| Literature DB >> 33869841 |
Sunday Adewale Akintelu1,2, Bo Yao1, Aderonke Similoluwa Folorunso3.
Abstract
Nanotechnology and nanoscience are gaining remarkable attention in this era due to their distinctive properties and multi applications. Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) is one of the most relevant metal nanoparticles with enormous applications in various field of research and industries. The demand for AuNPs is increasing rapidly. Extensive awareness has been allotted to the development of novel approaches for the synthesis of AuNPs with quality morphological properties using biological sources due to the limitations associated with the chemical and physical methods. Several factors such as contact time, temperature, pH of solution media, concentration of gold precursors and volume of plant extract influences the synthesis, characterization and applications of AuNPs. Characterization of synthesized AuNPs is important in evaluating the morphological properties of AuNPs since the morphological properties of AuNPs affect their potential use in various applications. This review highlights various methods of synthesizing AuNPs, parameters influencing the biosynthesis of AuNPs from plant extract, several techniques used for AuNPs characterization and their potential in bioremediation and biomedical applications.Entities:
Keywords: Bioremediation and pharmacological applications; Gold nanoparticles; Plant materials; Synthesis
Year: 2021 PMID: 33869841 PMCID: PMC8035509 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06591
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Characterization analysis of some biosynthesized AuNPs using plant sources.
| S/N | Plants name | Plants parts | SPR peak (nm) | Functional group prediction | Techniques for Morphological Assessment | Shape | Size | Ref. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leaf | 520 | 3412 | O–H | EDX, FTIR, TEM, SEM, UV, XRD | Spherical | 60–80 | [ | |
| 2927 | C–H | ||||||||
| 1758 | C=O | ||||||||
| 1454 | C–C | ||||||||
| 1327 | N–O | ||||||||
| 1250 | C–N | ||||||||
| 2 | Flower | 540 | 3421 | O–H | EDX, UV,XRD, | spherical | 10–16 | [ | |
| 2924 2855 | C–H | ||||||||
| 2357 | C–N | ||||||||
| 1642 | C=O | ||||||||
| 1549 | C–C | ||||||||
| 3 | Fruit | 563 | 3357 | O–H | FESEM, AFM,UV, DLS, XRD, FTIR | triangular | 74.32 | [ | |
| 2950 | C–H | ||||||||
| 1634 | C–N | ||||||||
| 1389 | C=O | ||||||||
| 4 | Oil | 520 | 3009 | O–H | TEM, XRD, UV,FTIR,DLS | decahedral | 48.8 | [ | |
| 29222853 | C–H | ||||||||
| 1743 | C=O | ||||||||
| 1653 | C=C | ||||||||
| 5 | - | 500–600 | 3291 | O–H | FTIR,TEM,ZP,UV | Spherical, triangular | 3.85–77.13 | [ | |
| 2158 | C–N | ||||||||
| 1634 | C=C | ||||||||
| 6 | - | 538 | 3450 | O–H | FESEM,UV,FTIR,DLS | spherical | 34 | [ | |
| 1630 | C=O | ||||||||
| 7 | - | 537 | 3500 | O–H | FESEM,UV,FTIR,DLS | spherical | 33.80 | [ | |
| 1624 | C=O | ||||||||
| 8 | Fruit | 519 | 3440–3367 | O–H | UV,TEM,ZP,FTIR, EDX | Spherical | 18 | [ | |
| 2800–3000 | C–H | ||||||||
| 1620–1606 | N–H | ||||||||
| 9 | Fruit | 523 | 3440–3367 | O–H | UV,TEM,ZP,FTIR, EDX | Spherical | 24 | [ | |
| 2800–3000 | C–H | ||||||||
| 1620–1606 | N–H | ||||||||
| 10 | Fruit | 526 | 3440–3367 | O–H | UV,TEM,ZP,FTIR,SAED,EDX | Spherical | 16 | [ | |
| 2800–3000 | C–H | ||||||||
| 1620–1606 | N–H | ||||||||
| 11 | - | 540 | 3263 | O–H | UV,EDX,TEM, FTIR, XRD,SEM,ZP | Polygonal, rod | 68 | [ | |
| 2926 | C–H | ||||||||
| 1716 | C=O | ||||||||
| 12 | juice | 557 | 975–3650 | O–H | TEM,FTIR,UV | Spherical | 82 | [ | |
| 1503–1687 | C=O | ||||||||
| 13 | pulp | 560 | 3451 | O–H | TEM,FTIR,UV,XRD | spherical, triangular | 0–20 | [ | |
| 2922 | C–H | ||||||||
| 1640 | C=O | ||||||||
| 14 | Whole plant | 520 | 3448 | O–H | TEM,FTIR,UV,XRD,ZP | Spherical | 20–80 | [ | |
| 2077 | C–H | ||||||||
| 1637 | C=O | ||||||||
| 15 | Leaf | 540 | 3399 | N–H | UV,DLS,SEM,FTIR,FESEM | hexagonal | 40–60 | [ | |
| 2135 | C–H | ||||||||
| 1645 | C=O | ||||||||
| 16 | Leaf | 533 | EDX,ERD,TEM,UV,FTIR | Triangular, hexagonal | 20 | [ | |||
| 17 | husk | 550 | - | - | XRD,EDX,TEM,FTIR,UV | Spherical | 10–30 | [ | |
| 18 | Leaf | 554–532 | 3600–3200 | O–H | UV,FTIR,TEM,EDX,ZP | Spherical | 8–30 | [ | |
| 2900–2800 | C–H | ||||||||
| 1725-1720 | C=O | ||||||||
| 1612 1640 | C=O | ||||||||
| 19 | Leaf | 537 | - | - | UV,SEM,EDX | Spherical | 13–57 | [ | |
| 20 | Leaf | 560 | 3415 | N–H.O–H | EDX,XRD,UV,FTIR.TEM,DLS, | spherical | 25 | [ | |
| 1585 | C=C | ||||||||
| 1067 | C–N | ||||||||
| 21 | Peel | 535 | 3631 | O–H | UV,FESEM,EDX,XRD, FTIR | spherical triangular | 45.42 | [ | |
| 1645 | C=O | ||||||||
| 1321 | C–N | ||||||||
| 22 | Bark | 547–536 | 3776 | O–H | EDX,XRD,DLSHRTEM,UV,FTIR | Spherical | 18.2 | [ | |
| 3584 | N–H | ||||||||
| 3116 2910 | C–H | ||||||||
| 1643 | C=O | ||||||||
| 1512 | C=C | ||||||||
| 23 | Fruit | 531 | 3430 | O–H | UV,FTIR,DLS,TEM | spherical and oval | 27 | [ | |
| 2962 | C=O | ||||||||
| 1617 | C=C | ||||||||
| 24 | Leaf | 540 | - | - | UV, HTREM,XRD | pseudospherical | 14 | [ | |
| 25 | Leaf | 550 | - | - | UV,TEM | Irregular | 50–70 | [ | |
| 26 | - | 550 | - | - | TEM,EDX | Spherical | 20–35 | [ | |
| 27 | - | 540 | 3303 | O–H | HRTEM, FTIR, UV, EDX | Spherical | 16–91 | [ | |
| 2121 | C–N | ||||||||
| 1637 | C=O | ||||||||
| 28 | 529 | 3529–3232 | O–H | FTIR, UV,TEM,XRD | Spherical | 18 | [ | ||
| 1628 | C=O | ||||||||
Applications of AuNPs synthesized from plants extracts.
| S/N | Plants name | Plants part | Salt/precursor | Applications | Activities | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leaf | HAuCl4 | luminescence properties | The obtained nanoparticles exhibit good multiphoton-excited luminescence properties. | [ | |
| 2 | Leaf | HAuCl4 | radical scavenging and catalytic activities | The obtained AuNPs exhibited antioxidant activity against DPPH and ABTS radicals, and catalytic activity in degradation of 4-nitrophenol pollutant | [ | |
| 3 | Peel | AuCl3 | Water Purification | It exhibit suitable activity for water purification. | [ | |
| 4 | Bark | HAuCl4 | Cytotoxicity | It enhance the toxicity towards CTX TNA2 cells than free zonisamide. | [ | |
| 5 | Fruit | HAuCl4 | Anti-allergic rhinitis effect | The biosynthesized AuNPs considerably inhibit the allergic inflammation in mice models and could function as anti-allergic rhinitis agents | [ | |
| 6 | Whole plant | HAuCl4 | Cytoxicity activities | The synthesized AuNPs effectively inhibit the growth of human colon adenocarcinoma (HT-29) cells, | [ | |
| 7 | Peel | HAuCl4 | cytotoxicity | the cytotoxicity of the gold nanoparticles against skin cancer A431 cell lines | [ | |
| 8 | bark | HAuCl4 | Environmental pollution | AuNPs demostrared an eco-friendly reduction conditions | [ | |
| 9 | - | HAuCl4 | Antibacterial Activity | The Au-NPs showed great potential in inhibiting the activities of | [ | |
| 10 | Leaf | HAuCl4 | Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities | It shows significance | [ | |
| 11 | Bark | HAuCl4 | cytotoxicity | NAC - Au NPs showed no tocity against fibroblast cells | [ | |
| 12 | - | HAuCl4 | antioxidant, anti-cancer and antibacterial activities | Hd-AuNPs exhibit commendable antioxidant, anti-cancer and antibacterial activities | [ | |
| 13 | Pulp | HAuCl4 | Catalytic activity. | The GNPs synthesized showed potential catalytic activity. | [ | |
| 14 | Leaves, wing | HAuCl4 | enzyme activity | It enhanced the enzyme activity on α-amylase, cellulase, and xylanase | [ | |
| 15 | Leaf | HAuCl3.H2O | biodegradation | It shows promising photocatalytic degradation of cationic dye | [ | |
| 16 | Leaf | HAuCl3.H2O | biodegradation | The synthesized AuNPs in the presence of sunlight catalyzed the degradation of the Methyl Orange and Rhodamine B with percent degradation of 83.25% and 87.64% respectively | [ |
DPPH = 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl-hydrate, ABTS = 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid), HAuCl4 = gold(iii)chloride hydrate, HAuCl4 = Chloroauric acid.
Figure 1Mechanism of AuNPs synthesis using Plant extracts.
Figure 2Schematic representation of degradation of some dyes using the AuNPs.
Figure 3Schematic representation of the anticancer activity of AuNPs.
Figure 4Schematic representation of the antioxidant activity of AuNPs.
Figure 5Schematic representation of the antibacterial mechanism of AuNPs.