Literature DB >> 28960111

Evaluating Molecular Biomarkers for the Early Detection of Lung Cancer: When Is a Biomarker Ready for Clinical Use? An Official American Thoracic Society Policy Statement.

Peter J Mazzone, Catherine Rufatto Sears, Doug A Arenberg, Mina Gaga, Michael K Gould, Pierre P Massion, Vish S Nair, Charles A Powell, Gerard A Silvestri, Anil Vachani, Renda Soylemez Wiener.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Molecular biomarkers have the potential to improve the current state of early lung cancer detection. The goal of this project was to develop a policy statement that provides guidance about the level of evidence required to determine that a molecular biomarker, used to support early lung cancer detection, is appropriate for clinical use.
METHODS: An ad hoc project steering committee was formed, to include individuals with expertise in the early detection of lung cancer and molecular biomarker development, from inside and outside of the Assembly on Thoracic Oncology. Key questions, generated from the results of a survey of the project steering committee, were discussed at an in-person meeting. Results of the discussion were summarized in a policy statement that was circulated to the steering committee and revised multiple times to achieve consensus.
RESULTS: With a focus on the clinical applications of lung cancer screening and lung nodule evaluation, the policy statement outlines categories of results that should be reported in the early phases of molecular biomarker development, discusses the level of evidence that would support study of the clinical utility, describes the outcomes that should be proven to consider a molecular biomarker clinically useful, and suggests study designs capable of assessing these outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: The application of molecular biomarkers to assist with the early detection of lung cancer has the potential to substantially improve our ability to select patients for lung cancer screening, and to assist with the characterization of indeterminate lung nodules. We have described relevant considerations and have suggested standards to apply when determining whether a molecular biomarker for the early detection of lung cancer is ready for clinical use.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical utility; lung cancer screening; lung nodules; outcomes; study design

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28960111      PMCID: PMC5803661          DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201708-1678ST

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  65 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 2.  Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer.

Authors:  M S Pepe; R Etzioni; Z Feng; J D Potter; M L Thompson; M Thornquist; M Winget; Y Yasui
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-07-18       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  A risk model for prediction of lung cancer.

Authors:  Margaret R Spitz; Waun Ki Hong; Christopher I Amos; Xifeng Wu; Matthew B Schabath; Qiong Dong; Sanjay Shete; Carol J Etzel
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Tumor marker utility grading system: a framework to evaluate clinical utility of tumor markers.

Authors:  D F Hayes; R C Bast; C E Desch; H Fritsche; N E Kemeny; J M Jessup; G Y Locker; J S Macdonald; R G Mennel; L Norton; P Ravdin; S Taube; R J Winn
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1996-10-16       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 5.  Obstacles to and Solutions for a Successful Lung Cancer Screening Program.

Authors:  Peter J Mazzone
Journal:  Semin Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.119

6.  Biases introduced by choosing controls to match risk factors of cases in biomarker research.

Authors:  Margaret Sullivan Pepe; Jing Fan; Christopher W Seymour; Christopher Li; Ying Huang; Ziding Feng
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  Is prostate cancer screening cost-effective? A microsimulation model of prostate-specific antigen-based screening for British Columbia, Canada.

Authors:  Reka Pataky; Roman Gulati; Ruth Etzioni; Peter Black; Kim N Chi; Andrew J Coldman; Tom Pickles; Scott Tyldesley; Stuart Peacock
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Leveraging biospecimen resources for discovery or validation of markers for early cancer detection.

Authors:  Sheri D Schully; Danielle M Carrick; Leah E Mechanic; Sudhir Srivastava; Garnet L Anderson; John A Baron; Christine D Berg; Jennifer Cullen; Eleftherios P Diamandis; V Paul Doria-Rose; Katrina A B Goddard; Susan E Hankinson; Lawrence H Kushi; Eric B Larson; Lisa M McShane; Richard L Schilsky; Steven Shak; Steven J Skates; Nicole Urban; Barnett S Kramer; Muin J Khoury; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Biospecimen Reporting for Improved Study Quality.

Authors:  Helen M Moore; Andrea Kelly; Scott D Jewell; Lisa M McShane; Douglas P Clark; Renata Greenspan; Pierre Hainaut; Daniel F Hayes; Paula Kim; Elizabeth Mansfield; Olga Potapova; Peter Riegman; Yaffa Rubinstein; Edward Seijo; Stella Somiari; Peter Watson; Heinz-Ulrich Weier; Claire Zhu; Jim Vaught
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.300

10.  Cost-effectiveness of multiplexed predictive biomarker screening in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Dorothy Romanus; Stephanie Cardarella; David Cutler; Mary Beth Landrum; Neal I Lindeman; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 15.609

View more
  29 in total

1.  Biomarkers in malignant mesothelioma-an unfulfilled need or a waste of resources?

Authors:  Robin Cornelissen; Joachim G J V Aerts
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Multi-analyte assays and early detection of common cancers.

Authors:  Robert P Young; Timothy Christmas; Raewyn J Hopkins
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Robert P Young; Raewyn J Hopkins
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-06

4.  Statistical inference for net benefit measures in biomarker validation studies.

Authors:  Tracey L Marsh; Holly Janes; Margaret S Pepe
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  5-year overall survival in patients with lung cancer eligible or ineligible for screening according to US Preventive Services Task Force criteria: a prospective, observational cohort study.

Authors:  Yung-Hung Luo; Lei Luo; Jason A Wampfler; Yi Wang; Dan Liu; Yuh-Min Chen; Alex A Adjei; David E Midthun; Ping Yang
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Ultrasensitive detection of circulating tumour DNA via deep methylation sequencing aided by machine learning.

Authors:  Naixin Liang; Bingsi Li; Ziqi Jia; Chenyang Wang; Pancheng Wu; Tao Zheng; Yanyu Wang; Fujun Qiu; Yijun Wu; Jing Su; Jiayue Xu; Feng Xu; Huiling Chu; Shuai Fang; Xingyu Yang; Chengju Wu; Zhili Cao; Lei Cao; Zhongxing Bing; Hongsheng Liu; Li Li; Cheng Huang; Yingzhi Qin; Yushang Cui; Han Han-Zhang; Jianxing Xiang; Hao Liu; Xin Guo; Shanqing Li; Heng Zhao; Zhihong Zhang
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 25.671

Review 7.  Circulating tumor DNA as an early cancer detection tool.

Authors:  Andrea Campos-Carrillo; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Prativa Sahoo; Russell Rockne; Janet V Mokhnatkin; Muhammed Murtaza; Stacy W Gray; Laura Goetz; Ajay Goel; Nicholas Schork; Thomas P Slavin
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 12.310

8.  Contribution of a Blood-Based Protein Biomarker Panel to the Classification of Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules.

Authors:  Edwin J Ostrin; Leonidas E Bantis; David O Wilson; Nikul Patel; Renwei Wang; Deepali Kundnani; Jennifer Adams-Haduch; Jennifer B Dennison; Johannes F Fahrmann; Hsienchang Thomas Chiu; Adi Gazdar; Ziding Feng; Jian-Min Yuan; Samir M Hanash
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 15.609

9.  Exhaled volatile organic compounds analysis in clinical pediatrics: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rosa A Sola Martínez; José M Pastor Hernández; Óscar Yanes Torrado; Manuel Cánovas Díaz; Teresa de Diego Puente; María Vinaixa Crevillent
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 3.756

10.  Accurate diagnosis of pulmonary nodules using a noninvasive DNA methylation test.

Authors:  Wenhua Liang; Zhiwei Chen; Caichen Li; Jun Liu; Jinsheng Tao; Xin Liu; Dezhi Zhao; Weiqiang Yin; Hanzhang Chen; Chao Cheng; Fenglei Yu; Chunfang Zhang; Luxu Liu; Hui Tian; Kaican Cai; Xiang Liu; Zheng Wang; Ning Xu; Qing Dong; Liang Chen; Yue Yang; Xiuyi Zhi; Hui Li; Xixiang Tu; Xiangrui Cai; Zeyu Jiang; Hua Ji; Lili Mo; Jiaxuan Wang; Jian-Bing Fan; Jianxing He
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 14.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.