulmonary and Activation-Regulated ChemokinePARCCCL18rs85447717 0.14 2.08E-021.40E-0161
Receptor for advanced glycosylation end productsRAGEAGERexm-rs20220596 0.76 6.12E-04 7.08E-03 87
exm-rs2049936 0.19 3.23E-021.94E-0160
exm-rs226942360.15 4.86E-022.54E-0150
SerotransferrinTransferrinTFexm-rs381164730.10 1.40E-03 1.44E-02 91
rs676271930.09 3.45E-03 3.17E-02 85
SortilinSortilinSORT1rs108580921 0.13 8.59E-036.66E-02 73
rs111029721 0.12 2.06E-021.40E-0165
Tamm-Horsfall Urinary GlycoproteinTHPUMODexm-rs1291770716 0.62 1.59E-15 6.31E-14 100
exm-rs1333322616 0.58 1.59E-14 5.33E-13 100
exm-rs429339316 0.60 3.40E-15 1.20E-13 100
rs1164772716 0.54 1.24E-15 5.28E-14 100
rs429339316 0.60 2.19E-15 8.18E-14 100
rs964625616 0.37 2.81E-09 5.10E-08 100
rs9652589160.14 2.94E-021.79E-0157
Tenascin-CTN CTNCrs101227709 0.34 7.45E-035.99E-0268
rs207152090.17 3.62E-03 3.24E-02 83
rs78472719 0.21 3.61E-022.08E-0153
rs95328890.14 1.08E-028.06E-02 75
Thrombospondin-1Thrombospondin 1THBS1rs2169830150.17 4.05E-022.26E-0148
Thyroxine-Binding GlobulinTBGSERPINA7rs180449523 0.18 1.99E-03 1.98E-02 84
Tumor Necrosis Factor alphaTNF-alphaTNFexm-rs18006296 0.30 9.70E-037.44E-02 79

Chr, chromosome; β, regression coefficient estimates; Italic, negative association; Bold, positive association; Underline, Adjusted P-values < 0.05 or SNP-protein association significant (P-value < 0.05) in at least 70% of 1000 bootstrap samples.

Figure 1

Polar histogram showing the significant SNP-protein associations. Key: A positive direction of association (β) indicates that a higher major allele copy number is associated with a higher protein level in blood. A negative direction of association (−β) indicates that a higher major allele copy number is associated with a lower protein level in blood.

Association of 115 SNPs with expression of 45 proteins. Chr, chromosome; β, regression coefficient estimates; Italic, negative association; Bold, positive association; Underline, Adjusted P-values < 0.05 or SNP-protein association significant (P-value < 0.05) in at least 70% of 1000 bootstrap samples. Polar histogram showing the significant SNP-protein associations. Key: A positive direction of association (β) indicates that a higher major allele copy number is associated with a higher protein level in blood. A negative direction of association (−β) indicates that a higher major allele copy number is associated with a lower protein level in blood.

SNP x Diagnosis interaction effect on protein expression

A total of 21 SNPs showed significant SNP x Diagnosis interactions for 19 proteins suggesting that the effect of these SNPs on expression of the respective proteins varies with diagnosis (Table 3). Separate analysis stratified by diagnosis showed that seven SNPs were associated with seven proteins in the control group, another seven SNPs showed associations with seven proteins in the schizophrenia group and two SNPs were associated with two proteins in both the control and schizophrenia groups (for the complete list of significant SNP and protein associations stratified by diagnosis, see Supplementary Table 2). Approximately half of these SNP-protein associations survived multiple testing including rs555212 (Factor VII) (β = −0.3, adj.P = 3.07E-05]), rs11846959 (Alpha-1-Antitrypsin; AAT) (β = −0.19, adj.P = 0.004), rs4256246 (IP-10) (β = 0.23, adj.P = 0.038) and rs12829220 (von Willebrand Factor; vWF) (β = 0.75, adj.P = 0.006) in the control group; rs9658644 (Chromogranin-A; CgA) (β = 0.77, adj.P = 0.008), rs2424577 (Cystatin-C) (β = 0.09, adj.P = 0.009) and rs6123 (Vitamin K-Dependent Protein S; VKDPS) (β = 0.09, adj.P = 0.034) in the schizophrenia group; rs7553796 (IL-6r) in both the control (β = 0.28, adj.P = 9.44E-07) and schizophrenia (β = 0.43, adj.P = 3.33E-10) groups (Table 3, Fig. 2, Supplementary Figure 1). Figure 2 shows that while an increasing number of major alleles of rs7553796 is associated with increasing levels of the IL-6r protein in blood in both groups, schizophrenia patients with two copies of the major allele (homozygous for the major allele) have significantly higher levels of the IL-6r protein compared to controls homozygous for the major allele. A positive β indicates that a higher number of major alleles is associated with higher protein expression in blood. A negative β indicates that a higher number of major alleles is associated with a lower protein level in blood.
Table 3

Significant SNP x Diagnosis interaction and results stratified by diagnosis.

ProteinProtein AbbrevGeneSNPChrInteraction P-valueControlsSchizophrenia
βP-valueAdjusted P-valueβP-valueAdjusted P-value
Interleukin-6 receptorIL-6rIL6Rrs75537961 3.88E-02 0.28 5.64E-08 9.44E-07 0.43 5.23E-12 3.33E-10
Chromogranin-ACgACHGArs229539614 2.40E-03 0.53 0.016 0.105−0.540.0270.210
Factor VIIFactor VIIF7rs55521213 1.52E-02 0.30 2.03E-06 3.07E-05 −0.040.5210.831
Alpha-1-AntitrypsinAATSERPINA1rs1184695914 3.72E-04 0.19 3.29E-04 0.004 0.080.0520.322
Interferon gamma Induced Protein 10IP-10CXCL1rs42562464 9.85E-03 0.23 0.004 0.038 −0.210.0960.441
von Willebrand FactorvWFVWFrs1282922012 1.01E-02 0.75 0.006 0.047 −0.230.3830.745
Tenascin-CTN CTNCrs70433089 1.69E-02 0.19 0.011 0.079−0.090.3120.689
E-SelectinE SelectinSELErs39174191 7.99E-03 0.11 0.032 0.1770.130.1370.533
LeptinLeptinLEPrs289540997 5.27E-03 0.60 0.041 0.2050.750.0800.398
Chromogranin-ACgACHGArs965864414 2.45E-03 −0.130.5290.790 0.77 0.001 0.008
Cystatin-CCystatin CCST3rs242457720 3.32E-02 0.020.4630.750 0.09 0.001 0.009
Vitamin K-Dependent Protein SVKDPSPROS1rs61233 2.30E-02 −0.010.8090.932 0.09 0.003 0.034
Chromogranin-ACgACHGArs75067814 1.39E-02 −0.130.4890.756 0.57 0.011 0.104
Interleukin-12 Subunit p40IL-12p40IL12Brs25692545 1.23E-02 0.120.2650.5690.29 0.014 0.127
B Lymphocyte ChemoattractantBLCCXCL13rs1425457984 2.86E-02 −0.320.5630.815 1.60 0.016 0.135
CD5LCD5LCD5Lrs168392991 4.73E-02 0.070.4350.7420.35 0.039 0.264
Matrix Metalloproteinase-9MMP-9MMP9rs1392520 1.35E-02 −0.080.3630.6840.180.0530.328
ResistinResistinRETNrs8003591719 2.92E-02 −0.120.1930.4940.110.2610.656
Epidermal Growth Factor ReceptorEGFREGFRrs20724547 3.53E-02 −0.030.1830.4870.030.3480.718
Stem Cell FactorSCFKITLGexm-rs99503012 4.49E-02 −0.120.0720.2940.070.3710.737
ProlactinPRLPRLrs786972346 3.26E-02 −0.660.1180.3870.200.7270.911

Table showing the significant SNP and protein expression associations stratified by diagnosis for the regression models where SNP x Diagnosis interaction was significant. A significant SNP x Diagnosis interaction indicates that effect of SNPs on protein expression varies with diagnosis (binary case/control status).

Key: Interaction P-value, SNP x Diagnosis interaction significance.

Figure 2

Interaction plots showing significant SNP and protein expression associations where SNP x Diagnosis interaction was significant.

Significant SNP x Diagnosis interaction and results stratified by diagnosis. Table showing the significant SNP and protein expression associations stratified by diagnosis for the regression models where SNP x Diagnosis interaction was significant. A significant SNP x Diagnosis interaction indicates that effect of SNPs on protein expression varies with diagnosis (binary case/control status). Key: Interaction P-value, SNP x Diagnosis interaction significance. Interaction plots showing significant SNP and protein expression associations where SNP x Diagnosis interaction was significant.

Discussion

We investigated the association between SNPs genotyped using the PsychArray and the expression levels of 190 serum proteins in 149 schizophrenia patients and 198 matched controls. The hypothesis was that protein expression levels for a given individual are associated with SNPs in the corresponding gene. We found that 632 SNPs were located within 128 genes that encode for 132 of the measured serum proteins. Linear regression analysis identified associations between 81 SNPs and 29 proteins that survived corrections for multiple testing and/or bootstrap resampling. Interestingly, more than half of these proteins could be associated with immune and inflammation responses. The remaining proteins were found to be related to a number of pathways ranging from blood coagulation, metabolism, endocrine signalling to vascular regulation. As a next step, we investigated the SNP x diagnosis interaction. When the effect of a SNP on protein-level differs between patients and controls (e.g., present in one group and absent in the other), this indicates a difference in the biological regulation of the protein level in patients compared to controls. Furthermore, insights can be obtained into whether the involvement of a protein-biomarker in disease development involves disease-specific pathways (Supplementary Figure 2). We found eight serum proteins with a significant interaction which survived multiple testing following analysis stratified by diagnosis, namely rs555212 (Factor VII), rs11846959 (AAT), rs4256246 (IP-10) and rs12829220 (vWF) in the control group; rs9658644 (CgA), rs2424577 (CST3) and rs6123 (VKDPS) in the schizophrenia group; rs7553796 (IL-6r) in both the control and schizophrenia groups. Four out of these eight proteins (AAT, IP10, vWF and IL6r) were involved in immune function/inflammatory processes. This observation aligns with the finding that schizophrenia associations are enriched at enhancers that are active in tissues linked to immune function[1]. Importantly, all of the implicated proteins have previously been repeatedly reported to be differentially expressed in serum or plasma of schizophrenia patients[6,13-16]. Some of these proteins such as Factor VII, vWF, CgA, AAT and IL-6r have also been found to be altered or predict development of schizophrenia in ultra-high risk or pre-onset individuals[6,30]. However, to our knowledge only SNPs associated with IL-6r, CgA, vWF and AAT have previously been reported in schizophrenia. The strength of our study was that through genotyping using the PsychArray and profiling of circulating protein using the DiscoveryMAP platform, we have attempted to demonstrate a functional link between expression of protein biomarkers previously implicated in schizophrenia and schizophrenia related SNPs located within genes encoding for the measured proteins. The IL-6r gene has been investigated extensively in previous genetic studies. However, results have not been consistent. While a previous genetic association study of IL-6r reported a significant association of rs2228145 C allele (Ala allele) with schizophrenia[31], others failed to find significant differences in allele or genotype distribution between patients and controls[32]. Another study investigated promoter polymorphism of another IL-6r rs4845617 but found no significant association with schizophrenia in Taiwan[33]. Kapelski and colleagues recently reported a significant association of rs2228145 and rs4537545 with schizophrenia[34]. Rafiq and colleagues found that the minor allele T of rs4537545 accounted for approximately 20% of the variation in circulating IL-6r levels and individuals homozygous for the minor allele of the rs4537545 had a doubling of IL-6r levels compared to the major allele homozygous group[35]. Our results are in line with this finding. We found that individuals homozygous for the minor allele of rs4537545 and its exome SNP exm-rs4537545 had the highest IL-6r levels compared to individuals homozygous for the major allele, which had the lowest IL-6r levels (Table 2). However, rs4537545 x diagnosis interaction was not significant suggesting that the effect of this SNP on IL-6r expression does not vary with diagnosis (patient or control). Analysis stratified by diagnosis also showed significant association between the SNPs (rs4537545 and exm-rs4537545) and IL-6r expression in the control and patient groups separately demonstrating further that these SNPs are associated with IL-6r expression regardless of diagnosis (Supplementary Table 2). In addition to this finding, we also demonstrated that another SNP, rs7553796 located within the IL-6r gene was associated with increasing levels of the IL-6r protein in blood in both the control and schizophrenia groups (Table 3). A significant rs7553796 x diagnosis interaction and subsequent analysis stratified by diagnosis showed that while increasing number of the major allele is associated with increasing IL-6r levels in both groups, schizophrenia patients homozygous for the major allele had significantly higher levels of the IL-6r protein compared to controls homozygous for the major allele (Fig. 2). This finding suggests the possibility of differential regulation of protein expression in schizophrenia patients based on the major allele copy number of rs7553796. The other interesting protein that has been studied extensively is CgA. This protein is widely expressed in secretory granules throughout the central nervous system and in endocrine tissue and is co-released with several neurotransmitters[36]. CgA has calcium binding and neuromodulatory properties and is a potent microglial activator resulting in neurotoxicity mediated through the secretion of glutamate, TNF alpha and nitric oxide which in turn induces mitochondrial stress and apoptosis[36]. Changes in the expression of CgA protein in schizophrenia have been reproducibly shown in post-mortem[37] frontal cortex and pituitary, CSF[38,39] and serum[6,37,40]. Biochemical studies have also demonstrated a reduction of CgA immunoreactivity in the prefrontal cortex of schizophrenic patients[41]. Alterations in CSF CgA levels have also been shown in a range of neurodegenerative disorders, Parkinson’s[42] and Alzheimer’s[43] disease. Allelic-association studies in Chinese patients have associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms at the chromogranin B (CHGB) locus with schizophrenia[44]. Genetic linkage studies in Japanese schizophrenia patients have implicated a genomic region near the CHGB locus on chromosome 20[45]. Subsequent Japanese studies have reported significant associations between schizophrenia and the CHGB gene, which belongs to the same family as CHGA[46]. More recently, studies showing associations between rs9658635 at promoter region and the haplotype of rs9658635rs729940 in the CHGA gene with schizophrenia have also emerged[36]. Through SNP x diagnosis interaction analysis, we found that the effect of the rs9658644 on expression of the CgA protein varied with diagnosis (Table 3). Analysis stratified by diagnosis showed that an increase in number of major alleles of rs9658644 was significantly associated with an increase in expression of the CgA protein in the schizophrenia patient group. In the control group, the major allele was not associated with CgA protein levels in blood (Fig. 2). These results suggest differential regulation of CgA protein expression in patients based on number of rs9658644 major alleles. The SERPINA1 gene, which encodes for the AAT protein has also been implicated in schizophrenia. Association studies demonstrated that the rs1303 displayed different genotype pattern distributions between patient and control individuals[47]. In an earlier study, alleles in this gene have been found to linked to family history of schizophrenia[48]. We found a significant interaction between another SNP, rs11846959, located within the SERPINA1 gene and diagnosis. Through analysis stratified by diagnosis, we demonstrated that rs11846959 was significantly associated with expression of the circulating AAT in the control group but not in the schizophrenia group (Table 3, Fig. 2). In the control group, an increase in the number of major alleles of rs11846959 was significantly associated with a decrease in expression of the AAT protein. Finally, vWF polymorphisms have also been implicated in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder but only in studies investigating co-segregation and genetic associations between von Willebrand’s disease and psychotic disorders[49]. We found that a higher number of major alleles of rs12829220 was significantly associated with an increasing level of the vWF in controls (Table 3, Fig. 2). A limitation of our study was that we were restricted to investigation of SNPs located within genes encoding for a selection of proteins included in the commercially available immunoassay panel. This may explain why we were not able to reproduce recent findings from the largest GWAS study[1]. In addition, despite our efforts to minimise effects of confounding factors on protein expression through implementation of strict exclusion criteria, we cannot rule out the effects of some of the key environmental confounders including menstrual cycle and stress[50]. In conclusion, the data presented here shows that most of the significant SNP and protein associations and SNP x Diagnosis interactions are either directly or indirectly linked to inflammation responses. We found significant associations between SNPs located within genes and their corresponding encoded circulating proteins. Importantly, we demonstrated that significant SNP x Diagnosis interaction was identified for eight serum proteins suggesting that the effect of SNPs on expression of the respective proteins varies with diagnosis. Supplementary Material
  45 in total

1.  Association between interleukin-6 receptor polymorphism and patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Shilong Sun; Fan Wang; Jun Wei; Lian Yuan Cao; Ling Yan Qi; Mei Hong Xiu; Song Chen; Xiang Hong Li; Therese A Kosten; Thomas R Kosten; Xiang Yang Zhang
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Newborn screening for autism: in search of candidate biomarkers.

Authors:  Gerald J Mizejewski; Barbara Lindau-Shepard; Kenneth A Pass
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.851

3.  Identification of a biological signature for schizophrenia in serum.

Authors:  E Schwarz; P C Guest; H Rahmoune; L W Harris; L Wang; F M Leweke; M Rothermundt; B Bogerts; D Koethe; L Kranaster; P Ohrmann; T Suslow; G McAllister; M Spain; A Barnes; N J M van Beveren; S Baron-Cohen; J Steiner; F E Torrey; R H Yolken; S Bahn
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 15.992

4.  A contribution to genome-wide association studies: search for susceptibility loci for schizophrenia using DNA microsatellite markers on chromosomes 19, 20, 21 and 22.

Authors:  Y Kitao; T Inada; T Arinami; C Hirotsu; S Aoki; Y Iijima; T Yamauchi; G Yagi
Journal:  Psychiatr Genet       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.458

5.  Reduction of chromogranin A and B but not C in the cerebrospinal fluid in subjects with schizophrenia.

Authors:  M Landén; B Grenfeldt; P Davidsson; M Stridsberg; B Regland; C G Gottfries; K Blennow
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.600

6.  Data quality control in genetic case-control association studies.

Authors:  Carl A Anderson; Fredrik H Pettersson; Geraldine M Clarke; Lon R Cardon; Andrew P Morris; Krina T Zondervan
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 13.491

7.  Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; Jeroen G Lijmer; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.351

8.  Efficacy of anti-inflammatory agents to improve symptoms in patients with schizophrenia: an update.

Authors:  Iris E Sommer; Roos van Westrhenen; Marieke J H Begemann; Lot D de Witte; Stefan Leucht; René S Kahn
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 9.306

9.  Chromogranin A in cerebrospinal fluid: a biochemical marker for synaptic degeneration in Alzheimer's disease?

Authors:  K Blennow; P Davidsson; A Wallin; R Ekman
Journal:  Dementia       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec

10.  Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  5 in total

1.  Insulin-signaling abnormalities in drug-naïve first-episode schizophrenia: Transduction protein analyses in extracellular vesicles of putative neuronal origin.

Authors:  Dimitrios Kapogiannis; Henrik Dobrowolny; Joyce Tran; Maja Mustapic; Thomas Frodl; Gabriela Meyer-Lotz; Kolja Schiltz; Denny Schanze; Marcella Rietschel; Hans-Gert Bernstein; Johann Steiner
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 5.361

2.  Schizophrenia and Epigenetic Aging Biomarkers: Increased Mortality, Reduced Cancer Risk, and Unique Clozapine Effects.

Authors:  Albert T Higgins-Chen; Marco P Boks; Christiaan H Vinkers; René S Kahn; Morgan E Levine
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  Discovery of rare variants implicated in schizophrenia using next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Raina Rhoades; Fatimah Jackson; Shaolei Teng
Journal:  J Transl Genet Genom       Date:  2019-01-20

4.  Investigation of multi-trait associations using pathway-based analysis of GWAS summary statistics.

Authors:  Guangsheng Pei; Hua Sun; Yulin Dai; Xiaoming Liu; Zhongming Zhao; Peilin Jia
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Profiling of schizophrenia-associated serum peptides by MALDI-TOF-MS.

Authors:  Yingli Fu; Na Zhou; Yaqin Yu; Huiping Zhang; Yaoyao Sun; Mingyuan Zhang; Xin Chen; Yueying Wang; Qiong Yu
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 3.575

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.