OBJECTIVES: To evaluate image quality of protocol including 135 kVp, 5 mAs and 80 kVp, 5 mAs in the paranasal sinus CT examinations using single volumetric 320-row multidetector CT technique. METHODS: From September to December 2016, both of our control group including 135 kVp and 5 mAs and our study group including 80 kVp and 5 mAs paranasal CT protocols were simultaneously performed on 40 patients using single volumetric 320-row multidetector CT device. Image quality for bony structures, air-filled structures and soft tissues were independently assessed for each group by three blinded observers using a 3-point grading scale (0 = not diagnostic, 1 = partially diagnostic, 2 = diagnostic). Objective image quality was also performed by region of interests were placed on axial soft tissue reconstructions in both eye bulbs, retrobulbar fat and maxillary sinuses to obtain different values for aqueous tissue, soft tissue and air, respectively. Effective dose was calculated from the dose-length product. RESULTS: The effective radiation dose which calculated for the control group scans was 0.037 ± 0.003 mSv. But, it was 0.0099 ± 0.001 mSv for the study group scans. The effective radiation dose of study group was statistically significant lower than control group (p < 0.001). Despite significant lowering of the radiation doses, image qualities were sufficient for evaluating all the bony structures, air-filled structures and soft tissues except for eye muscle, retrobulbar fat and eye bulb. CONCLUSIONS: Our results present that our protocols for study and control group provide significant dose reduction without the loss of diagnostic image quality for paranasal sinus CT. Paranasal sinus CT imaging can be performed at very low radiation exposure maintaining high image quality using a single volume 320-row detector CT device using 135 kVp and 5 mAs.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate image quality of protocol including 135 kVp, 5 mAs and 80 kVp, 5 mAs in the paranasal sinus CT examinations using single volumetric 320-row multidetector CT technique. METHODS: From September to December 2016, both of our control group including 135 kVp and 5 mAs and our study group including 80 kVp and 5 mAs paranasal CT protocols were simultaneously performed on 40 patients using single volumetric 320-row multidetector CT device. Image quality for bony structures, air-filled structures and soft tissues were independently assessed for each group by three blinded observers using a 3-point grading scale (0 = not diagnostic, 1 = partially diagnostic, 2 = diagnostic). Objective image quality was also performed by region of interests were placed on axial soft tissue reconstructions in both eye bulbs, retrobulbar fat and maxillary sinuses to obtain different values for aqueous tissue, soft tissue and air, respectively. Effective dose was calculated from the dose-length product. RESULTS: The effective radiation dose which calculated for the control group scans was 0.037 ± 0.003 mSv. But, it was 0.0099 ± 0.001 mSv for the study group scans. The effective radiation dose of study group was statistically significant lower than control group (p < 0.001). Despite significant lowering of the radiation doses, image qualities were sufficient for evaluating all the bony structures, air-filled structures and soft tissues except for eye muscle, retrobulbar fat and eye bulb. CONCLUSIONS: Our results present that our protocols for study and control group provide significant dose reduction without the loss of diagnostic image quality for paranasal sinus CT. Paranasal sinus CT imaging can be performed at very low radiation exposure maintaining high image quality using a single volume 320-row detector CT device using 135 kVp and 5 mAs.
Authors: Daniel J Podberesky; Erin Angel; Terry T Yoshizumi; Greta Toncheva; Shelia R Salisbury; Alan S Brody; Christopher Alsip; Alessandra Barelli; John C Egelhoff; Colin Anderson-Evans; Giao B Nguyen; David Dow; Donald P Frush Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Denis Tack; Jacques Widelec; Viviane De Maertelaer; Jean-Marie Bailly; Christian Delcour; Pierre Alain Gevenois Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 3.959