| Literature DB >> 28929364 |
Anna Rethy1,2, Jørn Ove Sæternes3, Jostein Halgunset3, Ronald Mårvik2,4, Erlend F Hofstad2,5, Juan A Sánchez-Margallo5,6, Thomas Langø7,8.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to develop a multimodal, permanent liver phantom displaying functional vasculature and common pathologies, for teaching, training and equipment development in laparoscopic ultrasound and navigation.Entities:
Keywords: Blood flow; Laparoscopic liver surgery; Liver phantom; Navigation; Ultrasound
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28929364 PMCID: PMC5754383 DOI: 10.1007/s11548-017-1669-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg ISSN: 1861-6410 Impact factor: 2.924
Fig. 1Development of the mold from an anatomic liver specimen
Fig. 2Paraffin casts of the two parts of the liver vascular tree
Fig. 3Layer 2 casting picture displays: the two vascular tree casts of the portal and the cava system with corresponding ends connected the gallbladder with the bile ducts and two tumors of different sizes
Fig. 4ANJO liver phantom showing the colored depressions (left picture), 1.5 mm deep and wide, which serve as positional markers for navigation. The EM tracking sensor incorporated inside the parenchyma 5 mm below the surface is shown in the right picture
Fig. 5CT (top) and MR (bottom) images of the phantom showing cross section of vessels and metastatic tumors. Hepatocellular carcinoma visible on MR picture. Bright marks on MR image are due to remnants of wax
Fig. 6Ultrasound images of the phantom. Left: metastatic tumor model. Right: color Doppler ultrasound of vessels with circulating fluid
Fig. 7Ultrasound image of a benign cyst model (left) and vessel (right) with flow. Hepatocellular carcinoma tumor model surrounds both hollow structures
Fig. 8Ultrasound showing a vessel bifurcation with infiltrating hepatocellular carcinoma tissue
Fig. 9The experimental setup with the phantom connected to a flow system. The sensor is attached using a medical grade elastic shrinking tube (Olympus, Germany)
Fig. 10Laparoscopic ultrasound probe (left) and EM tracking sensor (right)
Fig. 11The navigation scene from CustusX. Left: 3D model of phantom (CT) overlaid with live ultrasound. Top right: the position of the ultrasound sector in relation to the CT volume. Bottom right: live ultrasound with color coded Doppler signal
Summary of the main features regarding the liver phantoms available on the market and developed for research purposes
| Multimodal | LUS | Anthropomorphic | Tumors (different types) | Blood vessels | Blood flow | Applications | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banovac et al. [ | No (CT) | No | – | Yes (No) | No | No | Testing technologies for CT-guided needle targeting |
| Bao et al. [ | Yes (US, CT) | Yes | No | No | No | No | US-to-CT registration |
| Chmarra et al. [ | Yes (US, CT, MRI) | Yes | No | Yes (No) | Yes (portal vein) | No | Medical imaging development |
| Herline et al. [ | No (CT) | No | Yes | Yes (No) | No | No | Surface-based registration |
| In et al. [ | No (MRI) | No | No | Yes (No) | No | No | Calibration and training |
| Joe et al. [ | No (CT) | No | – | No | No | No | Assessment of hepatic iron accumulation |
| Kao et al. [ | Yes (PET/CT) | No | No | Yes (No) | No | No | Simulation of heterogeneous microsphere biodistribution of a postradioembolization liver |
| Murotani et al. [ | No (CT) | No | No | Yes (No) | Yes | No | Analysis of the optimum CT reconstruction parameters |
| Olerud et al. [ | No (CT) | No | Yes | Yes (Yes) | No | No | Assessment of image quality in CT and its relationship to radiation dose |
| Pacioni et al. [ | No (US) | No | Yes | Yes (Yes) | Yes (portal vein and vena cava) | No | Training |
| Rube et al. [ | No (MRI) | No | No | Yes (No) | Yes | No | Testing technology for MRI-guided needle targeting |
| Schindera et al. [ | No (CT) | No | No | Yes (No) | No | No | Assessment of the impact of large patient size on the detection of hypovascular tumors |
| Schwaiger et al. [ | No (US) | – | Yes | Yes (No) | Yes | No | Testing of US-based navigation technology |
| Shevchenko et al. [ | Yes (US, CT) | Yes | Yes | Yes (No) | Yes | No | Testing of navigation technology and resection training |
| Sugimoto et al. [ | No (US) | Yes | No | Yes (No) | No | No | Testing imaging systems for US-guided needle targeting |
| Widmann et al. [ | No (CT) | No | Yes | Yes (No) | Yes | No | Testing imaging systems for CT-guided needle targeting |
| Anthropomorphic liver phantom (QRM, Moehrendorf, Germany) | No (CT) | No | Yes | Yes (Yes) | No | No | Medical imaging development and training |
| FAST exam real-time ultrasound training model (CAE Healthcare, CAE Healthcare, Sarasota, FL, USA) | No (US) | No | Yes | No | No | Yes (internal bleeding) | Training |
| IOUSFAN (Kyoto Kagaku Co., Ltd, Kyoto, Japan) [ | No (US) | Yes | Yes | Yes (Yes) | Yes (portal vein, hepatic vein and aorta) | No | Training |
| Triple Modality 3D Abdominal Phantom (CIRS, Norfolk, VA, USA) [ | Yes (US, CT, MRI) | No | Yes | Yes (No) | Yes (portal vein and aorta) | No | Medical imaging development and biopsy training |
LUS Laparoscopic ultrasound
Fig. 123D printed liver vascular system using ABS