| Literature DB >> 28930201 |
Lauve Rachel Tchokouaha Yamthe1,2, Patrick Valere Tsouh Fokou3, Cedric Derick Jiatsa Mbouna4, Rodrigue Keumoe5, Bruno Lenta Ndjakou6, Paul Toukam Djouonzo7,8, Alvine Ngoutane Mfopa9, Jennifer Legac10, Nole Tsabang11, Jiri Gut12, Philip J Rosenthal13, Fabrice Fekam Boyom14.
Abstract
The aim of this work was to screen extracts from Annona muricata and Annona reticulata in vitro against Plasmodium falciparum. Crude ethanolic extracts, methylene chloride fractions, aqueous fractions, subfractions and isolated compounds (stigmasterol-3-O-β-d-glucopyranoside, lichexanthone, gallic acid and β-sitosterol-3-O-β-d-glucopyranoside) were tested for cytotoxicity on erythrocytes and Human Foreskin Fibroblasts cells and against the W2 strain of P. falciparum in culture. Results indicated that none of the extracts was cytotoxic at concentrations up to 10 µg/mL. Most of the extracts, fractions and subfractions inhibited the growth of P. falciparum with IC50 values ranging from 0.07 to 3.46 µg/mL. The most potent was the subfraction 30 from A. muricata stem bark (IC50 = 0.07 µg/mL) with a selectivity index of ˃ 142. Subfraction 3 from A. muricata root also exhibited very good activity (IC50 = 0.09 µg/mL) with a high selectivity index (SI ˃ 111). Amongst the isolated compounds, only gallic acid showed activity with IC50 of 3.32 µg/mL and SI > 10. These results support traditional claims for A. muricata and A. reticulata in the treatment of malaria. Given their limited cytotoxicity profile, their extracts qualify as promising starting points for antimalarial drug discovery.Entities:
Keywords: Annona muricata; Annona reticulata; Plasmodium falciparum; antiplasmodial activity; cytotoxicity
Year: 2015 PMID: 28930201 PMCID: PMC5533161 DOI: 10.3390/medicines2020055
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicines (Basel) ISSN: 2305-6320
Susceptibility of human foreskin fibroblast (HFF) and P. falciparum to plant extracts.
| Plant Species | Organ | Nature of Extract | Code | a Yield (%) | b IC50 (µg/mL) ± S.D. | c SI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pericarp | Crude ethanol extract | AMpEthOH | 5.68 | 1.01 ± 0.07 | ˃9.90 | |
| H2O fraction | AMpH2O | 1.02 | >10 | ND | ||
| CH2Cl2 fraction | AMpCH2Cl2 | 3.54 | 0.94 ± 0.03 | ˃10.63 | ||
| Root | Crude ethanolic extract | AMrEthOH | 6.23 | 0.79 ± 0.14 | ˃12.65 | |
| H2O fraction | AMrH2O | 0.98 | >10 | ND | ||
| CH2Cl2 fraction | AMrCH2Cl2 | 4.18 | 0.19 ± 0.03 | ˃52.63 | ||
| Subfractions | AMrSF1 | 0.56 | 0.61 ± 0.04 | ˃16.39 | ||
| AMr SF2 | 0.33 | 0.22 ± 0.06 | ˃45.45 | |||
| AMrSF3 | 1.07 | 0.09 ± 0.003 | ˃111.11 | |||
| Purified compound | Stigmasterol-3- | 0.016 | ˃10 | ND | ||
| Stem bark | Crude ethanolic extract | AMsb-EthOH | 5.91 | 1.45 ± 0.20 | ˃6.45 | |
| H2O fraction | AMsbH2O | 0.87 | >10 | ND | ||
| CH2Cl2 fraction | AMsbCH2Cl2 | 4.32 | 1.50 ± 0.07 | ˃6.66 | ||
| Subfractions | AMsbSF2 | 0.11 | 1.65 ± 1.58 | ˃6.06 | ||
| AMsbSF15 | 0.08 | 2.52 ± 1.41 | ˃3.96 | |||
| AMsbSF16 | 0.16 | 3.46 ± 0.98 | ˃2.89 | |||
| AMsbSF17 | 0.04 | 2.45 ± 1.77 | ˃3.92 | |||
| AMsbSF18 | 0.02 | 2.75 ± 1.86 | ˃3.63 | |||
| AMsbSF19 | 0.73 | 2.89 ± 0.55 | ˃3.46 | |||
| AMsbSF20 | 0.03 | 1.14 ± 0.22 | ˃8.77 | |||
| AMsbSF21 | 0.03 | 1.11 ± 0.34 | ˃9.00 | |||
| AMsbSF22 | 0.02 | 0.12 ± 0.03 | ˃83.3 | |||
| AMsbSF24 | 0.41 | 0.46 ± 0.04 | ˃21.7 | |||
| AMsbSF27 | 0.02 | 1.17 ± 0.16 | ˃8.54 | |||
| AMsbSF28 | 0.62 | 0.72 ± 0.07 | ˃13.88 | |||
| AMsbSF29 | 0.07 | 0.75 ± 0.13 | ˃13.33 | |||
| AMsbSF30 | 0.31 | 0.07 ± 0.009 | ˃142.3 | |||
| AMsbSF31 | 0.19 | 0.28 ± 0.05 | ˃35.7 | |||
| AMsbSF32 | 0.017 | 0.78 ± 0.43 | ˃12.8 | |||
| AMsbSF33 | 0.05 | 1.31 ± 0.19 | ˃7.63 | |||
| AMsbSF34 | 0.09 | 1.07 ± 0.36 | ˃9.34 | |||
| AMsbSF35 | 0.019 | 2.19 ± 0.47 | ˃4.56 | |||
| AMsbSF36 | 0.22 | 1.39 ± 0.33 | ˃7.19 | |||
| Purified compounds | Lichexanthone (AMsbP1) | 0.014 | ˃10 | ND | ||
| Gallic acid (AMsbP2) | 0.052 | 3.32 ± 1.49 | ˃3.01 | |||
| β-Sitosterol-3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (AMsbP3) | 0.012 | ˃10 | ND | |||
| Leaf | Crude ethanolic extract | ARlEthOH | 10.46 | ˃ 10 | ND | |
| H2O fraction | ARlH2O | 1.71 | >10 | ND | ||
| CH2Cl2 fractions | ARlCH2Cl2 | 9.93 | ˃ 10 | ND | ||
| Twig | Crude ethanolic extract | ARtwEthOH | 4.96 | ˃ 10 | ND | |
| H2O fraction | ARtwH2O | 0.53 | >10 | ND | ||
| CH2Cl2 fraction | ARtwCH2Cl2 | 1.78 | 0.88 ± 0.34 | ˃11.4 | ||
| Stem bark | Crude ethanolic extract | ARsbEthOH | 6.02 | 0.29 ± 0.02 | ˃34.5 | |
| H2O fraction | ARsbH2O | 1.04 | >10 | ND | ||
| CH2Cl2 fraction | ARsbCH2Cl2 | 3.71 | 0.82 ± 0.25 | ˃12.2 | ||
| Root | Crude ethanolic extract | ARrEthOH | 5.12 | 1.90 ± 0.008 | ˃5.26 | |
| H2O fraction | ARrH2O | 0.71 | >10 | ND | ||
| CH2Cl2 fraction | ARrCH2Cl2 | 4.54 | 0.38 ± 0.23 | ˃26.3 | ||
| Fruit | Crude ethanolic extract | ARfrEthOH | 5.14 | 0.67 ± 0.02 | ˃14.9 | |
| H2O fraction | ARfrH2O | 0.48 | >10 | ND | ||
| CH2Cl2 fraction | ARfrCH2Cl2 | 2.12 | 0.42 ± 0.009 | ˃23.8 | ||
| Positive control | Artemisinin | 0.005 ± 0.0008 | ND |
a The percent extraction yields were calculated in percentages (w/w); The susceptibility of HFF cells to plant samples was evaluated in culture; b The susceptibility of the W2 strain of P. falciparum to plant extracts was evaluated in culture; c SI = Selectivity index; AM = Annona muricata; AR = Annona reticulata; CC50 = concentration of extract that killed 50% of HFF cells, relative to negative control;IC50 = concentration of extract that killed 50% of parasites, relative to negative control; S.D. = standard deviation; ND = not determined.
Figure 1Chemical structures of compounds isolated from A. muricata.