Literature DB >> 30238020

Conceptual relations compete during auditory and visual compound word recognition.

Daniel Schmidtke1, Christina L Gagné1, Victor Kuperman2, Thomas L Spalding1, Benjamin V Tucker1.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown that compound word recognition involves selecting a relational meaning (e.g., 'box for letters' for letterbox) out of a set of competing relational meanings for the same compound. We conducted five experiments to investigate the role of competition between relational meanings across visual and auditory compound word processing. In Experiment 1 conceptual relations judgments were collected for 604 English compound words. From this database we computed an information-theoretic measure of competition between conceptual relations - entropy of conceptual relations. Experiments 2 and 3 report that greater entropy (i.e., increased competition) among a set of conceptual relations leads to longer latencies for compounds in auditory lexical decision. Experiments 4 and 5 demonstrate the same result in two visual lexical decision studies. These findings provide evidence that relational meanings are constructed and evaluated during compound recognition, regardless of whether compounds are recognized via auditory or visual input.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30238020      PMCID: PMC6141212          DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2018.1437192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 2327-3798            Impact factor:   2.331


  21 in total

1.  Lexical and relational influences on the processing of novel compounds.

Authors:  Christina L Gagné
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2002 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Putting the bits together: an information theoretical perspective on morphological processing.

Authors:  Fermín Moscoso del Prado Martín; Aleksandar Kostić; R Harald Baayen
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004-11

3.  Wuggy: a multilingual pseudoword generator.

Authors:  Emmanuel Keuleers; Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2010-08

4.  Electrophysiological evidence for incremental lexical-semantic integration in auditory compound comprehension.

Authors:  Dirk Koester; Henning Holle; Thomas C Gunter
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English.

Authors:  Marc Brysbaert; Boris New
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

6.  Relation priming in established compounds: facilitation?

Authors:  Thomas L Spalding; Christina L Gagné
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-11

7.  Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition.

Authors:  W D Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-03

8.  The structure of the initial cohort: evidence from gating.

Authors:  L K Tyler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-11

9.  The English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  David A Balota; Melvin J Yap; Michael J Cortese; Keith A Hutchison; Brett Kessler; Bjorn Loftis; James H Neely; Douglas L Nelson; Greg B Simpson; Rebecca Treiman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-08

10.  The British Lexicon Project: lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words.

Authors:  Emmanuel Keuleers; Paula Lacey; Kathleen Rastle; Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2012-03
View more
  3 in total

1.  Language experience shapes relational knowledge of compound words.

Authors:  Daniel Schmidtke; Christina L Gagné; Victor Kuperman; Thomas L Spalding
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

2.  Psycholinguistic norms for a set of 506 French compound words.

Authors:  Patrick Bonin; Betty Laroche; Alain Méot
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-07-08

3.  An eye-tracking study of reading long and short novel and lexicalized compound words.

Authors:  Jukka Hyönä; Alexander Pollatsek; Minna Koski; Henri Olkoniemi
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 0.957

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.