Erin K Donahue1,2, Amjad Murdos3,4, Michael W Jakowec1,2, Nasim Sheikh-Bahaei5,6, Arthur W Toga3,6, Giselle M Petzinger1,2, Farshid Sepehrband3,6. 1. Department of Neurology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA. 2. Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA. 3. Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA. 4. Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA. 5. Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA. 6. Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The glymphatic system, including the perivascular space (PVS), plays a critical role in brain homeostasis. Although mounting evidence from Alzheimer's disease has supported the potential role of PVS in neurodegenerative disorders, its contribution in Parkinson's disease (PD) has not been fully elucidated. Although idiopathic (IPD) and familial PD (FPD) share similar pathophysiology in terms of protein aggregation, the differential impact of PVS on PD subtypes remains unknown. Our objective was to examine the differences in PVS volume fraction in IPD and FPD compared to healthy controls (HCs) and nonmanifest carriers (NMCs). METHODS: A total of 470 individuals were analyzed from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative database, including (1) IPD (n = 179), (2) FPD (LRRK2 [leucine-rich repeat kinase 2], glucocerebrosidase, or α-synuclein) (n = 67), (3) NMC (n = 101), and (4) HCs (n = 84). Total PVS volume fraction (%) was compared using parcellation and quantitation within greater white matter volume at global and regional levels in all cortical and subcortical white matter. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in global and regional PVS volume fraction in PD versus non-PD, particularly in FPD versus NMC and LRRK2 FPD versus NMC. Regionally, FPD and NMC differed in the medial orbitofrontal region, as did LRRK2 FPD versus NMC. Non-PD and PD differed in the medial orbitofrontal region and the banks of the superior temporal regions. IPD and FPD differed in the cuneus and lateral occipital regions. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the role of PVS in PD and highlight a potentially significant contribution of PVS to the pathophysiology of FPD, particularly LRRK2.
BACKGROUND: The glymphatic system, including the perivascular space (PVS), plays a critical role in brain homeostasis. Although mounting evidence from Alzheimer's disease has supported the potential role of PVS in neurodegenerative disorders, its contribution in Parkinson's disease (PD) has not been fully elucidated. Although idiopathic (IPD) and familial PD (FPD) share similar pathophysiology in terms of protein aggregation, the differential impact of PVS on PD subtypes remains unknown. Our objective was to examine the differences in PVS volume fraction in IPD and FPD compared to healthy controls (HCs) and nonmanifest carriers (NMCs). METHODS: A total of 470 individuals were analyzed from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative database, including (1) IPD (n = 179), (2) FPD (LRRK2 [leucine-rich repeat kinase 2], glucocerebrosidase, or α-synuclein) (n = 67), (3) NMC (n = 101), and (4) HCs (n = 84). Total PVS volume fraction (%) was compared using parcellation and quantitation within greater white matter volume at global and regional levels in all cortical and subcortical white matter. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in global and regional PVS volume fraction in PD versus non-PD, particularly in FPD versus NMC and LRRK2 FPD versus NMC. Regionally, FPD and NMC differed in the medial orbitofrontal region, as did LRRK2 FPD versus NMC. Non-PD and PD differed in the medial orbitofrontal region and the banks of the superior temporal regions. IPD and FPD differed in the cuneus and lateral occipital regions. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the role of PVS in PD and highlight a potentially significant contribution of PVS to the pathophysiology of FPD, particularly LRRK2.
Authors: M Anheim; A Elbaz; S Lesage; A Durr; C Condroyer; F Viallet; P Pollak; B Bonaïti; C Bonaïti-Pellié; A Brice Journal: Neurology Date: 2012-01-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Barry Boland; Wai Haung Yu; Olga Corti; Bertrand Mollereau; Alexandre Henriques; Erwan Bezard; Greg M Pastores; David C Rubinsztein; Ralph A Nixon; Michael R Duchen; Giovanna R Mallucci; Guido Kroemer; Beth Levine; Eeva-Liisa Eskelinen; Fanny Mochel; Michael Spedding; Caroline Louis; Olivier R Martin; Mark J Millan Journal: Nat Rev Drug Discov Date: 2018-08-17 Impact factor: 84.694
Authors: Joyce P M van der Vegt; Oliver J Hulme; Simone Zittel; Kristoffer H Madsen; Michael M Weiss; Carsten Buhmann; Bastiaan R Bloem; Alexander Münchau; Hartwig R Siebner Journal: Brain Date: 2013-02-26 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Joanne Trinh; Rim Amouri; John E Duda; James F Morley; Matthew Read; Alan Donald; Carles Vilariño-Güell; Christina Thompson; Chelsea Szu Tu; Emil K Gustavsson; Samia Ben Sassi; Emna Hentati; Mourad Zouari; Emna Farhat; Fatma Nabli; Faycel Hentati; Matthew J Farrer Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2013-11-22 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Daniel G Healy; Mario Falchi; Sean S O'Sullivan; Vincenzo Bonifati; Alexandra Durr; Susan Bressman; Alexis Brice; Jan Aasly; Cyrus P Zabetian; Stefano Goldwurm; Joaquim J Ferreira; Eduardo Tolosa; Denise M Kay; Christine Klein; David R Williams; Connie Marras; Anthony E Lang; Zbigniew K Wszolek; Jose Berciano; Anthony H V Schapira; Timothy Lynch; Kailash P Bhatia; Thomas Gasser; Andrew J Lees; Nicholas W Wood Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2008-06-06 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Ivo D Dinov; John D Van Horn; Kamen M Lozev; Rico Magsipoc; Petros Petrosyan; Zhizhong Liu; Allan Mackenzie-Graham; Paul Eggert; Douglas S Parker; Arthur W Toga Journal: Front Neuroinform Date: 2009-07-20 Impact factor: 4.081
Authors: Kathleen E Hupfeld; Sutton B Richmond; Heather R McGregor; Daniel L Schwartz; Madison N Luther; Nichole E Beltran; Igor S Kofman; Yiri E De Dios; Roy F Riascos; Scott J Wood; Jacob J Bloomberg; Ajitkumar P Mulavara; Lisa C Silbert; Jeffrey J Iliff; Rachael D Seidler; Juan Piantino Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-05-05 Impact factor: 4.996