Emmanuel Futier1, Jean-Yves Lefrant2, Pierre-Gregoire Guinot3, Thomas Godet1, Emmanuel Lorne3, Philippe Cuvillon2, Sebastien Bertran2, Marc Leone4, Bruno Pastene4, Vincent Piriou5, Serge Molliex6, Jacques Albanese7, Jean-Michel Julia8, Benoit Tavernier9, Etienne Imhoff5, Jean-Etienne Bazin1, Jean-Michel Constantin1, Bruno Pereira10, Samir Jaber11. 1. Département de Médecine Périopératoire, Université Clermont Auvergne, Centre national de la recherche scientifique, Inserm, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France. 2. Section d'Anesthésie and Département Anesthésie et Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nîmes, Nîmes, France. 3. Département Anesthésie et Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens, Amiens, France. 4. Service Anesthésie et Réanimation, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital Nord, Université Aix Marseille, Marseille, France. 5. Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Université Claude Bernard Lyon-1, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France. 6. Département Anesthésie-Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint-Etienne, Saint-Étienne, France. 7. Service Anesthésie et Réanimation, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital de la Conception, Marseille, France. 8. Anesthésie et Réanimation, Clinique du Parc, Castelnau-Le-Lez, France. 9. Pôle Anesthésie-Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Lille, France. 10. Biostatistic Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Clermont-Ferrand, Direction de la Recherche Clinique, Clermont-Ferrand, France. 11. Département Anesthésie et Réanimation B, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, Hôpital Saint-Eloi, and INSERM U-1046, Montpellier, France.
Abstract
Importance: Perioperative hypotension is associated with an increase in postoperative morbidity and mortality, but the appropriate management strategy remains uncertain. Objective: To evaluate whether an individualized blood pressure management strategy tailored to individual patient physiology could reduce postoperative organ dysfunction. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Intraoperative Norepinephrine to Control Arterial Pressure (INPRESS) study was a multicenter, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial conducted in 9 French university and nonuniversity hospitals. Adult patients (n = 298) at increased risk of postoperative complications with a preoperative acute kidney injury risk index of class III or higher (indicating moderate to high risk of postoperative kidney injury) undergoing major surgery lasting 2 hours or longer under general anesthesia were enrolled from December 4, 2012, through August 28, 2016 (last follow-up, September 28, 2016). Interventions: Individualized management strategy aimed at achieving a systolic blood pressure (SBP) within 10% of the reference value (ie, patient's resting SBP) or standard management strategy of treating SBP less than 80 mm Hg or lower than 40% from the reference value during and for 4 hours following surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a composite of systemic inflammatory response syndrome and dysfunction of at least 1 organ system of the renal, respiratory, cardiovascular, coagulation, and neurologic systems by day 7 after surgery. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary outcome, durations of ICU and hospital stay, adverse events, and all-cause mortality at 30 days after surgery. Results: Among 298 patients who were randomized, 292 patients completed the trial (mean [SD] age, 70 [7] years; 44 [15.1%] women) and were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. The primary outcome event occurred in 56 of 147 patients (38.1%) assigned to the individualized treatment strategy vs 75 of 145 patients (51.7%) assigned to the standard treatment strategy (relative risk, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.94; P = .02; absolute risk difference, -14%, 95% CI, -25% to -2%). Sixty-eight patients (46.3%) in the individualized treatment group and 92 (63.4%) in the standard treatment group had postoperative organ dysfunction by day 30 (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.84; P = .001). There were no significant between-group differences in severe adverse events or 30-day mortality. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients predominantly undergoing abdominal surgery who were at increased postoperative risk, management targeting an individualized systolic blood pressure, compared with standard management, reduced the risk of postoperative organ dysfunction. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01536470.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Perioperative hypotension is associated with an increase in postoperative morbidity and mortality, but the appropriate management strategy remains uncertain. Objective: To evaluate whether an individualized blood pressure management strategy tailored to individual patient physiology could reduce postoperative organ dysfunction. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Intraoperative Norepinephrine to Control Arterial Pressure (INPRESS) study was a multicenter, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial conducted in 9 French university and nonuniversity hospitals. Adult patients (n = 298) at increased risk of postoperative complications with a preoperative acute kidney injury risk index of class III or higher (indicating moderate to high risk of postoperative kidney injury) undergoing major surgery lasting 2 hours or longer under general anesthesia were enrolled from December 4, 2012, through August 28, 2016 (last follow-up, September 28, 2016). Interventions: Individualized management strategy aimed at achieving a systolic blood pressure (SBP) within 10% of the reference value (ie, patient's resting SBP) or standard management strategy of treating SBP less than 80 mm Hg or lower than 40% from the reference value during and for 4 hours following surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a composite of systemic inflammatory response syndrome and dysfunction of at least 1 organ system of the renal, respiratory, cardiovascular, coagulation, and neurologic systems by day 7 after surgery. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary outcome, durations of ICU and hospital stay, adverse events, and all-cause mortality at 30 days after surgery. Results: Among 298 patients who were randomized, 292 patients completed the trial (mean [SD] age, 70 [7] years; 44 [15.1%] women) and were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. The primary outcome event occurred in 56 of 147 patients (38.1%) assigned to the individualized treatment strategy vs 75 of 145 patients (51.7%) assigned to the standard treatment strategy (relative risk, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.94; P = .02; absolute risk difference, -14%, 95% CI, -25% to -2%). Sixty-eight patients (46.3%) in the individualized treatment group and 92 (63.4%) in the standard treatment group had postoperative organ dysfunction by day 30 (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.84; P = .001). There were no significant between-group differences in severe adverse events or 30-day mortality. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients predominantly undergoing abdominal surgery who were at increased postoperative risk, management targeting an individualized systolic blood pressure, compared with standard management, reduced the risk of postoperative organ dysfunction. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01536470.
Authors: Thomas G Weiser; Scott E Regenbogen; Katherine D Thompson; Alex B Haynes; Stuart R Lipsitz; William R Berry; Atul A Gawande Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-06-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Pierre Asfar; Ferhat Meziani; Jean-François Hamel; Fabien Grelon; Bruno Megarbane; Nadia Anguel; Jean-Paul Mira; Pierre-François Dequin; Soizic Gergaud; Nicolas Weiss; François Legay; Yves Le Tulzo; Marie Conrad; René Robert; Frédéric Gonzalez; Christophe Guitton; Fabienne Tamion; Jean-Marie Tonnelier; Pierre Guezennec; Thierry Van Der Linden; Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Eric Mariotte; Gaël Pradel; Olivier Lesieur; Jean-Damien Ricard; Fabien Hervé; Damien du Cheyron; Claude Guerin; Alain Mercat; Jean-Louis Teboul; Peter Radermacher Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-03-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Laurent Brochard; Fekri Abroug; Matthew Brenner; Alain F Broccard; Robert L Danner; Miquel Ferrer; Franco Laghi; Sheldon Magder; Laurent Papazian; Paolo Pelosi; Kees H Polderman Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2010-05-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Azra Bihorac; Sinan Yavas; Sophie Subbiah; Charles E Hobson; Jesse D Schold; Andrea Gabrielli; A Joseph Layon; Mark S Segal Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Sachin Kheterpal; Kevin K Tremper; Michael Heung; Andrew L Rosenberg; Michael Englesbe; Amy M Shanks; Darrell A Campbell Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: M Joannidis; S J Klein; S John; M Schmitz; D Czock; W Druml; A Jörres; D Kindgen-Milles; J T Kielstein; M Oppert; V Schwenger; C Willam; A Zarbock Journal: Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed Date: 2018-03-28 Impact factor: 0.840
Authors: Marije Wijnberge; Bart F Geerts; Liselotte Hol; Nikki Lemmers; Marijn P Mulder; Patrick Berge; Jimmy Schenk; Lotte E Terwindt; Markus W Hollmann; Alexander P Vlaar; Denise P Veelo Journal: JAMA Date: 2020-03-17 Impact factor: 56.272