Rosa A Sola Martínez1, José M Pastor Hernández1, Óscar Yanes Torrado2,3,4, Manuel Cánovas Díaz1, Teresa de Diego Puente5, María Vinaixa Crevillent2,3,4. 1. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (B) and Immunology, University of Murcia and Murcian Institute of Biosanitary Research Virgen de la Arrixaca (IMIB), Murcia, Spain. 2. Department of Electronic Engineering, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain. 3. Institut d'Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili (IISPV), Metabolomics Platform, Reus, Spain. 4. CIBER de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas Asociadas (CIBERDEM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. 5. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (B) and Immunology, University of Murcia and Murcian Institute of Biosanitary Research Virgen de la Arrixaca (IMIB), Murcia, Spain. tdp@um.es.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Measured exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in breath also referred to as exhaled volatilome have been long claimed as a potential source of non-invasive and clinically applicable biomarkers. However, the feasibility of using exhaled volatilome in clinical practice remains to be demonstrated, particularly in pediatrics where the need for improved non-invasive diagnostic and monitoring methods is most urgent. This work presents the first formal evidence-based judgment of the clinical potential of breath volatilome in the pediatric population. METHODS: A rigorous systematic review across Web of Science, SCOPUS, and PubMed databases following the PRISMA statement guidelines. A narrative synthesis of the evidence was conducted and QUADAS-2 was used to assess the quality of selected studies. RESULTS: Two independent reviewers deemed 22 out of the 229 records initially found to satisfy inclusion criteria. A summary of breath VOCs found to be relevant for several respiratory, infectious, and metabolic pathologies was conducted. In addition, we assessed their associated metabolism coverage through a functional characterization analysis. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that current research remains stagnant in a preclinical exploratory setting. Designing exploratory experiments in compliance with metabolomics practice should drive forward the clinical translation of VOCs breath analysis. IMPACT: What is the key message of your article? Metabolomics practice could help to achieve the clinical utility of exhaled volatilome analysis. What does it add to the existing literature? This work is the first systematic review focused on disease status discrimination using analysis of exhaled breath in the pediatric population. A summary of the reported exhaled volatile organic compounds is conducted together with a functional characterization analysis. What is the impact? Having noted challenges preventing the clinical translation, we summary metabolomics practices and the experimental designs that are closer to clinical practice to create a framework to guide future trials.
BACKGROUND: Measured exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in breath also referred to as exhaled volatilome have been long claimed as a potential source of non-invasive and clinically applicable biomarkers. However, the feasibility of using exhaled volatilome in clinical practice remains to be demonstrated, particularly in pediatrics where the need for improved non-invasive diagnostic and monitoring methods is most urgent. This work presents the first formal evidence-based judgment of the clinical potential of breath volatilome in the pediatric population. METHODS: A rigorous systematic review across Web of Science, SCOPUS, and PubMed databases following the PRISMA statement guidelines. A narrative synthesis of the evidence was conducted and QUADAS-2 was used to assess the quality of selected studies. RESULTS: Two independent reviewers deemed 22 out of the 229 records initially found to satisfy inclusion criteria. A summary of breath VOCs found to be relevant for several respiratory, infectious, and metabolic pathologies was conducted. In addition, we assessed their associated metabolism coverage through a functional characterization analysis. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that current research remains stagnant in a preclinical exploratory setting. Designing exploratory experiments in compliance with metabolomics practice should drive forward the clinical translation of VOCs breath analysis. IMPACT: What is the key message of your article? Metabolomics practice could help to achieve the clinical utility of exhaled volatilome analysis. What does it add to the existing literature? This work is the first systematic review focused on disease status discrimination using analysis of exhaled breath in the pediatric population. A summary of the reported exhaled volatile organic compounds is conducted together with a functional characterization analysis. What is the impact? Having noted challenges preventing the clinical translation, we summary metabolomics practices and the experimental designs that are closer to clinical practice to create a framework to guide future trials.
Authors: L Blanchet; A Smolinska; A Baranska; E Tigchelaar; M Swertz; A Zhernakova; J W Dallinga; C Wijmenga; F J van Schooten Journal: J Breath Res Date: 2017-02-22 Impact factor: 3.262
Authors: L Bennett; L Ciaffoni; W Denzer; G Hancock; A D Lunn; R Peverall; S Praun; G A D Ritchie Journal: J Breath Res Date: 2009-12-02 Impact factor: 3.262
Authors: Niki Fens; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Marc P van der Schee; Selma B de Nijs; Erica Dijkers; Albert C Roldaan; David Cheung; Elisabeth H Bel; Peter J Sterk Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2009-08-27 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Anton Amann; Ben de Lacy Costello; Wolfram Miekisch; Jochen Schubert; Bogusław Buszewski; Joachim Pleil; Norman Ratcliffe; Terence Risby Journal: J Breath Res Date: 2014-06-19 Impact factor: 3.262
Authors: Diana Poli; Paolo Carbognani; Massimo Corradi; Matteo Goldoni; Olga Acampa; Bruno Balbi; Luca Bianchi; Michele Rusca; Antonio Mutti Journal: Respir Res Date: 2005-07-14
Authors: Rosa Alba Sola Martínez; José María Pastor Hernández; Gema Lozano Terol; Julia Gallego-Jara; Luis García-Marcos; Manuel Cánovas Díaz; Teresa de Diego Puente Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-12-15 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Rosa A Sola-Martínez; Manuel Sanchez-Solis; Gema Lozano-Terol; Julia Gallego-Jara; Luis García-Marcos; Manuel Cánovas Díaz; Teresa de Diego Puente Journal: Pediatr Pulmonol Date: 2022-02-07
Authors: Rosa A Sola-Martínez; Gema Lozano-Terol; Julia Gallego-Jara; Eva Morales; Esther Cantero-Cano; Manuel Sanchez-Solis; Luis García-Marcos; Pedro Jiménez-Guerrero; José A Noguera-Velasco; Manuel Cánovas Díaz; Teresa de Diego Puente Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-07-05 Impact factor: 4.379