Literature DB >> 28973068

Clinician-Level Predictors for Ordering Low-Value Imaging.

Arthur S Hong1,2, Dennis Ross-Degnan3, Fang Zhang3, J Frank Wharam3.   

Abstract

Importance: Clinicians who order unnecessary radiographic imaging may cause financial harm to patients who have increasing levels of cost sharing. Clinician predictors of low-value imaging are largely unknown. Objective: To characterize clinician predictors of low-value imaging for acute uncomplicated back pain and headache, including clinicians who saw both conditions. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multivariate logistic regression modeling of imaging rates after acute uncomplicated back pain and headache visits as indicated by January 2010 to December 2014 commercial insurance claims and demographic data from a large US health insurer. Participants included 100 977 clinicians (primary care physicians, specialist physicians, and chiropractors). Main Outcomes and Measures: Imaging after acute uncomplicated back pain and headache visits was recorded. We identified whether the clinician's prior patient received imaging, whether the clinician was an owner of imaging equipment, and the varying impact by clinician specialty. We then used high rates of low-value back imaging as a predictor for low-value headache imaging.
Results: Clinicians conducted 1 007 392 visits for 878 720 adults ages 18 to 64 years with acute uncomplicated back pain; 52 876 primary care physicians conducted visits for 492 805 adults ages 18 to 64 years with acute uncomplicated headache; 34 190 primary care clinicians conducted 405 721 visits for 344 991 adults ages 18 to 64 years with headache and had also conducted at least 4 visits from patients with back pain. If a primary care physician's prior patient received low-value back imaging, the patient had 1.81 higher odds of low-value imaging (95% CI, 1.77-1.85). This practice effect was larger for chiropractors (odds ratio [OR], 2.80; 95% CI, 2.74-2.86) and specialists (OR, 2.98; 95% CI, 2.88-3.07). For headache, a prior low-value head image predicted 2.00 higher odds of a subsequent head imaging order (95% CI, 1.95-2.06). Clinician ownership of imaging equipment was a consistent independent predictor of low-value imaging (OR, 1.65-7.76) across clinician type and imaging scenario. Primary care physicians with the highest rates of low-value back imaging also had 1.53 (95% CI, 1.45-1.61) higher odds of ordering low-value headache imaging. Conclusions and Relevance: Clinician characteristics such as ordering low-value imaging on a prior patient, high rates of low-value imaging in another clinical scenario, and ownership of imaging equipment are strong predictors of low-value back and headache imaging. Findings should inform policies that target potentially unnecessary and financially burdensome care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28973068      PMCID: PMC5820702          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.4888

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  49 in total

1.  Dramatically increased musculoskeletal ultrasound utilization from 2000 to 2009, especially by podiatrists in private offices.

Authors:  Richard E Sharpe; Levon N Nazarian; Laurence Parker; Vijay M Rao; David C Levin
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.532

2.  The growing power of some providers to win steep payment increases from insurers suggests policy remedies may be needed.

Authors:  Robert A Berenson; Paul B Ginsburg; Jon B Christianson; Tracy Yee
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Full disclosure--out-of-pocket costs as side effects.

Authors:  Peter A Ubel; Amy P Abernethy; S Yousuf Zafar
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Regional variation in Medicare payments for medical imaging: radiologists versus nonradiologists.

Authors:  David A Rosman; Eugene Nsiah; Danny R Hughes; Richard Duszak
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  Physician utilization. The state of research about physicians' practice patterns.

Authors:  J M Eisenberg
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria Headache.

Authors:  Annette C Douglas; Franz J Wippold; Daniel F Broderick; Ashley H Aiken; Sepideh Amin-Hanjani; Douglas C Brown; Amanda S Corey; Isabelle M Germano; James A Hadley; Bharathi D Jagadeesan; Jennifer S Jurgens; Tabassum A Kennedy; Laszlo L Mechtler; Nandini D Patel; Gregory J Zipfel
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Reassurance after diagnostic testing with a low pretest probability of serious disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexandra Rolfe; Christopher Burton
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  Race/ethnicity, gender, and monitoring socioeconomic gradients in health: a comparison of area-based socioeconomic measures--the public health disparities geocoding project.

Authors:  Nancy Krieger; Jarvis T Chen; Pamela D Waterman; David H Rehkopf; S V Subramanian
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Nationwide High-deductible Health Plan Before and After the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  J Frank Wharam; Fang Zhang; Bruce E Landon; Robert LeCates; Stephen Soumerai; Dennis Ross-Degnan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Small Decline In Low-Value Back Imaging Associated With The 'Choosing Wisely' Campaign, 2012-14.

Authors:  Arthur S Hong; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Fang Zhang; J Frank Wharam
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 6.301

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Defining and measuring imaging appropriateness in low back pain studies: a scoping review.

Authors:  Mark Yates; Crystian B Oliveira; James B Galloway; Chris G Maher
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Same-Day vs Different-Day Elective Upper and Lower Endoscopic Procedures by Setting.

Authors:  Peiqi Wang; Susan M Hutfless; Eun J Shin; Christian Hartman; Sarah Disney; Christopher C Fain; Kathy P Bull-Henry; Daniel K Daniels; Tsion Abdi; Vikesh K Singh; Anthony N Kalloo; Martin A Makary
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  Removal of Non-economic Damage Caps Is Not Associated with Reductions in Early Imaging for Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Christopher J Dy; Michael F Pesko; Matthew Keller; Elizabeth Sepper; Margaret A Olsen
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-01-03

4.  Association Between Ownership of Imaging Equipment and Appropriateness of Staging Positron-Emission Tomography in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Authors:  Scott F Huntington; Weiwei Zhu; Jessica R Hoag; Rong Wang; Amer M Zeidan; Smith Giri; Nikolai A Podoltsev; Steven D Gore; Xiaomei Ma; Cary P Gross; Amy J Davidoff
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2019-05-11

Review 5.  Determinants for the use and de-implementation of low-value care in health care: a scoping review.

Authors:  Hanna Augustsson; Sara Ingvarsson; Per Nilsen; Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz; Irene Muli; Jessica Dervish; Henna Hasson
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2021-02-04

6.  Are Emergency Medicine Provider Characteristics Associated With Diagnostic Imaging for Low Back Pain?

Authors:  Jonathan Doucett; Jill Hayden; Kirk D Magee; Rachel Ogilvie
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-03-01

7.  Using behaviour change theory and preliminary testing to develop an implementation intervention to reduce imaging for low back pain.

Authors:  Hazel J Jenkins; Niamh A Moloney; Simon D French; Chris G Maher; Blake F Dear; John S Magnussen; Mark J Hancock
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Factors Influencing Primary Care Providers' Unneeded Lumbar Spine MRI Orders for Acute, Uncomplicated Low-Back Pain: a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Andrea L Nevedal; Eleanor T Lewis; Justina Wu; Josephine Jacobs; Jeffrey G Jarvik; Roger Chou; Paul G Barnett
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 5.128

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.