Literature DB >> 28933895

Individual variability in the semantic processing of English compound words.

Daniel Schmidtke1, Julie A Van Dyke2, Victor Kuperman1.   

Abstract

Semantic transparency effects during compound word recognition provide critical insight into the organization of semantic knowledge and the nature of semantic processing. The past 25 years of psycholinguistic research on compound semantic transparency has produced discrepant effects, leaving the existence and nature of its influence unresolved. In the present study, we examined the influence of semantic transparency and individual reading experience on eye-movement behavior during sentence reading. Eye-movement data were collected from 138 non-college-bound 16- to 26-year-old speakers of English in a sentence-reading task representing a total of 455 different compound words. Measures of individual differences in reading experience were collected from the same participants and consisted of standardized assessments of exposure to printed materials, vocabulary size, and word recognition skill. Statistical analyses revealed facilitatory effects of both Modifier-Compound and Head-Compound transparency throughout the eye-movement record. Moreover, the study reports interactions between Head-Compound transparency and measures of reading experience. Readers with a small amount exposure to printed materials and a limited vocabulary size exhibited slower processing in late eye-movement measures when reading highly transparent compounds relative to opaque compounds. The opposite effect was observed for readers with a relatively large amount of exposure to printed materials and a relatively larger vocabulary size, such that highly transparent compounds facilitated lexical processing. To account for the results, the authors posit a trade-off between 2 cognitive mechanisms, which is modulated by individual reading experience; that is, the benefit of semantic coactivation of closely related concepts, and the cost of discriminating between those concepts. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28933895      PMCID: PMC5862730          DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  40 in total

1.  Saccadic eye movements and cognition.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Attractor dynamics and semantic neighborhood density: processing is slowed by near neighbors and speeded by distant neighbors.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; James S Magnuson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English.

Authors:  Marc Brysbaert; Boris New
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

4.  An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning.

Authors:  R Harald Baayen; Petar Milin; Dusica Filipović Đurđević; Peter Hendrix; Marco Marelli
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Experience with compound words influences their processing: An eye movement investigation with English compound words.

Authors:  Barbara J Juhasz
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Meaning is in the beholder's eye: morpho-semantic effects in masked priming.

Authors:  Marco Marelli; Simona Amenta; Elena Angela Morone; Davide Crepaldi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06

7.  The nature of compounds: a psychocentric perspective.

Authors:  Gary Libben
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm.

Authors:  Falk Huettig; Gerry T M Altmann
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004-12-23

9.  New and updated tests of print exposure and reading abilities in college students.

Authors:  Danie Jl Aacheson; Justine B Wellu; Maryellen C MacDonald
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2008-02

10.  Accentuate the positive: semantic access in english compounds.

Authors:  Victor Kuperman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-04-24
View more
  7 in total

1.  Language experience shapes relational knowledge of compound words.

Authors:  Daniel Schmidtke; Christina L Gagné; Victor Kuperman; Thomas L Spalding
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

2.  Conceptual relations compete during auditory and visual compound word recognition.

Authors:  Daniel Schmidtke; Christina L Gagné; Victor Kuperman; Thomas L Spalding; Benjamin V Tucker
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.331

3.  Psycholinguistic norms for a set of 506 French compound words.

Authors:  Patrick Bonin; Betty Laroche; Alain Méot
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-07-08

4.  Testing the validity of a self-report scale, author recognition test, and book counting as measures of lifetime exposure to print fiction.

Authors:  Lena Wimmer; Heather J Ferguson
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-03-11

5.  LADEC: The Large Database of English Compounds.

Authors:  Christina L Gagné; Thomas L Spalding; Daniel Schmidtke
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2019-10

6.  An eye-tracking study of reading long and short novel and lexicalized compound words.

Authors:  Jukka Hyönä; Alexander Pollatsek; Minna Koski; Henri Olkoniemi
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 0.957

7.  Parafoveal processing of orthographic, morphological, and semantic information during reading Arabic: A boundary paradigm investigation.

Authors:  Ehab W Hermena; Eida J Juma; Maryam AlJassmi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.