Literature DB >> 32065827

Effect of a Machine Learning-Derived Early Warning System for Intraoperative Hypotension vs Standard Care on Depth and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension During Elective Noncardiac Surgery: The HYPE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Marije Wijnberge1,2, Bart F Geerts1, Liselotte Hol1, Nikki Lemmers1, Marijn P Mulder1,3, Patrick Berge1, Jimmy Schenk1, Lotte E Terwindt1, Markus W Hollmann1, Alexander P Vlaar2, Denise P Veelo1.   

Abstract

Importance: Intraoperative hypotension is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. A machine learning-derived early warning system to predict hypotension shortly before it occurs has been developed and validated. Objective: To test whether the clinical application of the early warning system in combination with a hemodynamic diagnostic guidance and treatment protocol reduces intraoperative hypotension. Design, Setting, and Participants: Preliminary unblinded randomized clinical trial performed in a tertiary center in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, among adult patients scheduled for elective noncardiac surgery under general anesthesia and an indication for continuous invasive blood pressure monitoring, who were enrolled between May 2018 and March 2019. Hypotension was defined as a mean arterial pressure (MAP) below 65 mm Hg for at least 1 minute. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either the early warning system (n = 34) or standard care (n = 34), with a goal MAP of at least 65 mm Hg in both groups. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was time-weighted average of hypotension during surgery, with a unit of measure of millimeters of mercury. This was calculated as the depth of hypotension below a MAP of 65 mm Hg (in millimeters of mercury) × time spent below a MAP of 65 mm Hg (in minutes) divided by total duration of operation (in minutes).
Results: Among 68 randomized patients, 60 (88%) completed the trial (median age, 64 [interquartile range {IQR}, 57-70] years; 26 [43%] women). The median length of surgery was 256 minutes (IQR, 213-430 minutes). The median time-weighted average of hypotension was 0.10 mm Hg (IQR, 0.01-0.43 mm Hg) in the intervention group vs 0.44 mm Hg (IQR, 0.23-0.72 mm Hg) in the control group, for a median difference of 0.38 mm Hg (95% CI, 0.14-0.43 mm Hg; P = .001). The median time of hypotension per patient was 8.0 minutes (IQR, 1.33-26.00 minutes) in the intervention group vs 32.7 minutes (IQR, 11.5-59.7 minutes) in the control group, for a median difference of 16.7 minutes (95% CI, 7.7-31.0 minutes; P < .001). In the intervention group, 0 serious adverse events resulting in death occurred vs 2 (7%) in the control group. Conclusions and Relevance: In this single-center preliminary study of patients undergoing elective noncardiac surgery, the use of a machine learning-derived early warning system compared with standard care resulted in less intraoperative hypotension. Further research with larger study populations in diverse settings is needed to understand the effect on additional patient outcomes and to fully assess safety and generalizability. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03376347.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32065827      PMCID: PMC7078808          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.0592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  24 in total

1.  Major adverse cardiac events in elderly patients with coronary artery disease undergoing noncardiac surgery: A multicenter prospective study in China.

Authors:  Li Xu; Chunhua Yu; Jingmei Jiang; Hong Zheng; Shanglong Yao; Ling Pei; Li Sun; Fang Xue; Yuguang Huang
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 3.250

2.  Hypotension during surgery for high risk patients: cause or consequence of pathology?

Authors:  L Tritapepe
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Intraoperative hypotension and the risk of postoperative adverse outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  E M Wesselink; T H Kappen; H M Torn; A J C Slooter; W A van Klei
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Association between Intraoperative Hypotension and Hypertension and 30-day Postoperative Mortality in Noncardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Terri G Monk; Michael R Bronsert; William G Henderson; Michael P Mangione; S T John Sum-Ping; Deyne R Bentt; Jennifer D Nguyen; Joshua S Richman; Robert A Meguid; Karl E Hammermeister
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Intraoperative hypotension is associated with acute kidney injury in noncardiac surgery: An observational study.

Authors:  Linn Hallqvist; Fredrik Granath; Elin Huldt; Max Bell
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Effect of Individualized vs Standard Blood Pressure Management Strategies on Postoperative Organ Dysfunction Among High-Risk Patients Undergoing Major Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Emmanuel Futier; Jean-Yves Lefrant; Pierre-Gregoire Guinot; Thomas Godet; Emmanuel Lorne; Philippe Cuvillon; Sebastien Bertran; Marc Leone; Bruno Pastene; Vincent Piriou; Serge Molliex; Jacques Albanese; Jean-Michel Julia; Benoit Tavernier; Etienne Imhoff; Jean-Etienne Bazin; Jean-Michel Constantin; Bruno Pereira; Samir Jaber
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Association between Intraoperative Hypotension and Myocardial Injury after Vascular Surgery.

Authors:  Judith A R van Waes; Wilton A van Klei; Duminda N Wijeysundera; Leo van Wolfswinkel; Thomas F Lindsay; W Scott Beattie
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Machine-learning Algorithm to Predict Hypotension Based on High-fidelity Arterial Pressure Waveform Analysis.

Authors:  Feras Hatib; Zhongping Jian; Sai Buddi; Christine Lee; Jos Settels; Karen Sibert; Joseph Rinehart; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Clinical agreement in the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification.

Authors:  Kayla M Knuf; Christopher V Maani; Adrienne K Cummings
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2018-06-19

10.  A Randomized Trial of Continuous Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitoring During Noncardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Kamal Maheshwari; Sandeep Khanna; Gausan Ratna Bajracharya; Natalya Makarova; Quinton Riter; Syed Raza; Jacek B Cywinski; Maged Argalious; Andrea Kurz; Daniel I Sessler
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.108

View more
  66 in total

1.  Preventing Intraoperative Hypotension: Artificial Intelligence versus Augmented Intelligence?

Authors:  Mozziyar Etemadi; Charles W Hogue
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 2.  Non-cardiac surgery in patients with coronary artery disease: risk evaluation and periprocedural management.

Authors:  Davide Cao; Rishi Chandiramani; Davide Capodanno; Jeffrey S Berger; Matthew A Levin; Mary T Hawn; Dominick J Angiolillo; Roxana Mehran
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Artificial intelligence in cardiothoracic surgery.

Authors:  Roger D Dias; Julie A Shah; Marco A Zenati
Journal:  Minerva Cardioangiol       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 1.347

4.  Using digital technologies in clinical trials: Current and future applications.

Authors:  Carmen Rosa; Lisa A Marsch; Erin L Winstanley; Meg Brunner; Aimee N C Campbell
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Bridging the artificial intelligence valley of death in surgical decision-making.

Authors:  Jeremy Balch; Gilbert R Upchurch; Azra Bihorac; Tyler J Loftus
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 6.  Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Surgery: Potential and Challenges.

Authors:  Sebastian Bodenstedt; Martin Wagner; Beat Peter Müller-Stich; Jürgen Weitz; Stefanie Speidel
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2020-11-04

Review 7.  Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension.

Authors:  Xiaoxuan Liu; Samantha Cruz Rivera; David Moher; Melanie J Calvert; Alastair K Denniston
Journal:  Lancet Digit Health       Date:  2020-09-09

Review 8.  Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI extension.

Authors:  Samantha Cruz Rivera; Xiaoxuan Liu; An-Wen Chan; Alastair K Denniston; Melanie J Calvert
Journal:  Lancet Digit Health       Date:  2020-09-09

9.  Using Big Data-Based Neural Network Parallel Optimization Algorithm in Sports Fatigue Warning.

Authors:  Yudong Sun; Yahui He
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-14

10.  Artificial intelligence-assisted clinical decision support for childhood asthma management: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Hee Yun Seol; Pragya Shrestha; Joy Fladager Muth; Chung-Il Wi; Sunghwan Sohn; Euijung Ryu; Miguel Park; Kathy Ihrke; Sungrim Moon; Katherine King; Philip Wheeler; Bijan Borah; James Moriarty; Jordan Rosedahl; Hongfang Liu; Deborah B McWilliams; Young J Juhn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.