Literature DB >> 28927929

Mechanical characterization of structurally porous biomaterials built via additive manufacturing: experiments, predictive models, and design maps for load-bearing bone replacement implants.

D Melancon1, Z S Bagheri1, R B Johnston1, L Liu1, M Tanzer2, D Pasini3.   

Abstract

Porous biomaterials can be additively manufactured with micro-architecture tailored to satisfy the stringent mechano-biological requirements imposed by bone replacement implants. In a previous investigation, we introduced structurally porous biomaterials, featuring strength five times stronger than commercially available porous materials, and confirmed their bone ingrowth capability in an in vivo canine model. While encouraging, the manufactured biomaterials showed geometric mismatches between their internal porous architecture and that of its as-designed counterpart, as well as discrepancies between predicted and tested mechanical properties, issues not fully elucidated. In this work, we propose a systematic approach integrating computed tomography, mechanical testing, and statistical analysis of geometric imperfections to generate statistical based numerical models of high-strength additively manufactured porous biomaterials. The method is used to develop morphology and mechanical maps that illustrate the role played by pore size, porosity, strut thickness, and topology on the relations governing their elastic modulus and compressive yield strength. Overall, there are mismatches between the mechanical properties of ideal-geometry models and as-manufactured porous biomaterials with average errors of 49% and 41% respectively for compressive elastic modulus and yield strength. The proposed methodology gives more accurate predictions for the compressive stiffness and the compressive strength properties with a reduction of the average error to 11% and 7.6%. The implications of the results and the methodology here introduced are discussed in the relevant biomechanical and clinical context, with insight that highlights promises and limitations of additively manufactured porous biomaterials for load-bearing bone replacement implants. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: In this work, we perform mechanical characterization of load-bearing porous biomaterials for bone replacement over their entire design space. Results capture the shift in geometry and mechanical properties between as-designed and as-manufactured biomaterials induced by additive manufacturing. Characterization of this shift is crucial to ensure appropriate manufacturing of bone replacement implants that enable biological fixation through bone ingrowth as well as mechanical property harmonization with the native bone tissue. In addition, we propose a method to include manufacturing imperfections in the numerical models that can reduce the discrepancy between predicted and tested properties. The results give insight into the use of structurally porous biomaterials for the design and additive fabrication of load-bearing implants for bone replacement.
Copyright © 2017 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Additive manufacturing; Bone replacement implants; Design maps; Mechanical characterization; Structurally porous biomaterial

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28927929     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.09.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  7 in total

Review 1.  Additively manufactured metallic biomaterials.

Authors:  Elham Davoodi; Hossein Montazerian; Anooshe Sadat Mirhakimi; Masoud Zhianmanesh; Osezua Ibhadode; Shahriar Imani Shahabad; Reza Esmaeilizadeh; Einollah Sarikhani; Sahar Toorandaz; Shima A Sarabi; Rohollah Nasiri; Yangzhi Zhu; Javad Kadkhodapour; Bingbing Li; Ali Khademhosseini; Ehsan Toyserkani
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-12-30

2.  Use of a new off-the-shelf 3D-printed trabecular titanium acetabular cup in Chinese patients undergoing hip revision surgery: Short- to mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes.

Authors:  Guangqian Shang; Shuai Xiang; Cuicui Guo; Jianjun Guo; Peng Wang; Yingzhen Wang; Hao Xu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 2.562

3.  Uncertainty quantification of TMS simulations considering MRI segmentation errors.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Luis Gomez; Johann Guilleminot
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Permeability of Trabecular-Like Porous Scaffold by Additive Manufacturing.

Authors:  Long Chao; Chen Jiao; Huixin Liang; Deqiao Xie; Lida Shen; Zhidong Liu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-12-21

Review 5.  Active Materials for 3D Printing in Small Animals: Current Modalities and Future Directions for Orthopedic Applications.

Authors:  Parastoo Memarian; Elham Pishavar; Federica Zanotti; Martina Trentini; Francesca Camponogara; Elisa Soliani; Paolo Gargiulo; Maurizio Isola; Barbara Zavan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  2D Numerical Simulation of Auxetic Metamaterials Based on Force and Deformation Consistency.

Authors:  Antonina Roth; Georg Ganzenmüller; Florian Gutmann; Puneeth Jakkula; François Hild; Aron Pfaff; Kaiyang Yin; Chris Eberl; Stefan Hiermaier
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 3.748

7.  Three-Dimensional, MultiScale, and Interconnected Trabecular Bone Mimic Porous Tantalum Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Wang; Zhenglin Zhu; Haozuo Xiao; Changqi Luo; Xiaoji Luo; Furong Lv; Junyi Liao; Wei Huang
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2020-08-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.