Literature DB >> 22305701

Dramatically increased musculoskeletal ultrasound utilization from 2000 to 2009, especially by podiatrists in private offices.

Richard E Sharpe1, Levon N Nazarian, Laurence Parker, Vijay M Rao, David C Levin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Over the past two decades, musculoskeletal (MSK) ultrasound has emerged as an effective means of diagnosing MSK pathologies. However, some insurance providers have expressed concern about increased MSK ultrasound utilization, possibly facilitated by the low cost and ready availability of ultrasound technology. The purpose of this study was to document trends in MSK ultrasound utilization from 2000 to 2009 within the Medicare population.
METHODS: Source data were obtained from the CMS Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary Master Files from 2000 to 2009, and records were extracted for procedures for extremity nonvascular ultrasound. We analyzed annual volume by provider type using specialties, practice settings, and geographic regions where the studies were performed.
RESULTS: In 2000, Medicare reimbursed 56,254 MSK ultrasound studies, which increased to 233,964 in 2009 (+316%). Radiologists performed the largest number of MSK ultrasound studies in 2009, 91,022, an increase from 40,877 in 2000. Podiatrists utilized the next highest number of studies in 2009, 76,332, an increase from 3,920 in 2000. Overall, private office MSK ultrasound procedures increased from 19,372 in 2000 to 158,351 in 2009 (+717%). In 2009, podiatrists performed the largest number of private office procedures (75,544) and accounted for 51.5% of the total private office growth from 2000 to 2009. Radiologist private office procedures totaled 19,894 in 2009, accounting for 9.2% of the total private office MSK ultrasound growth.
CONCLUSIONS: The MSK ultrasound volume increase among nonradiologists, especially podiatrists, was far higher than that among radiologists from 2000 and 2009, with the highest growth in private offices. These findings raise concern for self-referral.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22305701     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2011.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  17 in total

1.  Survey of current trends in postgraduate musculoskeletal ultrasound education in the United States.

Authors:  Netanel S Berko; Shlomit Goldberg-Stein; Beverly A Thornhill; Mordecai Koenigsberg
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Ultrasound guidance to perform intra-articular injection of gadolinium-based contrast material for magnetic resonance arthrography as an alternative to fluoroscopy: the time is now.

Authors:  Carmelo Messina; Giuseppe Banfi; Alberto Aliprandi; Giovanni Mauri; Francesco Secchi; Francesco Sardanelli; Luca Maria Sconfienza
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Current and Prospective Use of Musculoskeletal Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging at Chiropractic Teaching Institutions: A Worldwide Survey of Diagnostic Imaging Staff.

Authors:  Rogan E A Henderson; Bruce F Walker; Kenneth J Young
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-11-22

4.  Incorporation of musculoskeletal ultrasound training into the radiology core curriculum.

Authors:  Netanel S Berko; Jenna N Le; Beverly A Thornhill; Dan Wang; Abdissa Negassa; E Stephen Amis; Mordecai Koenigsberg
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Physician self-referral and imaging use appropriateness: negative cervical spine MRI frequency as an assessment metric.

Authors:  T J Amrhein; B E Paxton; M P Lungren; N T Befera; H R Collins; C Yurko; J D Eastwood; R K Kilani
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Does the use of ultrasound affect contamination of musculoskeletal injections sites?

Authors:  Thomas Sherman; Joseph Ferguson; William Davis; Matthew Russo; Evan Argintar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Clinician-Level Predictors for Ordering Low-Value Imaging.

Authors:  Arthur S Hong; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Fang Zhang; J Frank Wharam
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 8.  The accuracy of diagnostic ultrasound imaging for musculoskeletal soft tissue pathology of the extremities: a comprehensive review of the literature.

Authors:  Rogan E A Henderson; Bruce F Walker; Kenneth J Young
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2015-11-05

9.  Musculoskeletal Ultrasound as a Motivator for Selecting a Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Residency Program in the United States: A Multicenter Survey Study.

Authors:  Altamash E Raja; Alexander Shustorovich; David M Robinson; Kathryn Alfonso; Ryan Meyer; Ryan T Roemmich; Christine Eng; Steve J Wisniewski; Philippines Cabahug
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.159

10.  Musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging standards in the UK: British Society of Skeletal Radiologists (BSSR) position statement.

Authors:  Danoob Dalili; Andrew Carne; James MacKay; Philip O'Connor; David Silver; Philip Robinson; Ramy Mansour
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.