Literature DB >> 22566436

The growing power of some providers to win steep payment increases from insurers suggests policy remedies may be needed.

Robert A Berenson1, Paul B Ginsburg, Jon B Christianson, Tracy Yee.   

Abstract

In the constant attention paid to what drives health care costs, only recently has scrutiny been applied to the power that some health care providers, particularly dominant hospital systems, wield to negotiate higher payment rates from insurers. Interviews in twelve US communities indicated that so-called must-have hospital systems and large physician groups--providers that health plans must include in their networks so that they are attractive to employers and consumers--can exert considerable market power to obtain steep payment rates from insurers. Other factors, such as offering an important, unique service or access in a particular geographic area, can contribute to provider leverage as well. Even in markets with dominant health plans, insurers generally have not been aggressive in constraining rate increases, perhaps because the insurers can simply pass along the costs to employers and their workers. Although government intervention--through rate setting or antitrust enforcement--has its place, our findings suggest a range of market and regulatory approaches should be examined in any attempt to address the consequences of growing provider market clout.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22566436     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  16 in total

Review 1.  The effects of quality of care on costs: a conceptual framework.

Authors:  Teryl K Nuckols; José J Escarce; Steven M Asch
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Accountable Care Organizations in the United States: market and demographic factors associated with formation.

Authors:  Valerie A Lewis; Carrie H Colla; Kathleen L Carluzzo; Sarah E Kler; Elliott S Fisher
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  How do health insurer market concentration and bargaining power with hospitals affect health insurance premiums?

Authors:  Erin E Trish; Bradley J Herring
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Medical Group Characteristics and the Cost and Quality of Care for Medicare Beneficiaries.

Authors:  Lawrence P Casalino; Patricia Ramsay; Laurence C Baker; Michael F Pesko; Stephen M Shortell
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  The dynamics of community health care consolidation: acquisition of physician practices.

Authors:  Jon B Christianson; Caroline S Carlin; Louise H Warrick
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.911

6.  Variation in inpatient hospital prices and outpatient service quantities drive geographic differences in private spending in Texas.

Authors:  Luisa Franzini; Chapin White; Suthira Taychakhoonavudh; Rohan Parikh; Mark Zezza; Osama Mikhail
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Variation in Payment Rates under Medicare's Inpatient Prospective Payment System.

Authors:  Sam Krinsky; Andrew M Ryan; Tod Mijanovich; Jan Blustein
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Spending per Medicare Beneficiary Is Higher in Hospital-Owned Small- and Medium-Sized Physician Practices.

Authors:  Michael F Pesko; Andrew M Ryan; Stephen M Shortell; Kennon R Copeland; Patricia P Ramsay; Xuming Sun; Jayme L Mendelsohn; Diane R Rittenhouse; Lawrence P Casalino
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  How to work with insurance companies.

Authors:  Joel M Kaufman
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2015-10

10.  Does place of service matter? A utilisation and cost analysis of sexually transmissible infection testing from 2012 claims data.

Authors:  Kwame Owusu-Edusei; Chirag G Patel; Thomas L Gift
Journal:  Sex Health       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.706

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.