Literature DB >> 24933450

ACR Appropriateness Criteria Headache.

Annette C Douglas1, Franz J Wippold2, Daniel F Broderick3, Ashley H Aiken4, Sepideh Amin-Hanjani5, Douglas C Brown6, Amanda S Corey7, Isabelle M Germano8, James A Hadley9, Bharathi D Jagadeesan10, Jennifer S Jurgens11, Tabassum A Kennedy12, Laszlo L Mechtler13, Nandini D Patel14, Gregory J Zipfel15.   

Abstract

Most patients presenting with uncomplicated, nontraumatic, primary headache do not require imaging. When history, physical, or neurologic examination elicits "red flags" or critical features of the headache, then further investigation with imaging may be warranted to exclude a secondary cause. Imaging procedures may be diagnostically useful for patients with headaches that are: associated with trauma; new, worse, or abrupt onset; thunderclap; radiating to the neck; due to trigeminal autonomic cephalgia; persistent and positional; and temporal in older individuals. Pregnant patients, immunocompromised individuals, cancer patients, and patients with papilledema or systemic illnesses, including hypercoagulable disorders may benefit from imaging. Unlike most headaches, those associated with cough, exertion, or sexual activity usually require neuroimaging with MRI of the brain with and without contrast to exclude potentially underlying pathology before a primary headache syndrome is diagnosed. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appropriateness criteria; headache; hemorrhage; mass; thunderclap

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24933450     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.03.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  9 in total

1.  Imaging in a 35-year-old woman with progressive headache.

Authors:  Santanu Chakraborty; William D Miller
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Appropriate imaging utilization in Japan: a survey of accredited radiology training hospitals.

Authors:  Kanako K Kumamaru; Sadayuki Murayama; Yasuyuki Yamashita; Takeshi Nojo; Yoshiyuki Watanabe; Mariko Goto; Eriko Maeda; Junko Echigo; Shigeyoshi Soga; Shinya Fujii; Yutaka Tanami; Tetsuhiko Okabe; Masahiro Okada; Jiro Munechika; Hideki Ota; Mototaka Miyake; Hiroshi Honda; Shigeki Aoki
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Computed tomography for non-traumatic headache in the emergency department and the impact of follow-up testing on altering the initial diagnosis.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Quon; Rafael Glikstein; Christopher S Lim; Betty Anne Schwarz
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2015-04-12

4.  The impact of pregnancy on headache evaluation in the emergency department, a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ian Waldman; Stephen Wagner; Kristine Posadas; Timothy A Deimling
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2017-04-05

Review 5.  Appropriate use of neuroimaging in headache.

Authors:  Deena E Kuruvilla; Richard B Lipton
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2015-06

6.  The relationship between abnormal intracranial findings in brain computed tomography and antiplatelet or anticoagulant use in patients with nontraumatic headache: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Caner Iskorur; Mustafa Korkut; Secgin Soyuncu
Journal:  Clin Exp Emerg Med       Date:  2022-06-30

Review 7.  Neuroimaging Wisely.

Authors:  J Buethe; J Nazarian; K Kalisz; M Wintermark
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Clinician-Level Predictors for Ordering Low-Value Imaging.

Authors:  Arthur S Hong; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Fang Zhang; J Frank Wharam
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  A case of giant cell arteritis simultaneously diagnosed with chronic subdural hematoma.

Authors:  Yuichiro Otani; Keishi Kanno; Yuka Kikuchi; Takahiro Kametani; Tomoki Kobayashi; Susumu Tazuma
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2019-11-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.