| Literature DB >> 28962263 |
Yoav Gal1, Ohad Mazor1, Ron Alcalay1, Nehama Seliger1, Moshe Aftalion1, Anita Sapoznikov1, Reut Falach1, Chanoch Kronman1, Tamar Sabo1.
Abstract
Ricin, a highly toxic plant-derived toxin, is considered a potential weapon in biological warfare due to its high availability and ease of preparation. Pulmonary exposure to ricin results in the generation of an acute edematous inflammation followed by respiratory insufficiency and death. Passive immunization with polyclonal anti-ricin antibodies conferred protection against pulmonary ricinosis, however, at clinically-relevant time points for treatment, survival rates were limited. In this study, intranasal instillation of a lethal dose of ricin to mice, served as a lung challenge model for the evaluation and comparison of different therapeutic modalities against pulmonary ricinosis. We show that treatment with doxycycline resulted in a significant reduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines, markers of oxidative stress and capillary permeability in the lungs of the mice. Moreover, survival rates of mice intoxicated with ricin and treated 24 h later with anti-ricin antibody were significantly improved by co-administration of doxycycline. In contrast, co-administration of the steroid drug dexamethasone with anti-ricin antibodies did not increase survival rates when administered at late hours after intoxication, however dexamethasone did exert a positive effect on survival when applied in conjunction with the doxycycline treatment. These studies strongly suggest that combined therapy, comprised of neutralizing anti-ricin antibodies and an appropriate anti-inflammatory agent, can promote high-level protection against pulmonary ricinosis at clinically-relevant time points post-exposure.Entities:
Keywords: Antibodies; BALF, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; ChE, cholinesterase; Combined therapy; Doxycycline; MMP-9, matrix-metalloproteinase-9; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; Pulmonary; RCA, ricinus communis agglutinin; Ricin; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; XO, xanthine oxidase; sPLA2, secretory phospholipase A2
Year: 2014 PMID: 28962263 PMCID: PMC5598361 DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2014.07.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxicol Rep ISSN: 2214-7500
Fig. 1Therapeutic window for post-exposure treatment of ricin-intoxicated mice with anti-ricin antibodies. Mice were intoxicated intranasally with ricin (7 μg/kg body weight) and treated with anti-ricin antibodies at the indicated time points. Animals were observed for a 2-week period after ricin challenge. Curves with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). Number of animals per experimental group: 24 h, 6 h PE: n = 25; 3 h PE: n = 15; 18 h PE: n = 30; 24 h PE: n = 29; untreated: n = 74.
Survival of ricin-intoxicated mice following combined treatment with anti-ricin antibodies and dexamethasone. Survival of mice lethally challenged with ricin (7μg/kg), and treated with anti-ricin antibodies (intranasal, 2× 25μl) at 24 h PE and/or dexamethasone (4 mg/kg body weight) at the indicated time points.
| Time of treatment (h PE) | % Survival | |
|---|---|---|
| Anti-ricin antibodies | Dexamethasone | |
| – | 0, 24 | 3a |
| 24 | – | 34b |
| 24 | −8, 24 | 82c |
| 24 | 6, 24 | 44b |
| 24 | 24 | 30b |
Represent groups displaying significant statistic difference (a, b, c).
Fig. 2Pro-inflammatory cytokines in the BALF of ricin intoxicated mice. Mice were intranasally exposed to 7 μg/kg ricin and BALF samples collected at the indicated time points were monitored for: A. IL-1β (squares), TNF-α (triangles), B. IL-6. Data are mean ± S.E.M. N = 5.
Fig. 3Markers of vascular permeability in the BALF of ricin-intoxicated mice. Mice were intranasally exposed to 7 μg/kg ricin and BALF samples collected at the indicated time points were monitored for: (A) VEGF, (B) ChE. Data are mean ± S.E.M. N = 5.
Fig. 4Oxidative, lipolytic and proteolytic pro-inflammatory parameters in the BALF of ricin-intoxicated mice. Mice were intranasally exposed to 7 μg/kg ricin and BALF samples collected at the indicated time points were monitored for: (A) xanthine oxidase (XO), (B) secretory phospholipase A2 (sPLA2), (C) matrix-metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9). Data are mean ± S.E.M. N = 5.
Fig. 5Pathological and pro-inflammatory changes in the BALF of ricin intoxicated mice following treatment with α-ricin antibodies or with α-ricin antibodies and doxycycline. Mice were intranasally exposed to 7 μg/kg ricin and subjected to different treatment modes. (A) Ricin-intoxicated mice were treated with doxycycline immediately after intoxication and BALF collected at 72 h was monitored for IL-1β, IL-6, VEGF, ChE and XO. (B) Ricin-intoxicated mice were treated with doxycycline and/or anti-ricin antibodies and BALF collected at 72 h was monitored for MMP-9. (C) Ricin-intoxicated mice were treated with doxycycline and lungs were harvested at 72 h PE and weighed. Wet lung weight is presented as percent of total body weight. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean of the samples. *p < 0.05 in comparison to non-treated mice. N = 5.
Fig. 6Kaplan–Meier survival curves of mice intoxicated with ricin and subjected to post-exposure treatment. Mice were intoxicated intranasally with ricin (7 μg/kg) and subjected to various treatments as indicated. Animals were observed for a 2-week period after ricin challenge. The various treatments were commenced at 24 h post exposure and included α-ricin antibodies (Ab), doxycycline (dox), or dexamethasone (dex), or their combinations, as indicated within the figure (n = 29–31). Curves corresponding to the “untreated” and “Ab” groups are those displayed in Fig. 1.