| Literature DB >> 28970540 |
Ming-Ching Wen1,2, Zheyu Xu3, Zhonghao Lu4, Ling Ling Chan5, Eng King Tan4,3,6, Louis C S Tan7,8.
Abstract
Olfactory dysfunction is a robust and early sign for Parkinson's disease (PD). Previous studies have revealed its association with dementia and related neural changes in PD. Yet, how olfactory dysfunction affects white matter (WM) microstructure in newly diagnosed and untreated PD remains unclear. Here we comprehensively examined WM features using unbiased whole-brain analyses. 88 newly diagnosed PD patients without dementia (70 with hyposmia and 18 without hyposmia) and 33 healthy controls underwent clinical assessment and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) scanning. Tract-based special statistics (TBSS), graph-theoretic methods and network-based statistics (NBS) were used to compare regional and network-related WM features between groups. TBSS analysis did not show any differences in fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity between groups. Compared with controls, PD patients without hyposmia showed a significant decrease in global efficiency, whilst PD patients with hyposmia exhibited significantly reduced global and local efficiency and additionally a disrupted connection between the right medial orbitofrontal cortex and left rectus and had poorer frontal-related cognitive functioning. These results demonstrate that hyposmia-related WM changes in early PD only occur at the network level. The confined disconnectivity between the bilateral olfactory circuitry may serve as a biomarker for olfactory dysfunction in early PD.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28970540 PMCID: PMC5624890 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-12947-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Demographic and clinical characteristics.
| HC (n = 33) | Norms-PD (n = 18) | Hypos-PD (n = 70) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
| Age (years) | 57.93 (11.30) | 57.66 (9.26) | 59.69 (7.84) | 0.54 |
| Gender, male (%)† | 60.6 | 38.9 | 61.4 | 0.21 |
| Education (years) | 15.70 (3.18) | 15.72 (2.52) | 15.40 (3.08) | 0.86 |
| Handedness, N (R/L/M)† | 25/ 7/1 | 16/2/0 | 65/3/2 | 0.072 |
| PD duration (months)‡ | — | 7.44 (7.53) | 6.79 (7.15) | 0.73 |
| H&Y, N (1/2)† | — | 9/ 9 | 24/ 46 | 0.17 |
| UPDRS-III | — | 20.06 (8.30) | 20.71 (9.15) | 0.78 |
| UPSIT* | 36.39 (1.60) | 35.94 (1.39) | 17.53 (5.85) | <0.001 |
| MOCA | 28.33 (1.19) | 27.50 (2.38) | 27.63 (2.33) | 0.23 |
| GDS | 1.33 (1.78) | 2.22 (2.51) | 2.47 (2.55) | 0.08 |
| HVLT-Immediate Recall | 47.39 (10.51) | 53.39 (9.36) | 48.61 (13.08) | 0.22 |
| HVLT-Delayed Recall | 48.88 (10.22) | 49.28 (7.80) | 50.36 (12.85) | 0.82 |
| HVLT-Recognition | 50.60 (8.82) | 50.00 (9.07) | 50.80 (10.77) | 0.96 |
| Benton JOL | 13.00 (2.41) | 12.53 (2.18) | 12.00 (2.99) | 0.22 |
| LNS | 11.79 (2.41) | 12.50 (1.76) | 11.86 (2.78) | 0.61 |
| SF (Animal) | 54.00 (9.46) | 53.00 (7.99) | 51.67 (9.71) | 0.49 |
| SDMT§ | 51.74 (12.58) | 46.43 (7.64) | 45.95 (9.32) | 0.03 |
| Head motion | ||||
| Translation (mm) | 0.43 (1.90) | 0.53 (0.25) | 0.45 (0.19) | 0.2 |
| Rotation (degree) | 3.06 × 10−3 (2.47 × 10−3) | 3.70 × 10−3 (3.13 × 10−3) | 3.21 × 10−3 (1.93 × 10−3) | 0.62 |
| Absolute motion (mm) | 1.53 (0.31) | 1.66 (0.34) | 1.55 (0.25) | 0.27 |
Note: all analyses were one-way ANOVA, except †using χ² or Fisher’s Exact test and ‡using independent-samples t test. *Post-hoc analysis indicated significant differences between HC and hypos-PD groups and between norms-PD and hypos-PD groups, but no difference between HC and norms-PD groups. §Post-hoc analysis indicated significant differences between HC and hypos-PD groups; GDS = Geriatric Depression Scale; Handedness: R = right, L = left, M = Mixed; HVLT = Hopkins Verbal Learning Test; H&Y = Hoehn & Yahr staging; JOL = Judgment of Line Test; LNS = Letter-Number Sequencing Test; MOCA = Montreal Cognitive Assessment; SDMT = Symbol-Digit Modalities Test; SF = Semantic Fluency Test; UPDRS-III = MDS-Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale-Motor Subscale; UPSIT = University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test.
Figure 1Group averages and comparisons of topological properties (Note: *p < 0.05 compared with HC, **p < 0.01 compared with HC, †0.05 < p < 0.10 compared with HC; norms-PD = PD patients without hyposmia; hypos-PD = PD patients with hyposmia).
Figure 2Subnetwork between the right medial orbitofrontal cortex (Rt. mOFC) and left rectus (Lt Rec) where PD patients with hyposmia (hypos-PDs) showed decreased connectivity, compared with healthy controls (HCs).