| Literature DB >> 28936200 |
Xiaoning Li1,2, Shijuan Han1,2, Guangyang Wang1,2, Xiaoying Liu1,2, Erick Amombo1,2, Yan Xie1, Jinmin Fu1,3.
Abstract
Perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) is an important forage grass with high yield and superior quality in temperate regions which is widely used in parks, sport field, and other places. However, perennial ryegrass is moderately tolerant to salinity stress compared to other commercial cultivars and salt stress reduces their growth and productivity. Aspergillus aculeatus has been documented to participate in alleviating damage induced by salinity. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the mechanisms underlying A. aculeatus-mediated salt tolerance, and forage quality of perennial ryegrass exposed to 0, 200, and 400 mM NaCl concentrations. Physiological markers and forage quality of perennial ryegrass to salt stress were evaluated based on the growth rate, photosynthesis, antioxidant enzymes activity, lipid peroxidation, ionic homeostasis, the nutritional value of forage, and metabolites. Plants inoculated with A. aculeatus exhibited higher relative growth rate (RGR), turf and forage quality under salt stress than un-inoculated plants. Moreover, in inoculated plants, the fungus remarkably improved plant photosynthetic efficiency, reduced the antioxidant enzymes activity (POD and CAT), and attenuated lipid peroxidation (decreased H2O2 and MDA accumulation) induced by salinity, compared to un-inoculated plants. Furthermore, the fungus also acts as an important role in maintaining the lower Na/K ratio and metabolites and lower the amino acids (Alanine, Proline, GABA, and Asparagine), and soluble sugars (Glucose and Fructose) for inoculated plants than un-inoculated ones. Our results suggest that A. aculeatus may be involved in modulating perennial ryegrass tolerance to salinity in various ways.Entities:
Keywords: Aspergillus aculeatus; forage quality; metabolites; perennial ryegrass; physiological markers; salt stress
Year: 2017 PMID: 28936200 PMCID: PMC5595160 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01664
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Photosynthetic parameters deduced by the JIP-test analysis of fluorescence transients in Figure 4.
| F0 = 20 μs | 0.38a | 0.38a | 0.34a | 0.36a | 0.36a | 0.32a | Fluorescence at time t after onset of actinic illumination |
| FK | 0.90a | 0.90a | 0.80a | 0.82ab | 0.79a | 0.76b | Fluorescence value at 300 μs |
| FJ | 1.04a | 1.06a | 0.97a | 0.98b | 0.90a | 0.93b | Fluorescence value at the J-step of OJIP |
| FI | 1.41a | 1.41a | 1.31a | 1.34ab* | 1.26a | 1.31b | Fluorescence value at the I-step of OJIP |
| FP = FM | 1.52a | 1.58a | 1.43ab | 1.47b* | 1.38b | 1.43b* | Fluorescence value at the peak of OJIP test |
| VJ | 0.58a | 0.57a | 0.58a | 0.56a | 0.55a | 0.55a | Relative variable fluorescence at the J-step |
| VI | 0.90a | 0.86b | 0.88a | 0.88a | 0.92a | 0.90a* | Relative variable fluorescence at the I-step |
| Mo | 1.80a | 1.75a | 1.67a | 1.66a | 1.75a | 1.59a | Approximate value of the initial slope of fluorescence transient curves |
| φPo | 0.75a | 0.76a | 0.76a | 0.76a | 0.73a | 0.77a* | Maximum quantum yield for primary photochemistry, namely FV /FM |
| φEo | 0.32a | 0.33a | 0.32a | 0.34a | 0.33a | 0.34a* | Quantum yield of the electron transport flux from QA to QB |
| φRo | 0.07a | 0.11a | 0.09a | 0.09b | 0.06a | 0.08b* | Quantum yield for reduction of end electron acceptors at the PSI acceptor side |
| ΨEo | 0.42a | 0.43a | 0.42a | 0.44a | 0.45a | 0.45a | Efficiency/probability with which a PSII trapped electron is transferred from QA to QB |
| δRo | 0.22a | 0.33a | 0.27a | 0.26b | 0.18a | 0.23c* | Efficiency/probability with which an electron from QB is transferred until PSI acceptors |
| ABS/RC | 0.78a | 0.76a | 0.73bc | 0.70b | 0.71c | 0.68b | Absorbed photon flux per RC |
| γRC2 | 0.20a | 0.20a | 0.21a | 0.20a | 0.19a | 0.21a* | Probability that a PSII Chl molecule functions as RC |
| RC/ABS | 1.31a | 1.32b | 1.37a | 1.43ab | 1.42a | 1.47a | Number of QA reducing RCs per PSII antenna Chl |
| TP0/RC | 3.09a | 3.07a | 2.90a | 2.98a | 3.18a | 2.86a | Trapped excitation flux (leading to QA reduction) per RC |
| ET0/RC | 1.34b | 1.35a | 1.23b | 1.31a | 1.43a | 1.27a* | Electron transport flux (further than |
| RE0/RC | 0.29a | 0.43a | 0.34a | 0.35b | 0.25a | 0.30c* | Electron flux reducing end electron acceptors at the PSI acceptor side, per RC |
| PIABS | 0.57a | 0.60a | 0.62a | 0.63a | 0.53a | 0.75a* | PI (potential) for energy conservation from exciton to the reduction of intersystem electron |
| PItotal | 0.18a | 0.30a | 0.23a | 0.23a | 0.12a | 0.23a* | PI(potential) for energy conservation from exciton to the reduction of PSI end acceptors |
F represents A. aculeatus. The NaCl concentration is 0, 200, and 400 mM and the numbers marked with the same small letter indicate insignificant differences under only salt treatment or NaCl + A. aculeatus treatment with the different salt concentrations (P < 0.05). The asterisk indicate significant differences under salt treatment and NaCl + A. aculeatus treatment with the same salt concentrations (P < 0.05).
Figure 4Alterations of chlorophyll fluorescence transients (OJIP curve) in leaves of perennial ryegrass grown with or without A. aculeatus under 0, 200, 400 mM NaCl stress.
Figure 1Influences of the A. aculeatus on relative growth rate of perennial ryegrass root (A) and shoot (B) under salt stress. Columns marked with same small letter indicate insignificant differences under only NaCl treatment or NaCl + A. aculeatus treatment with the different salt concentrations (P < 0.05). Columns marked with asterisk indicate significant differences under NaCl treatment and NaCl + A. aculeatus treatment with the same salt concentrations (P < 0.05).
Figure 2Electrolyte leakage (EL) (A), malondialdehyde (MDA) (B), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (C) accumulation in leaves of perennial ryegrass under salt stress. Columns marked with same small letter indicate insignificant differences under only NaCl treatment or NaCl + A. aculeatus treatment with the different salt concentrations (P < 0.05). Columns marked with asterisk indicate significant differences under NaCl treatment and NaCl + A. aculeatus treatment with the same salt concentrations (P < 0.05).
Figure 3Peroxidase (POD) (A) and catalase (CAT) (B) content in leaves of perennial ryegrass exposed to salt stress. Columns marked with same small letter indicate insignificant differences under only NaCl treatment or NaCl + A. aculeatus treatment with the different salt concentrations (P < 0.05). Columns marked with asterisk indicate significant differences under NaCl treatment and NaCl + A. aculeatus treatment with the same salt concentrations (P < 0.05).
Figure 5Influences of the A. aculeatus on Na+ concentration (A), K+ concentration (B), and Na+/ K+ ratio (C) under salt stress. Columns marked with same small letter indicate insignificant differences under only NaCl treatment or NaCl + A. aculeatus treatment with the different salt concentrations (P < 0.05). Columns marked with asterisk indicate significant differences under NaCl treatment and NaCl + A. aculeatus treatment with the same salt concentrations (P < 0.05).
Influence of the Aspergillus aculeatus on forage quality of perennial ryegrass exposed to 0, 200, and 400 mM NaCl concentration.
| CP | 18.64 ± 1.15a | 21.96 ± 0.09a* | 18.62 ± 0.23a | 22.01 ± 0.49a* | 18.31 ± 0.33a | 19.96 ± 0.62b* |
| CF | 9.83 ± 0.20a | 11.95 ± 0.69a* | 9.97 ± 0.53a | 10.37 ± 0.85b | 8.80 ± 0.57b | 9.72 ± 0.28b |
| P | 0.40 ± 0.01a | 0.54 ± 0.02a* | 0.35 ± 0.01b | 0.47 ± 0.01b* | 0.31 ± 0.01c | 0.40 ± 0.01c* |
| NDF | 50.79 ± 0.89a | 51.02 ± 0.34a | 45.72 ± 0.92b | 42.98 ± 1.06b | 43.88 ± 1.39b | 41.88 ± 2.96b |
| ADF | 26.89 ± 1.14a | 25.57 ± 0.91a | 23.32 ± 0.53b | 21.98 ± 0.71b | 23.04 ± 0.19b | 21.34 ± 0.50b |
F represents A. aculeatus. NaCl concentration is 0, 200, and 400 mM and the results shown are the mean ± SD. The CP, CF, P, NDF, and ADF, respectively, represented the content of crude protein, crude fat, phosphorus, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent fiber. The numbers marked with the same small letter indicate no significant differences for comparison of treatments based on SNK test (P < 0.05). The asterisk indicate significant differences under salt treatment and NaCl + A. aculeatus treatment with the same salt concentrations (P < 0.05).
Influence of the Aspergillus aculeatus on metabolites in leaf of perennial ryegrass exposed to 400 mM NaCl concentration.
| Alanine | 0.19 ± 0.032b | 0.15 ± 0.013b | 0.33 ± 0.054a | 0.22 ± 0.088b |
| Valine | 0.09 ± 0.017b | 0.08 ± 0.008b | 0.20 ± 0.032a | 0.15 ± 0.051ab |
| Serine | 0.35 ± 0.066a | 0.30 ± 0.068a | 0.47 ± 0.096a | 0.35 ± 0.044a |
| Threonine | 0.15 ± 0.018a | 0.11 ± 0.022a | 0.22 ± 0.030a | 0.17 ± 0.037a |
| Proline | 0.53 ± 0.011b | 0.42 ± 0.088b | 3.92 ± 0.809a | 1.93 ± 0.476b |
| GABA | 0.03 ± 0.014c | 0.03 ± 0.005c | 0.13 ± 0.012a | 0.08 ± 0.037b |
| Glutamic acid | 0.14 ± 0.008a | 0.09 ± 0.027b | 0.08 ± 0.025b | 0.07 ± 0.008b |
| Asparagine | 0.10 ± 0.011b | 0.05 ± 0.021b | 0.17 ± 0.069a | 0.05 ± 0.044b |
| Tyrosine | 0.03 ± 0.014a | 0.03 ± 0.013a | 0.02 ± 0.003a | 0.02 ± 0.003a |
| Tryptophan | 0.01 ± 0.000b | 0.01 ± 0.000b | 0.04 ± 0.013a | 0.04 ± 0.014a |
| Ethanolamine | 0.05 ± 0.006a | 0.04 ± 0.014a | 0.12 ± 0.044a | 0.09 ± 0.031a |
| Isoleucine | 0.05 ± 0.009a | 0.04 ± 0.010a | UD | UD |
| Succinic acid | 0.05 ± 0.008a | 0.03 ± 0.008a | 0.06 ± 0.018a | 0.05 ± 0.012a |
| Glyceric acid | 0.03 ± 0.006b | 0.02 ± 0.006ab | 0.05 ± 0.006a | 0.05 ± 0.014a |
| Fumaric acid | 0.03 ± 0.008a | 0.01 ± 0.001ab | 0.02 ± 0.003ab | 0.01 ± 0.005b |
| Malic acid | 3.20 ± 0.445a | 2.16 ± 0.132b | 1.81 ± 0.277b | 1.78 ± 0.054b |
| Trihydroxybutyric acid | 0.02 ± 0.008b | 0.02 ± 0.003b | 0.05 ± 0.009a | 0.05 ± 0.005a |
| Phthalic acid | 0.02 ± 0.007a | 0.01 ± 0.000a | 0.01 ± 0.003a | 0.01 ± 0.005a |
| Carboxylic acid | 0.67 ± 0.255a | 0.77 ± 0.185a | 1.20 ± 0.357a | 0.72 ± 0.105a |
| Citric acid | 1.06 ± 0.075a | 1.11 ± 0.124a | UD | UD |
| Glucuronic acid | 0.01 ± 0.006a | 0.01 ± 0.000a | 0.03 ± 0.012a | 0.02 ± 0.004a |
| Sorbose | 0.18 ± 0.000a | 0.16 ± 0.090a | 0.03 ± 0.003b | 0.02 ± 0.004b |
| Psicose | 0.36 ± 0.000a | UD | 0.02 ± 0.005b | 0.02 ±0.005b |
| Galactose | 0.06 ± 0.011b | 0.02 ± 0.010b | 0.17 ± 0.030a | 0.12 ± 0.053a |
| Glucose | 0.74 ± 0.250c | 0.16 ± 0.059d | 2.09 ± 0.149a | 1.68 ± 0.170b |
| Mannose | 0.14 ± 0.048c | 0.03 ± 0.014d | 0.45 ± 0.039a | 0.33 ± 0.051b |
| Fructose | 0.77 ± 0.486b | 0.24 ± 0.152b | 2.33 ± 0.241a | 2.00 ± 0.282a |
| Mannopyranose | 0.01 ± 0.002b | 0.01 ± 0.000b | 0.02 ± 0.005b | 0.03 ± 0.009a |
| Glucopyranose | 0.01 ± 0.001b | UD | 0.06 ± 0.031a | UD |
| Sucrose | 3.74 ± 0.625b | 2.85 ± 0.644b | 13.93 ± 2.607a | 12.44 ± 1.910a |
| Galactinol | 0.02 ± 0.004a | 0.04 ± 0.020a | 0.05 ± 0.018a | 0.05 ± 0.019a |
| Galactopyranose | UD | 0.02 ± 0.007a | 0.02 ± 0.002a | 0.02 ± 0.010a |
| Octadecanoic acid | 0.10 ± 0.028a | 0.08 ± 0.043a | 0.09 ± 0.029a | 0.08 ± 0.009a |
| Hexadecanoic acid | 0.15 ± 0.030a | 0.10 ± 0.047a | 0.12 ± 0.029a | 0.17 ± 0.012a |
| Glycerol | 0.56 ± 0.108a | 0.41 ± 0.147a | 0.58 ± 0.138a | 0.61 ± 0.092a |
| Myo-Inositol | 0.30 ± 0.036a | 0.30 ± 0.091a | 0.31 ± 0.067a | 0.26 ± 0.011a |
| Glyceryl-glycoside | 0.02 ± 0.011a | 0.02 ± 0.003a | 0.03 ± 0.008a | 0.02 ± 0.001a |
| Pentasiloxane | 0.03 ± 0.008a | 0.04 ± 0.008a | 0.02 ± 0.003a | 0.03 ± 0.014a |
| Phosphate | 0.02 ± 0.004a | 0.04 ± 0.000a | 0.05 ± 0.025a | 0.03 ± 0.008a |
| Silanol | 0.33 ± 0.080b | 0.32 ± 0.029b | 0.74 ± 0.086a | 0.25 ± 0.079b |
F represents A. aculeatus. NaCl concentration is 0 and 400 mM and the results shown are the mean ± SD. The numbers marked with the same small letter indicate no significant differences for comparison of treatments based on SNK test (P < 0.05). UD, undeterminable.
Figure 6Hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) (A) and principle component analysis (PCA) (B) of metabolites in leaves of perennial ryegrass (salt concentration is 0 and 400 mM). F represents A. aculeatus treatment.