Literature DB >> 35133296

Uncertainty quantification of TMS simulations considering MRI segmentation errors.

Hao Zhang1, Luis Gomez2, Johann Guilleminot3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation method that is used to study brain function and conduct neuropsychiatric therapy. Computational methods that are commonly used for electric field (E-field) dosimetry of TMS are limited in accuracy and precision because of possible geometric errors introduced in the generation of head models by segmenting medical images into tissue types. This paper studies E-field prediction fidelity as a function of segmentation accuracy. APPROACH: The errors in the segmentation of medical images into tissue types are modeled as geometric uncertainty in the shape of the boundary between tissue types. For each tissue boundary realization, we then use an in-house boundary element method to perform a forward propagation analysis and quantify the impact of tissue boundary uncertainties on the induced cortical E-field. MAIN
RESULTS: Our results indicate that predictions of E-field induced in the brain are negligibly sensitive to segmentation errors in scalp, skull and white matter, compartments. In contrast, E-field predictions are highly sensitive to possible CSF segmentation errors. Specifically, the segmentation errors on the CSF and gray matter interface lead to higher E-field uncertainties in the gyral crowns, and the segmentation errors on CSF and white matter interface lead to higher uncertainties in the sulci. Furthermore, the uncertainty of the average cortical E-fields over a region exhibits lower uncertainty relative to point-wise estimates. SIGNIFICANCE: The accuracy of current cortical E-field simulations is limited by the accuracy of CSF segmentation accuracy. Other quantities of interest like the average of the E-field over a cortical region could provide a dose quantity that is robust to possible segmentation errors. NA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TMS simulation; non-Gaussian random field; patient-specific brain geometry; uncertainty quantification

Year:  2022        PMID: 35133296      PMCID: PMC9357859          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac52d1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.043


  30 in total

Review 1.  Paired-pulse investigations of short-latency intracortical facilitation using TMS in humans.

Authors:  J C Rothwell
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl       Date:  1999

Review 2.  Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation dose: definition, selection, and reporting practices.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Timothy A Wagner; Pedro C Miranda; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus; Sarah H Lisanby; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Unified segmentation.

Authors:  John Ashburner; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: diagnostic, therapeutic, and research potential.

Authors:  Paolo M Rossini; Simone Rossi
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Adaptive segmentation of MRI data.

Authors:  W M Wells; W L Grimson; R Kikinis; F A Jolesz
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  TMS evidence for the involvement of the right occipital face area in early face processing.

Authors:  David Pitcher; Vincent Walsh; Galit Yovel; Bradley Duchaine
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Effects of posture on electric fields of non-invasive brain stimulation.

Authors:  Marko Mikkonen; Ilkka Laakso
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Electric field simulations for transcranial brain stimulation using FEM: an efficient implementation and error analysis.

Authors:  Guilherme B Saturnino; Kristoffer H Madsen; Axel Thielscher
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Automatic skull segmentation from MR images for realistic volume conductor models of the head: Assessment of the state-of-the-art.

Authors:  Jesper D Nielsen; Kristoffer H Madsen; Oula Puonti; Hartwig R Siebner; Christian Bauer; Camilla Gøbel Madsen; Guilherme B Saturnino; Axel Thielscher
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Influence of segmentation accuracy in structural MR head scans on electric field computation for TMS and tES.

Authors:  Essam A Rashed; Jose Gomez-Tames; Akimasa Hirata
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.