Literature DB >> 31255490

5-year overall survival in patients with lung cancer eligible or ineligible for screening according to US Preventive Services Task Force criteria: a prospective, observational cohort study.

Yung-Hung Luo1, Lei Luo2, Jason A Wampfler3, Yi Wang4, Dan Liu5, Yuh-Min Chen6, Alex A Adjei7, David E Midthun8, Ping Yang9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends lung cancer screening among individuals aged 55-80 years with a 30 pack-year cigarette smoking history and, if they are former smokers, those who quit within the past 15 years. Our previous report found that two-thirds of newly diagnosed patients with lung cancer do not meet these criteria; they are reported to be either long-term quitters (≥15 years since quitting) or from a younger age group (age 50-54 years). We aimed to assess survival outcomes in these two subgroups.
METHODS: For this prospective, observational cohort study we identified and followed up patients aged 50-80 years with lung cancer, with a smoking history of 30 pack-years or more, and included both current smokers and former smokers who quit within the past 30 years. We identified patients from two cohorts in the USA: a hospital cohort (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN) and a community cohort (Olmsted County, MN). Patients were divided into those meeting USPSTF criteria (USPSTF group) versus those not meeting USPSTF criteria (long-term quitters or the younger age group). The main outcome was overall survival at 5 years after diagnosis. 5-year overall survival was analysed with and without matching age and pack-years smoked for long-term quitters. The USPSTF group was subdivided into two age subgroups (55-69 years and 70-80 years) for multivariable regression analysis.
FINDINGS: Between Jan 1, 1997, and Dec 31, 2017, 8739 patients with lung cancer were identified and followed up. Median follow-up was 6·5 (IQR 3·8-10·0) years, and median overall survival was 16·9 months (95% CI 16·2-17·5). 5-year overall survival was 27% (95% CI 25-30) in long-term quitters, 22% (19-25) in the younger age group, and 23% (22-24) in the USPSTF group. In both cohorts, 5-year overall survival did not differ significantly between long-term quitters and the USPSTF group (hospital cohort: hazard ratio [HR] 1·02 [95% CI 0·94-1·10]; p=0·72; community cohort: 0·97 [0·75-1·26]; p=0·82); matched analysis showed similar results in both cohorts. 5-year overall survival also did not differ significantly between the younger age group and the USPSTF group in both cohorts (hospital cohort: HR 1·16 [95% CI 0·98-1·38], p=0·08; community cohort: 1·16 [0·74-1·82]; p=0·52); multivariable regression analyses stratified by age group yielded similar findings.
INTERPRETATION: Patients with lung cancer who quit 15 or more years before diagnosis and those who are up to 5 years younger than the age cutoff recommended for screening, but otherwise meet USPSTF criteria, have a similar risk of death to those individuals who meet all USPSTF criteria. Individuals in both subgroups could benefit from screening, as expansion of USPSTF screening criteria to include these subgroups could enable earlier detection of lung cancer and improved survival outcomes. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health and the Mayo Clinic Foundation.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31255490      PMCID: PMC6669095          DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30329-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  25 in total

1.  The American Association for Thoracic Surgery guidelines for lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography scans for lung cancer survivors and other high-risk groups.

Authors:  Michael T Jaklitsch; Francine L Jacobson; John H M Austin; John K Field; James R Jett; Shaf Keshavjee; Heber MacMahon; James L Mulshine; Reginald F Munden; Ravi Salgia; Gary M Strauss; Scott J Swanson; William D Travis; David J Sugarbaker
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Peak and decline in cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence at old ages.

Authors:  Charles Harding; Francesco Pompei; Richard Wilson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Predictors of adverse smoking outcomes in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  Samantha A Barry; Martin C Tammemagi; Sofiya Penek; Elisabeth C Kassan; Caroline S Dorfman; Thomas L Riley; John Commin; Kathryn L Taylor
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Global cancer statistics.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Freddie Bray; Melissa M Center; Jacques Ferlay; Elizabeth Ward; David Forman
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Histologic grade is an independent prognostic factor for survival in non-small cell lung cancer: an analysis of 5018 hospital- and 712 population-based cases.

Authors:  Zhifu Sun; Marie-Christine Aubry; Claude Deschamps; Randolph S Marks; Scott H Okuno; Brent A Williams; Hiroshi Sugimura; V Shane Pankratz; Ping Yang
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Computed Tomography Screening Workshop 2011 report.

Authors:  John K Field; Robert A Smith; Denise R Aberle; Matthijs Oudkerk; David R Baldwin; David Yankelevitz; Jesper Holst Pedersen; Scott James Swanson; William D Travis; Ignacio I Wisbuba; Masayuki Noguchi; Jim L Mulshine
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 15.609

8.  Applying the National Lung Screening Trial eligibility criteria to the US population: what percent of the population and of incident lung cancers would be covered?

Authors:  Paul F Pinsky; Christine D Berg
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 2.136

9.  Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities.

Authors:  Vivek H Murthy; Harlan M Krumholz; Cary P Gross
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Screening for lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Frank C Detterbeck; Peter J Mazzone; David P Naidich; Peter B Bach
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  16 in total

1.  Barriers to lung cancer referral, diagnosis, and treatment in Central America and the Caribbean: the health professionals' perspectives.

Authors:  Aziza Maklouf-Quirós; Johayra Simithy; Kavita Ragoobar; Vivian Flores-Siles; Allan Ramos-Esquivel; Karen Villamil; Marianne Chacón-Araya
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Mechanisms of resistance to chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Hye-Young Min; Ho-Young Lee
Journal:  Arch Pharm Res       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 4.946

3.  Dual-responsive nanoparticles loading bevacizumab and gefitinib for molecular targeted therapy against non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Zi-Tong Zhao; Jue Wang; Lei Fang; Xin-di Qian; Ying Cai; Hai-Qiang Cao; Guan-Ru Wang; Mei-Lin He; Yan-Yan Jiang; Dang-Ge Wang; Ya-Ping Li
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  β-elemene suppresses tumor metabolism and stem cell-like properties of non-small cell lung cancer cells by regulating PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling.

Authors:  Guangyu Cheng; Lin Li; Qingjie Li; Shulin Lian; Hongbo Chu; Yunlu Ding; Chikun Li; Yan Leng
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 5.942

5.  A cost-utility analysis of the impact of electronic nicotine delivery systems on health care costs and outcomes in Canada.

Authors:  Catherine Pound; Doug Coyle
Journal:  Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  ERS International Congress, Madrid, 2019: highlights from the Thoracic Oncology Assembly.

Authors:  Adrien Costantini; Clementine Bostantzoglou; Torsten Gerriet Blum
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2020-07-20

7.  MiR-449b-5p targets lncRNA PSMG3-AS1 to suppress cancer cell proliferation in lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Na Yue; Ming Ye; Ran Zhang; Yunquan Guo
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.317

8.  MiR-135a inhibits non-small cell lung cancer progression by suppressing RAB1B expression and the RAS pathway.

Authors:  Ye Tian; Lei Zhang; Qian Yu; Zelong Wang; Xueying Yang
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 5.682

9.  Barriers to Low-Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening among Middle-Aged Chinese.

Authors:  Qike Jia; Hongliang Chen; Xuewei Chen; Qichuan Tang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  [Mechanism of DERL3 Affecting the Proliferation, Invasion and Metastasis of Lung Adenocarcinoma A549 Cells].

Authors:  Dandan Zhou; Jiemin Wang; Ke Yang; Liping Zhang; Quan Zheng; Jun Bai; Yaqiong Hu; Qingjie Mu; Chonggao Yin; Hongli Li
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2020-08-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.